|
|
Originally Posted by index
(Post 1644407)
You're assumption that I'm angry is wrong. I love my job and have a great time at work.
I'm guilty of taking cheap shots at times. And I'll hurl the occasional sarcasm. You hav You live in a mighty big glass house. You have a long track record of insulting, name calling, berating, etc... your fellow co-workers on this forum. Several on this forum constantly suck up to you to stay out of your crosshairs. |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 1644409)
Do you remember how you posted what a party must do the get a preliminary injunction?
Take a look at the United case to see how the Court evaluates the criteria you listed. It starts on page 80 and continues to the end of the decision (page 85). If you want to see how the Court would most likely treat the evidence Delta would use to establish that we were the cause of their cancelled flights, take a look at page 31. Finally, take a look at the duty the Court feels the RLA imposes on ALPA. (page 63). Read the case law, which you asked for, that I presented. You will see that I didn't make your point. It's moot anyway. We surrendered without even a whimper. But we didn't have that most certain injunction imposed. Whew!!! What a relief. |
Originally Posted by index
(Post 1644413)
We surrendered without even a whimper.
|
Originally Posted by index
(Post 1644279)
Different set of facts. Different court. It's no wonder that our profession is in the state it's in with guys like you so ready to throw in the towel with the slightest hint of difficulty or obstacles.
Index, you obviously don't know me. The reason I know about this stuff is precisely because I didn't throw in the towel at the slightest hint of difficulty or obstacles. I was probably willing to do more than you ever were and I still am. You should ask somebody. |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1644379)
The upside of the TA will be inversely proportional to the number of posts here by the usual ALPA suspects extolling its virtues and berating those who question its provisions.
|
Originally Posted by index
(Post 1644399)
Good grief. Non sequitur. You posted a link to a UAL case with the insinuation that because of it we would be doomed from the start. You're ready to raise the white flag without even a contest. Were you also not in favor of filing a grievance on January 1?
I've said many time now that SD's memo is worthless. We have the high ground and we will win. The fact that you think I'm raising the white flag without a contest shows that you aren't paying attention. |
Index,
I know newk and know is his background well. For those of us in the bleachers with glazed over eyes on y'alls legal discussion, what is your background? Not detailed, but overview(like did you complete law school and if so, are you an atty.) You seem knowledgeable, bwtfdik. Thanks |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1644384)
. I guess that those of us that apparently didn't grow up in privilege don't know what we are missing.
Thank goodness the company has folks like you who are willing to settle for whatever crumbs they decide to toss your way. |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1644427)
Class warfare? :rolleyes:
Thank goodness the company has folks like you who are willing to settle for whatever crumbs they decide to toss your way. How's that DPA thing going? (quack) And btw... when is the vote? |
Originally Posted by flyallnite
(Post 1644411)
Just read on the DLnet about the donation to the Detroit YMCA of $150,000 from the Delta Pilots Charitable Fund. Very nice to see that sort of generosity from our pilots, and read about it on the company newsline no less. Very nice!
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:36 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands