![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1647839)
OBTW - I am beginning to have serious doubts about this TA but to all those who say "Whats the rush?" I respond with the fact that we have known about 117 for two years, and have been operating under it for 5 1/2 months - this may be ill conceived (still undecided) but was not rushed.
|
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1647726)
If every widebody captain was capped at 75 hours just think how many more widebody captains we would need. And so on down the list.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1647916)
The concept of a "cap" is so far out of the barn at this point that Secretariat couldn't catch it..... that horse ain't ever coming back.
Actually, FAR 117 just imposed a "Cap"....only 100 hours in 28 days now. :eek: There are many, many trips still in our open time now, that under the previous "120 hours in 30 days" rule, would have been swapped/White slipped an gone by now. I've heard several senior 777 F/O's crying about it, and some LCA's as well, seems they just took a 20hr. per month pay cut. :eek: And those extra 20 hours were usually paid at G/S rates, i.e. they took a 40 hr. per month pay cut from the 'old rules'. |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1647799)
If we went to a hard 75 hours a month, we would have thousands more captains.
We really have almost no PWA limits on the number of hours a pilot can fly. And you're right, the PWA doesn't really limit us. FARs do, and that's what most pilots want. |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1647836)
youre pointless and tiresome welcome to ignore.
|
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1647921)
Actually, FAR 117 just imposed a "Cap"....only 100 hours in 28 days now. :eek:
There are many, many trips still in our open time now, that under the previous "120 hours in 30 days" rule, would have been swapped/White slipped an gone by now. I've heard several senior 777 F/O's crying about it, and some LCA's as well, seems they just took a 20hr. per month pay cut. :eek: And those extra 20 hours were usually paid at G/S rates, i.e. they took a 40 hr. per month pay cut from the 'old rules'. |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1647902)
I am arguing that 3 pilots is cheaper than 4. I am thinking of the Caribbean turns where a crew deadheads down and flies back. Now that trip will be done with 1 captain and 2 first officers instead of 2 captains and 2 first officers. I could handle it if it was done with 2 captains and 1 first officer. I am disturbed about losing that captain position.
It seems to me the company would be increasing block hours by adding the second FO and would only be saving the cost of two hotel rooms for the two man crew that would normally be laying over. Denny Edit: Having reread your post, I see what you are talking about. Never mind...:o |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1647928)
True dat. Hey did you see my message that I sailed with one of your compadres this weekend? Matt McD... You really outta come out sailing a real boat sometime. :) Cuba Libres all around! Sorry I will miss the regatta this weekend. I do want to get out on a Hobie sometime though
And was Gina there? And was Rum involved? :eek: I'm doing the F16 Worlds in Newport in June, on one of Matt's new boats. Should be quite a party! :D http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tkE8VzoymU |
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1647934)
Did you go out on one of Matt's boats, or did he go out on yours?
And was Gina there? And was Rum involved? :eek: I'm doing the F16 Worlds in Newport in June, on one of Matt's new boats. Should be quite a party! :D Did I mention there will be rum on the boat? |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1647936)
:) Come with us some Wednesday night.
Did I mention there will be rum on the boat? In 1985-6 I crewed on a Hobie 33 out of Miami, we did the Miami-Key Largo race, great party that was! |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:42 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands