Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

FIIGMO 05-20-2014 07:36 PM

Guys I went to state college, which is like going to high school twice, so go easy! Have not read the whole TA but tell me there is something in there that will get rid of the worst butt sucking 3 day 10hour trips like we have in LAX......

CRIMINAL :mad:

Fiig

TheManager 05-20-2014 07:46 PM


Originally Posted by TenYearsGone (Post 1647831)
Scambo,

The CDO thing might be a distractor for other agendas. Maybe there is no intent to implement CDOs. Just a tool to get our eyes off the real issue. CDOs are so ridiculous to implement or suggest in a perceived pro-safety/fatigue environment, that I am beginning to think that the issue is created to help move pass along another issue:confused:

TEN


The company asked for CDO's

Think about that for a minute. WHY?

Because they stand to make more a$$ load$ of ca$h.

Take a 1.5 hour circle and draw it around Charlotte, you know, the USAirways/American hub. Take all the viables, RDU, GSO, SAV, GSP, you get the picture.

Delta's marketing will create a CDO from those cities to ATL. Perhaps they even add a late night bank with more utilization of the NBs they are short of.

As they siphon off their competitors traffic that had better options going through CLT, but now have equal or better options through hooterville, they make cash!

What did we just get for that giant concession. :mad:

Hillbilly 05-20-2014 08:09 PM


Originally Posted by Superdad (Post 1646994)
Sorry for the topic change but I cannot find any reference to jury duty in the PWA. I already have a trip on the days that I have been summoned, what happens to that trip?


Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 (Post 1647003)
There's a jury duty form online. You need to let the company know ASAP. They will drop as little of your trip as possible so you can make jury duty (could be whole trip). You will be paid for the dropped part of your trip. If you do not let the company know in a timely manner, it will be dropped without pay (yes this has happened). Jury duty is referenced in section 12 of the PWA.


Originally Posted by Splash (Post 1647077)
"Jury duty" didn't cover it.

If you're called as a witness or subpoenaed, you're treated the same as Jury duty.

It's not in Section 12, it's in Section 13 E. of the PWA. The words you need to search for in the Live Contract are "legal duty leave". The key ingredient is that you are required to notify the Pilot Support Center immediately upon receiving a summons. After that, they are obligated to ensure you are available to perform your legal duties. If that means they need to drop all or a portion of a trip to do so, you are pay protected. If notification occurs before bidding closes for the affected month, the company has the option of pre-posting the legal duty leave on your schedule and it pays 5:15 for each day they pre-post.

If you fail to notify them immediately upon receipt of the summons, they are still obligated to ensure you are free from work to perform your legal duties, however they are no longer contractually required to pay protect you. Bottom line, let them know ASAP because a brothas gotta get paid.

TheManager 05-20-2014 08:12 PM


Originally Posted by MD88Driver (Post 1647808)
Manager, that was one of the funniest posts I've ever read on here!

Trying to find something around here to laugh at.

shiznit 05-20-2014 08:50 PM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1647766)
That ADG part I like. No argument there.
But we're talking about trips that go out for pay/no credit.
Guys will fly more and make more money but it will reduce manning and cost jobs.

That is true, but I don't think it is applicable here... If an SDP is no more than 4:00 block, and the duty rig will pay and credit approx. 6:50 at most, it's still more expensive in pay of 7:30 and credit of 6:50 to operate two legs as an SDP instead of part of a "normal" rotation where it can end up as a block time pay instead of credit.

With pay/no credit above other rigs, well we didn't have an ADG 2 years ago, now we are about to have a 5:15 (and we went from two carve outs to one)... Section 6 is less than a year out and that is a perfect time to up the SDP to pay and credit (and maybe even to 7:45 or 8:00!)

Incremental gains add up over time.

Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1647773)
You may be in the minority, but you are not alone.

I don't understand why guys want to work that much. It's a sad state of affairs when some clowns can't live within their means, and then proceed to **** away QOL for everyone else.

Pathetic, really.


Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy (Post 1647801)
Mark your calendar, gzsg. I agree with you (and Check) 100%. I was one of the few who voted against C2K because of the work rule changes, and never regretted it. We are our own worst enemies.

Oh gawd, I'm going to openly admit I agree with PD and gszg also. :D
(I've always been a QOL over money guy too...but I'd like both when possible!)

Hillbilly 05-20-2014 08:54 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1647142)
The funny thing is, that's almost exactly what I would do when I used to do them. I'd work out, tell people they were wrong on the internet, and then get about a 2 hour nap during the layover. When I got back home I'd sleep for 6 hours. I found that was the least fatiguing method for me.

Same here, except I couldn't get on the internet. :p I did do a fair amount of hand building the lines of time at my previous airline for the categories in my base back then while at the hotels though, which was productive.

In a galaxy far, far away I did over 70 (not by choice) split duty rotations (high speeds was what we called them then) without any other type of intervening trip over a 5 month period at my previous airline. It took planning for me to be responsible for my rest and ensure I was sleeping as much as possible during the day. There were always things I would rather be doing, but it was ultimately my responsibility to ensure I was rested before I showed up for a high speed. This included commuting in early to ensure I could sleep before reporting for the first one in a typical string of 4 in a row.

While I did many of them and did not suffer from excessive fatigue (because I planned accordingly) nor did I have any health complications as others have intimated, I am not currently in favor of allowing them in our PWA.

hockeypilot44 05-20-2014 08:57 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1647752)
It was about the 5th post on the subject and guys kept trying to post that 3 pilots are cheaper then two so I admit a bit of frustration. If they made sense airlines would have been flying them.

I am arguing that 3 pilots is cheaper than 4. I am thinking of the Caribbean turns where a crew deadheads down and flies back. Now that trip will be done with 1 captain and 2 first officers instead of 2 captains and 2 first officers. I could handle it if it was done with 2 captains and 1 first officer. I am disturbed about losing that captain position.

EdGrimley 05-20-2014 09:09 PM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1647896)
Section 6 is less than a year out and that is a perfect time to up the SDP to pay and credit (and maybe even to 7:45 or 8:00!)

Incremental gains add up over time.

As do concessions, fatigue and lousy work rules.

shiznit 05-20-2014 09:12 PM


Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 (Post 1647902)
I am arguing that 3 pilots is cheaper than 4. I am thinking of the Caribbean turns where a crew deadheads down and flies back. Now that trip will be done with 1 captain and 2 first officers instead of 2 captains and 2 first officers. I could handle it if it was done with 2 captains and 1 first officer. I am disturbed about losing that captain position.

I'm still waiting to see a domestic 757 or 737 with a class 3 rest facility to fly said rotation legally.:confused:

Have you asked your rep if the dinner/movie flights will be affected and why/why not?

EdGrimley 05-20-2014 09:15 PM


Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 (Post 1647902)
I am arguing that 3 pilots is cheaper than 4. I am thinking of the Caribbean turns where a crew deadheads down and flies back. Now that trip will be done with 1 captain and 2 first officers instead of 2 captains and 2 first officers. I could handle it if it was done with 2 captains and 1 first officer. I am disturbed about losing that captain position.

A good point. I believe there are multiple "gotchas" to the new rules being proposed. The company has a team that looks at these things over a long period of time (longer than the NC). The company makes the first offer anchoring everything to what they are after.

More food for thought, those flying international that feel insulated from CDO's right now...if banding occurs in the future (and it likely will to reduce training footprint), those same guys may choose to fly domestic for the same pay but then run into CDO's.

Anything that reduces safety or bodies required should be quickly rejected.

If a proposal doesn't pass the sniff test and the "gains" are based upon sorta, kinda, maybe and surgically extracting best case scenarios are used (as some within our union have been known to offer up to get to "yes")....these type of offers should be rejected forthright.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:17 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands