![]() |
|
Originally Posted by DogWhisperer
(Post 1621314)
A LONG, LONG TIME AGO….IN A LAYOVER NOT TOO FAR AWAY...
http://i775.photobucket.com/albums/y...ps47e5d8cd.jpg :D |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1620512)
Why are you guys so happy to give up more productivity to the company?
See here's the thing. We have 34 of the biggest most productive airplanes, and only 11,000 pilots. The number of pilots that get to enjoy the benefit of that productivity is relatively small, and they will be there for a relatively small amount of time as well. Why should the entire group GAS about a payscale that benefits relatively few, and (I might add) to the detriment of one's career earnings? In the days of a DB plan, it was cool if you wanted to be senior on the DC9 until your last 3 years and suck it up to fly the L1011. Doesn't work that way any more. TVM is very real, and the "productivity" argument completely disregards that concept. It is a huge fail. And as an added bonus, in order to make the biggest bucks possible throughout one's career, you have to sacrifice your QOL. Period. No way around that whatsoever. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1621621)
My statement was a direct quote from the latest LCP meeting regarding the 767 domestic airplanes. They will go away in 2017, and the most likely replacement will be what I stated...
|
Originally Posted by LeineLodge
(Post 1621413)
I guess another question is why doesn't the US prohibit this bastardization of route authorities. We "own" one end of the route don't we? Oh yeah, Emirates is throwing $ around in DC like nobody's business.
I stand by my suggestion to fill out the C2A's and give a few bucks to the PAC. It may not work in every situation, but at least we won't have sat idly by while they pillage our flying. We do own one end of that route. But our government is only slightly less corrupt and slightly less incompetent than that of North Korea. The sand fleas and their governments will be filling Marco Rubio, and Harry Reid's wallet with way more money than the PACs or A4A can possibly muster. Don't get me wrong, we need to keep fighting the fight, but have no illusions that guys like Rubio are in our corner. |
I'm not calling you a liar T. I know that's what's being said... It just doesn't make sense unless its just part of an overall upgauge, and not the top part!
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1621558)
Why?
Because he wants a "unified" group so that he can get what the everybody wants....."the best damn contract." Because with have the pilot group with half pulling away and not all pushing towards this goal? As a result, we have an issue of getting the result that those pulling away are the most vocal and critical to ALPA about? Hmm.... |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1621450)
The chairman's letter was a strongly worded, stern lecture.
Unfortunately, his reprimand was directed at his own constituents (the Delta pilot group), and towards the company. And it did nothing to acknowledge or correct the reasons we have a divided pilot group in the first place. Ordering those disaffected folks to get back on board without doing anything to address or validate their concerns indicates to me he is completely out of touch (despite all the "listening" he has done). Oh...and what about those 117 negotiations? |
Heard some of the Eagle union guys contacted your management looking to make a deal. AAG was threatening to Comair II the Eagle guys; heard they went to Delta MGT and offered all 2700 pilots to staff Endeavor. They just wanted some type of seniority/longevity transfer, or a preferntial hiring program with Delta. Rumor is the Endeavor MGT asked their pilot union about it. Any of you guys have any info on that? Also heard that Donatelli told the Eagle guys that your contract requires 35% of each class to come from ALPA carriers. Is that true also?
It would be a great way to wipe out 60% of AA feed overnight if they really are working on it. |
That's a great letter from Jeff Miller's office. I'd vote for that dude. I always jump on the Calls to Action but I've never gotten a response that looked anything like that one.
|
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1621585)
You made my point. I think it's less than half myself, but it is a significant number.
The chairman simply must address the issues that have driven half (your number) of the pilot group away...and not unctuously demand that those folks get back on board with business as usual. Getting mad and hitting an easy button and seeking an "alternate path" feels good but does nothing to move the needle for the Delta Pilots. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:41 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands