Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2014, 07:20 AM
  #152161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by FL370 View Post
So true. All of my former colleagues who got hired at Emirates around that time are Captains on the 777 or 330 by now. Some can even hold the left seat on the 380. So glad I can hold narrow body reserve as a FO with Tuesdays off (not complaining, but the irony...)
They have LGBP, so aircraft type doesn't matter. Coverting the top scale CA (10 yr) pay over there is $10548 +16.26 per flt hour.
The first 97k is tax free so that helps to the tune of $24,300/yr = $2,025/mo
So an 80 hour month= $10548+1,300+2025= 13,873 = $173/hr. (effective rate conversion)

Flying on days off is $176+$16.26/hr, so a 10 hr 2-day pays $515 (not sure on the calc for this)
401k is 12% until after year 10, then 15%
Housing/utilities paid... But you have to live in the sandbox.

This info comes from APC Emirates profile.
I think the recent rebounds in compensation at US legacies is starting to outstrip the MEA's. Another solid round of increases will really start to stem of the flow over to the ME from the US.

Now if the NAI "flag of convenience" model is permitted to work in the US, all bets are off.
shiznit is offline  
Old 03-24-2014, 07:34 AM
  #152162  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Claybird View Post
Y'all think Boeing is the only one engaged in this?

Airbus Buys German Bank for In-House Finance Unit

And you think this has NOTHING to do with the recent WTO ruling? Ya, right!

Congress should wake up and assert itself in favor of American businesses.
I don't dispute your point here. My input to this particular argument has only one focus: That being whom I would rather see go out of business... DAL or BA. I would much rather see BA go out of business. The secondary issue is whether I believe BA is any danger of that. Absolutely not, because they do lots more than build commercial airplanes. It is up to them to produce a better product than airbus, and I believe that in many ways they do, but they also have to be price competitive. The market will determine that IF, the market is allowed to function. When Boeing gets subsidies from both another country's government AND OURS, it's not a fair market, and it is not Boeing that is ultimately being harmed. Frankly, I am surprised they can get away with it fro a legal perspective. (disclaimer: not a lawyer and not in H.I. Express) So to your last point, if the US Government were to ever get over itself, and support US businesses, those low interest loans would be available to American companies as well as government supported sand fleas. And I say all of this from the perspective of a guy that would rather sell crack than fly an airbus.
tsquare is offline  
Old 03-24-2014, 07:39 AM
  #152163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default

Much better return on selling crack than flying any aircraft! Possible benefits are all inclusive resort via your local law enforcement.
iceman49 is offline  
Old 03-24-2014, 07:39 AM
  #152164  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Don't understand why T-Square thinks Boeing's pricing is unreasonable.

We procured 100 737-900s because Boeing boned the 787 program and owed us LOTS of money. What other Boeings have we bought? We ordered a bunch of 321s and a few 330s. So the impending RFP will be telling. My bracket isn't busted on these conclusions and predictions, and in my final four, I have a few 737-900s, but NOTHING bigger from Washington State.

Oh, and how bout my VOLS?
tsquare is offline  
Old 03-24-2014, 07:42 AM
  #152165  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
Exactly. This isn't about the home team or American jobs, this is about soft fascism at its finest. Boeing is not going away, with or without government welfare for foreign airlines using our own petro dollars to threaten us to subsidize them as they try and yank an entire industry out from under us.

Boeing is nads deep in the extremely bloated global police state "defense" industry as well. They aren't going anywhere. They aren't just too big to fail, they're too big to flush.

As for Ford/Chevy vs Honda/Toyota, which is more "American", a Ford made largely in Mexico, a Chevy made in Canada, or a Honda made in Indiana or a Toyota made in Kentucky?

Boeing is outsourcing tons of jobs to foreign countries, and Airbus is opening plants in the US.

Yet the shieks keep bribing us with our own money and we keep falling for it.

Its far beyond time to close the "Bank of Boeing".
++++++++++++++++++++++717
tsquare is offline  
Old 03-24-2014, 07:44 AM
  #152166  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire View Post
Did they say why? I've flown em' both, generally prefer Boeing from a pilots perspective, but mission, lifestyle, and pay come first, and there is nothing on the Airbus I consider no-go. 330 flying is probably best in the airline if you like international.

But I like MD's too, so you know I'm a cheap date
I think you hit on the crux of the opinion. The ones that didn't like the airplane, didn't like it from a pilots' perspective. One said "I'll tell you everything I like about the Airbus... It's a comfortable cockpit"..... that was it. That was all he liked about it. The other one didn't say, other than to say it was a mistake and he would bid off as soon as he could.

And re-reading my post, I probably said something I should not have said, but I want to explain that comment. I said it was an unsafe design, and that was bad verbiage. To me, it seems to be a great design for a single pilot operation. For the last almost 30 years of my flying career, I have had secondary inputs from the airplane which IMHO are very important when you have another idiot sitting next to you that can change things without your knowledge. Frozen throttles, joysticks that are not interconnected AND out of easy view of the other pilot are a couple of things that (IMO) remove that safeguard.

The other points you raised are the very same issues with, and why I am not interested in flying either the 777 or 747. I still love flying the airplane, and I still love going places. Neither of those missions interest me, and you never get to fly. While the 330 is not in THAT category, for me it comes down to the airplane. It's just not for me. So for all you guys junior to me, you moved up a number as far as holding captain on it, so you should be encouraging more old farts like me to stay off of it.... Unless the rope burns me off thru retirements of 757s, it will be a cold day in Alabama before I learn to speak french.
tsquare is offline  
Old 03-24-2014, 07:48 AM
  #152167  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by maddogmax View Post
Having been a LCA on both Boeing and Airbus, I have found that guy's/gal's prefer whichever one they first checked out on. By the way T, the retard call is a reminder not a command. If you Boeing guy's learn the auto throttle properly, you will never hear it. Go Wichita State, Oooops, they just lost. There goes my $billion
How come it doesn't "remind" you to flare? Or raise the gear? It's creepy and annoying. Where's the CB? And I turn autothrottles off on most of my landings... or is it autothrust?

Last edited by tsquare; 03-24-2014 at 08:03 AM.
tsquare is offline  
Old 03-24-2014, 07:54 AM
  #152168  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
If Boeing is going to go out of business because the EX-IM is not renewed, I still vote us. Boeing will be rescued and hopefully fixed.
I have no idea what all this doom and gloom about Boeing is all about. Their stock is doing well, and they are solidly profitable. Strip off the commercial aircraft division, and I'll bet they STILL make money.

Screw the EX-IM bank, and those foreign entities that benefit from it.
tsquare is offline  
Old 03-24-2014, 08:01 AM
  #152169  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49 View Post
Much better return on selling crack than flying any aircraft! Possible benefits are all inclusive resort via your local law enforcement.
Might be a good retirement plan is the gubbamint steals mine.

3 hots and a cot, and whose gonna mess with an 85 year old man?
tsquare is offline  
Old 03-24-2014, 08:14 AM
  #152170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
I don't think you will see the larger Mid East carriers go that route. They like to maintain absolute control over their employees. They will not see a real shortage of applicants and if they do they will pay more.
Correct on the ME carriers. Asian carriers have already started.

Here comes the supply and demand curve.
TheManager is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices