Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

sailingfun 05-18-2014 12:26 PM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1646110)
Phone calls to two Reps.

There are also grouping limits. Three in a row, I think. Was not taking notes.

Did you discuss the issue of pay on the CDO's. If it is not pay and full credit then it would be a no on my part. That would be a precedent we should not set. I have a call into my rep on the issue but no reply yet.

Check Essential 05-18-2014 12:28 PM

The posting of Jennifer Aniston pictures has got to stop. Tomorrow.

http://cdn02.cdn.justjared.com/wp-co...trailer-01.jpg

boog123 05-18-2014 12:30 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1646080)
3 guys over to SFO verses 2 guys. 3 guys back verses 2 guys back. Can you give me any logical reason the company would do that?

Then why is it in there? "We don't think they would do that" Barf.

Last flight out ATL-LAX, 2 pilots, 2 hotels once they get there. etc. Red Eye back, 2 pilots, 2 hotels from previous night.

Instead, augmented crew doing the same, 3 pilots, no hotels. Am I missing something?

13 hour flight time limit, 13 hour duty day.

It's there for a reason. But I think you already know that.

Alan Shore 05-18-2014 12:35 PM


Originally Posted by boog123 (Post 1646136)
Last flight out ATL-LAX, 2 pilots, 2 hotels once they get there. etc. Red Eye back, 2 pilots, 2 hotels from previous night.

Instead, augmented crew doing the same, 3 pilots, no hotels. Am I missing something?

Only that it's two pilots each doing half the turn vs three pilots each doing half the turn (the same three for each leg, of course). One more pilot on each leg vs. the cost of 4 hotel rooms.

Bucking Bar 05-18-2014 12:45 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1646131)
Did you discuss the issue of pay on the CDO's. If it is not pay and full credit then it would be a no on my part. That would be a precedent we should not set. I have a call into my rep on the issue but no reply yet.

I'm not sure I understand how it works, but I think you are right pay and credit. So I think it puts you over guarantee on reserve starting with the first COD.

Bucking Bar 05-18-2014 12:48 PM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1646134)
The posting of Jennifer Aniston pictures has got to stop. Tomorrow.

http://blurbrain.com/wp-content/uplo...es-276x300.jpg

My understanding is an enlightened religious leader issued a Fatwah on Air Conditioners after seeing Friends ... I kid you not.

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/saudi-arabi...-decree-468236

A man identified on Twitter as Abul Ala and claiming to be a Salafist-Wahhabist cleric, has decreed women should not turn on air conditioners or coolers at home, in the absence of their husbands.

According to the Iran-based Al-Alam news network the cleric is alleged to have decreed: “turning on the cooler ventilator is prohibited for women in the absence of their husbands” because “the woman’s act is very dangerous, and may bring about immorality in the society.

Read more at Fatwa Warns Women About Air Conditioners - Blur Brain

sailingfun 05-18-2014 12:56 PM


Originally Posted by boog123 (Post 1646136)
Then why is it in there? "We don't think they would do that" Barf.

Last flight out ATL-LAX, 2 pilots, 2 hotels once they get there. etc. Red Eye back, 2 pilots, 2 hotels from previous night.

Instead, augmented crew doing the same, 3 pilots, no hotels. Am I missing something?

13 hour flight time limit, 13 hour duty day.

It's there for a reason. But I think you already know that.


Yes you really are missing something. This has already been posted about. Flying it as a turn saves the hotel costs only. If the turn is 11 hours round trip then using 3 pilots will generate 33 hours of pay. That does not include additional costs such as increased credit on other rotations. If you fly it with a 2 man crew you have 22 block hours to pay for. I can't believe this is a hard point to grasp.

index 05-18-2014 12:59 PM


Originally Posted by Alan Shore (Post 1645872)
Should we perhaps petition the FAA to put into place a requirement that each pilot spend the ten hours before each duty period in a monitored, isolated facility to prevent him from acting irresponsibly prior to report? maybe we should ask the Company to save us from ourselves by having the station manager measure our fatigue and/or alertness level prior to each report. :eek:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Here's the serious question you posed to 88Driver


Originally Posted by Alan Shore (Post 1646127)
I was serious in my question to 88Driver.

Really? That was a serious question? Petitioning the FAA to have us placed in a monitored, isolated facility prior to report? Sounds pretty sarcastic to me.


Originally Posted by Alan Shore (Post 1646127)
He was accusing me and my fellow pilots of failing to act responsibly and/or comply with the FARs regarding fitness for duty


Originally Posted by Alan Shore (Post 1646127)
unless we are somehow prevented from doing so by the FAR.

The point of the question was to ask him just how far he thought that should go. As out there as it sounds, there have been those in the past who have advocated exactly such a scenario regarding the policing of every pilot's actions prior to report. My view is that we are all big boys who do not need the the gubmint to lead us by the wrist to do the right thing.

His mileage has clearly varied.

You're being a bit overdramatic waiving your "how dare you question my integrity" flag about all of this. You may be the one guy out there that's never flown sick or tired. Good for you. I think most of us have done both at one time or another, sometimes at the same time.

You are completely mischaracterizing 88Driver's statements. His point, if I understand it correctly, is that when you have rules in place (like CDOs) that are inherently unsafe, it places pilots in a very bad place. Probably 99%+ of us are Type-A "get er done" mentality. It's in our very nature to finish. Couple that with pressure from management, or even pressure we may put on ourselves, often leads to making poor decisions about whether or not to continue.


APCLurker put it well:


Originally Posted by APCLurker (Post 1645993)
That's not what happens in real life and most everybody here and throughout the industry knows it. We had a poster here not long ago that posted about being "exhausted" after his deadhead leg (I believe due to a middle seat). He then turned right around and worked the 4 hour leg back to base. Not to mention the commuters that leave home at o-dark-thirty to commute to base then work until 0-dark-thirty that night. Or the people that state they "just couldn't get to sleep last night" and still work the flight. Or the guy that fell asleep on me during a frikken shuttle leg from Bos to Lga. :eek: Or....[insert any number of items we all have experienced here].. Your statement seems a bit too alltruistic.


index 05-18-2014 01:06 PM


Originally Posted by index (Post 1645930)
Further, Alan has been posting non-stop regarding the recently inked TA. I will reserve my judgment until I read the full language.


Originally Posted by Alan Shore (Post 1646127)
So now I'm not allowed to enter into a discussion about my own job? Yes, I'm eager to learn what's in the TA. Yes, I'm interested in engaging in debate over the merits of what we do know. And I believe I've too have made it clear that the devil will be in the details.

That's right, Alan. You're not allowed to enter into a discussion about your job. I was quite clear in my two sentences above. I mean, it left no room for any other conclusion except for the one you came up with.

You're not from Venus are you?:)

Alan Shore 05-18-2014 01:09 PM


Originally Posted by index (Post 1646153)
Really? That was a serious question? Petitioning the FAA to have us placed in a monitored, isolated facility prior to report? Sounds pretty sarcastic to me.

I agree that was a bit of an extreme scenario. :o


Originally Posted by index (Post 1646153)
You're being a bit overdramatic waiving your "how dare you question my integrity" flag about all of this. You may be the one guy out there that's never flown sick or tired. Good for you. I think most of us have done both at one time or another, sometimes at the same time.

You are completely mischaracterizing 88Driver's statements. His point, if I understand it correctly, is that when you have rules in place (like CDOs) that are inherently unsafe, it places pilots in a very bad place.

And he was also a bit overdramatic when he characterizing some, most, or all pilots as those who would not do what it takes to be ready to fly when they're assigned to do so. Rules like CDO's, if properly limited, are not inherently unsafe, unless you assume that pilots' actions beforehand will inevitably make them so. If that is the case, we need to go after commuters because some number of them will not report for duty properly rested. And we need to eliminate early reports in base because some local pilots won't go to bed early like they should.

Where does it end?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:40 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands