Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Dorfman 03-23-2014 08:37 AM

:D

Originally Posted by The Cavalier (Post 1608503)
More money, more time off. Airplanes are mere little details.

I agree 100%. I would fly whatever airplane Delta buys that gives me the most time off and the most money.

It just boggles my mind that some guys would retire or quit before flying an Airbus product. Of course if there senior to me I would be happy to sign the retirement poster!:D

gloopy 03-23-2014 09:09 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1608212)
i can only speak for myself but i had a great time, met a lot of great people and enjoyed all 3.5 years. its a very nice place with a lot of nice people.

Why didn't you stay the extra 0.5 and finish up?

80ktsClamp 03-23-2014 09:15 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1608591)
There is nothing I like about the Flight control logic used by airbus however you're exactly right. In the end it's about money and time off.

I guess you don't like the 777, 787 and every modern fighter and the C-17, either.

gloopy 03-23-2014 09:25 AM


Originally Posted by GogglesPisano (Post 1608592)
The fact that foreign entities are getting US-subsidized financing where US carriers cannot is sickening. Especially in this era of "free markets," and "free trade." It's not supposed to be fair or make sense anymore, it's all about the lobbying.

Exactly. This isn't about the home team or American jobs, this is about soft fascism at its finest. Boeing is not going away, with or without government welfare for foreign airlines using our own petro dollars to threaten us to subsidize them as they try and yank an entire industry out from under us.

Boeing is nads deep in the extremely bloated global police state "defense" industry as well. They aren't going anywhere. They aren't just too big to fail, they're too big to flush.

As for Ford/Chevy vs Honda/Toyota, which is more "American", a Ford made largely in Mexico, a Chevy made in Canada, or a Honda made in Indiana or a Toyota made in Kentucky?

Boeing is outsourcing tons of jobs to foreign countries, and Airbus is opening plants in the US.

Yet the shieks keep bribing us with our own money and we keep falling for it.

Its far beyond time to close the "Bank of Boeing".

forgot to bid 03-23-2014 09:27 AM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1608638)
Why didn't you stay the extra 0.5 and finish up?

i went summers. crammed 5 years into 3.5.

i wish i had taken 5 years to do 5. dammit. i was having too much fun then i get a email that the end was nearing and then they said goodbye.

then i went from a place with 12000 coeds to look at, vast majority were very attractive, to the crew room in the bottom of terminal B in IAH. depressing.

gloopy 03-23-2014 09:30 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1608647)
i went summers. crammed 5 years into 3.5.

i wish i had taken 5 years to do 5. dammit. i was having too much fun then i get a email that the end was nearing and then they said goodbye.

then i went from a place with 12000 coeds to look at, vast majority were very attractive, to the crew room in the bottom of terminal B in IAH. depressing.

Yeah but now you can go back and troll the quad in uniform, for great success!

dalad 03-23-2014 10:22 AM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1608649)
Yeah but now you can go back and troll the quad in uniform, for great success!

Only if he's wearing the double breasted horse blanket and hat.

sailingfun 03-23-2014 10:36 AM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1608639)
I guess you don't like the 777, 787 and every modern fighter and the C-17, either.

Very different logic in the 787 verses the airbus. Also very different logic in FBW aircraft I flew. They are many types and implementations of FWB systems. Airbus designed their system to be cheap and easy to manufacturer. They could have included a rate motion feedback loop but they chose not to. They could have included back driven controls but they chose not to. The could have allowed pilot selectable modes but choose not to. Nothing wrong with what they did. They built it from the start to be the hamburger helper of the airline world. For the most part it's worked out for them. Best comment I heard from a several thousand hour A330 pilot when asked how it flew, "I don't know I have never flown it!" You will never hear a 777 pilot say that.
They do have great cockpits and it's a nice work space.

Check Essential 03-23-2014 10:39 AM


Originally Posted by dalad (Post 1608674)
Only if he's wearing the double breasted horse blanket and hat.

Chicks dig the hat.

http://guyism.com/wp-content/uploads...ihanna-777.jpg

full of luv 03-23-2014 10:51 AM


Originally Posted by Timbo (Post 1608569)
I keep forgetting that our "new" 777's are really over 20 year old designs, and Delta took delivery of their first 767 back in 1983, which makes that design well over 30 years old!

It sucks getting old!

I was an AA engineering student at UW in Seattle in the late 80's, Boeing's backyard. We got several presentations from Boeing alumni who were working on the program about how the 777 was the first airplane design proofed on computers and finite element analysis vs the old clay in the wind tunnel / material strength testing methods.
Also marked the end of overheads and the birth of Powerpoint!!!:eek:


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:35 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands