![]() |
|
New Call to Action
There's a new Call to Action in this week's Vectors.
Take 30 seconds to ping your congressman and senators about the spread of CBP facilities in the Middle East: ALPA On the Issues |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1620303)
I would be willing to bet the replacement for the 747 will be the 777 or A350-1000. All the aircraft under consideration to replace the 767ER pay a lot more.
And for your next post, I was coming back from AMS. I was just doing a couple of line checks. |
Great cartoon DogWhisperer!
|
Originally Posted by Big E 757
(Post 1620434)
T was just filling his daily quota of at least 1 LBP type crack per day. I'm sure he knows better than to assume we would fill the 747's shoes with an aircraft with over 100 less seats.
|
My scanner doesn't like the size of the paper used….cuts off some of the page….missing the ability to see the Sierra Nevada Torpedo….and that IS the SHOCKER three finger salute….
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1620441)
It would be interesting if someone could break down a current 747-400 route vs having a 777-300 do the same route. You could figure out the fuel, cargo and passenger comparison.
I think airlines loved their 744s, they ran them hard and they're not getting younger. Unless we get some now, your choice seems to be a 777-300, A380 or 748. Just by looking at the Boeing and Airbus order books it seems like airlines opted for the 773 and 380 (and obviously none of those were UAL/DAL/AMR). My guess, 773s a long time from now and 330s. But I do have another question to ponder. The 7ERs are being touted as "old" in some print, with an average age of 18 years. Those airplanes have few cycles on them which is what I thought was the killer of airplanes. I was on a 717 JS last night (nice airplane btw) and the airworthiness cert was something like 2002. Gawd knows how long the MadDogs have been around, yet there is no talk of those being "old"... Anybody help me out on this? |
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1620512)
Why are you guys so happy to give up more productivity to the company?
It's just a jab ya know... :) |
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
(Post 1620875)
Let me add.
Less pilots on the seniority list. Done Ten |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1621374)
This^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
But I do have another question to ponder. The 7ERs are being touted as "old" in some print, with an average age of 18 years. Those airplanes have few cycles on them which is what I thought was the killer of airplanes. I was on a 717 JS last night (nice airplane btw) and the airworthiness cert was something like 2002. Gawd knows how long the MadDogs have been around, yet there is no talk of those being "old"... Anybody help me out on this? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:25 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands