![]() |
|
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 1645743)
It just doesn't make good negotiating sense to me. From the company's perspective. Maybe I'll "get it" tomorrow. :D
|
Originally Posted by PilotFrog
(Post 1645757)
The 10 am start is a huge loss. Now we can't start before 12 on anything, sc or lc. Also we are not going from 10 to 13 hrs. If you allow that then you are allowing that SDs memo is our contract and he can change it whenever it behooves him.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1645777)
CDO's,...will go very senior at a 7.5 minimum. It will be interesting to see how often the company uses them with that type of credit. Don't plan on those 30 hour layovers going away. The company will build trips that minimize credit. How the company does that with a 5:15 daily minimum will be interesting. The same on (augmented) transcon turns.
And why would they put a third pilot on a flight that today is crewed by two, i.e., transcons? |
Originally Posted by Ragtop Day
(Post 1645698)
since this covers two calendar days, wouldn't the new 5:15 ADG kick in giving 10:30 for the trip?
|
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1645804)
I agree. Today, the Company can put most, if not all, of those 30-hour layovers into a 4-day trip with 7+ hours of flying on the other 3 days. They don't simply because there's no financial incentive to. Between the CDO guarantee and the ADG, I suspect we'll see exactly that most of the time, thus creating zero credit time from either a CDO or the ADG.
And why would they put a third pilot on a flight that today is crewed by two, i.e., transcons? On another side note, I looked at a few bases and on average 25% of the rotations do not hit 5+15 ADG. |
There are three things in this letter that I don't like:
1. CDO's the company will find a way to abuse them. 2. Adopting the FAR FDP's currently it looks like our contract is more restrictive especially for the late night flying. 3. augmenting non ocean crossing flights. This is currently being flown by two crews (dinner and a movie flights) that is a loss of Captain positions. |
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1645804)
And why would they put a third pilot on a flight that today is crewed by two, i.e., transcons?
They could do it with 3 and no hotel. But the jet has to have a legal rest facility. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1645716)
Absolutely agreed.
As much as I hate to admit it, it's really the only way out of all these ridiculous 30 hour layovers and killing ourselves on the day after the 30 hour layover. I'd hate to see CDOs replace these. I would NEVER attempt to bid one on my line. This is a big step backwards. I think the message is being massaged very carefully to get the spin out there before the facts, because this is a tough sell. I had the impression you were sold on this deal from your very first posts. I just wish we were given the facts and no sales job. I don't like this at all. |
Is there a block time limit on the CDOs?
We used to do them on short flights and they were not that bad as long as you knew they were going to happen. (ie not on reserve) However any wrinkle and they became a nightmare.... Db |
Originally Posted by Schwanker
(Post 1645830)
I just wish we were given the facts and no sales job. I don't like this at all.
Just list the facts. Show us what's better, gained, fixed. Answer questions. Db |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:29 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands