![]() |
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1646019)
Brad Pitts trash...
http://media1.onsugar.com/files/2014...ia-Steinem.jpg personally the flying doesnt bother me when its one leg home after a nap. The old 8 hour overnights on the 88 were unsafe imho because you bracketed the min rest overnight with a five leg day on front or backside and two or three legs on the other. One leg home and done is fine by me. WHAT I DO NOT LIKE is the potential this requires fewer pilots in categories like mine. If it requires fewer crews on any category then what in the freaking hell are they doing? |
Former NWA CEO Steven Rothermeier passed away this weekend. Lost control of the airline to Al & Gary in 1989. Came from the Don Nyrop school of NWA management but would've been interesting to see what NWA would've become without the ridiculous leveraged buyout by Wings. I know a lot of guys who dislike anything NWA CEO but still it's a sad day for the airline with the red tail
|
It's going to take a while to properly digest this, once we have the facts (and we MUST get the facts before a vote takes place), but in any analysis we need to look at the most horrid "frankenstein" trip. Also: don't look at augmented and CDO as separate issue. Don't assume CDO's go back to where they started. Don't assume they represent the start and end of a rotation. And don't think about rotations in the traditional way.
Imagine a NYC rotation where leg 1 is augmenting 2 LA guys going home on a turn, short layover, CDO, end up on the East Coast, then fly with 1 pilot West, and finish a "turn" home augmented with a LA guy on the first leg of his rotation (last leg of yours). Did I just accidentally think of a way to negate Alan and Sailing's math, or am I way off? Do you have to be augmented on the entire time if going > 9 hours, or just the time above 9 hours? |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 1645912)
Absolutely. But, even if they did, I think my question remains. Does it make sense to you?
|
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1646096)
It's going to take a while to properly digest this, once we have the facts (and we MUST get the facts before a vote takes place), but in any analysis we need to look at the most horrid "frankenstein" trip. Also: don't look at augmented and CDO as separate issue. And don't think about rotations in the traditional way.
Imagine a NYC rotation where leg 1 is augmenting 2 LA guys going home on a turn, short layover, CDO, end up on the East Coast, then fly with 1 pilot West, and finish a "turn" home augmented with a LA guy on the first leg of his rotation. Did I just accidentally think of a way to negate Alan and Sailing's math, or am I way off? Do you have to be augmented on the entire time if going > 9 hours, or just the time above 9 hours? The COD is a distinct trip. They can not be inserted mid rotation. (question already asked & answered) We need to verify what happens during a delay on a COD overnight. Summer storms, short legs resulting in flow delays in and out of hubs and other common sources of IROP effecting these type of operations have to be considered. Also, these are the last flights in, first flights out, which typically have the highest percentages of weather related issues and diverts. Fortunately we do have a number of Reps who have experience with these at other airlines. Their experiences help craft a better product. |
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1646084)
With the amount of credit built into a CDO, I don't see how it can result in less credit overall. Given the addition of ADG, I have to think that we're talking more pilots needed, not less.
Do I understand your post, Bar, as saying it cannot be? Where do you get that from? |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1646096)
It's going to take a while to properly digest this, once we have the facts (and we MUST get the facts before a vote takes place), but in any analysis we need to look at the most horrid "frankenstein" trip. Also: don't look at augmented and CDO as separate issue. Don't assume CDO's go back to where they started. Don't assume they represent the start and end of a rotation. And don't think about rotations in the traditional way.
Imagine a NYC rotation where leg 1 is augmenting 2 LA guys going home on a turn, short layover, CDO, end up on the East Coast, then fly with 1 pilot West, and finish a "turn" home augmented with a LA guy on the first leg of his rotation (last leg of yours). Did I just accidentally think of a way to negate Alan and Sailing's math, or am I way off? Do you have to be augmented on the entire time if going > 9 hours, or just the time above 9 hours? I understand the MEC meeting will be open? Has anyone heard for sure? Put me down as a +1 for MEMRAT on this............ Waiting sorta patiently, Ferd |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1646096)
Imagine a NYC rotation where leg 1 is augmenting 2 LA guys going home on a turn, short layover, CDO, end up on the East Coast, then fly with 1 pilot West, and finish a "turn" home augmented with a LA guy on the first leg of his rotation (last leg of yours).
|
We're on the same page, Ferd.
Another question for you APC'ers: never mind whether you like CDO's or not (I don't)... Is there anyone who doesn't think they alone are sufficiently important a change in working conditions, so as not to automatically warrant MEMRAT? I think it's a given that we must be allowed to decide. |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1645981)
There would be nothing to stop skeds from changing something and then blaming us for not checking often enough.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:28 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands