Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Check Essential 05-18-2014 05:30 AM


Originally Posted by Schwanker (Post 1645830)
I just wish we were given the facts and no sales job. I don't like this at all.

Hard to call this a sales job. The union guys are being very tight lipped.

Information is scarce.
The sales job may come later, but not yet.

Schwanker 05-18-2014 05:34 AM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1645841)
Hard to call this a sales job. The union guys are being very tight lipped.

Information is scarce.
The sales job may come later, but not yet.

Agreed. Let the facts determine the message.

Edit: When I said the "message is being massaged very carefully" I was referring to the inside info 80 shared. This is what he passed along when the news was first breaking:

“Announcement regarding 117 will be out very shortly. Some very significant improvements coming.”

“That's all I can say. Limited details may be released by DALPA tonight, but they just got the language.”

“It's certainly a major win, and I think we'll be quite pleased when we get the full details. “

“The communique should be out in the next day or so. No one can legally give any specifics until that is vetted. It is far from cost neutral in our favor, though.”

Alan Shore 05-18-2014 05:44 AM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1645826)
A transcon round trip takes 4 pilots. 2 going out and 2 coming back. Plus a layover hotel.
They could do it with 3 and no hotel. But the jet has to have a legal rest facility.

Today, a trancon takes two pilots per leg, for a total of four pilot duty periods, plus 4 hotel rooms. With the augment, it would take three pilots per leg, for a total of six pilot duty periods and no hotel.

I'm thinking that two pilot duty periods is much more expensive than four hotel rooms.

Check Essential 05-18-2014 05:48 AM


Originally Posted by Alan Shore (Post 1645851)
Today, a trancon takes two pilots per leg, for a total of four pilot duty periods, plus 4 hotel rooms. With the augment, it would take three pilots per leg, for a total of six pilot duty periods and no hotel.

I'm thinking that two pilot duty periods is much more expensive than four hotel rooms.

I'm missing something.
If 3 guys take off from Atlanta and fly a Seattle turn that's 3 duty periods, right?
Roughly 11 hours block time. No layover.

Just like the senior mamas do now. The "area code" FA crews do 'em every day.

Check Essential 05-18-2014 05:52 AM


Originally Posted by dbrownie (Post 1645835)
Is there a block time limit on the CDOs?

2 hours per leg.
2+15 with MEC sched chair approval.

sailingfun 05-18-2014 05:53 AM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1645826)
A transcon round trip takes 4 pilots. 2 going out and 2 coming back. Plus a layover hotel.
They could do it with 3 and no hotel. But the jet has to have a legal rest facility.

Your math eludes me. Let's say the total time of the turn is 11 hours. 2 pilots over and 2 back is 44 hours of block, 3 over and 3 back is 66 hours of block. Block hours equal jobs.

Alan Shore 05-18-2014 05:58 AM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1645854)
I'm missing something.
If 3 guys take off from Atlanta and fly a Seattle turn that's 3 duty periods, right?
Roughly 11 hours block time. No layover.

Good call. The duty period metric was incorrect. Suppose instead that ATL SEA ATL is scheduled for 5:30 per leg (ignore the jet stream and prevailing westerlies for a moment). Today, each leg is flown by two pilots, for a total of 11 x 2 = 22 pilot pay hours, plus four hotel rooms. Tomorrow, each leg could be flown by three pilots, for a total of 11 x 3 = 33 pilot pay hours, and zero hotel rooms.

My assumption is that 11 pilot pay hours (FOs, presumably) cost more than 4 hotel rooms.

Alan Shore 05-18-2014 05:59 AM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1645855)
2 hours per leg.
2+15 with MEC sched chair approval.

And what is the minimum scheduled and actual break between legs that must be provided?

Check Essential 05-18-2014 06:00 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1645856)
Your math eludes me. Let's say the total time of the turn is 11 hours. 2 pilots over and 2 back is 44 hours of block, 3 over and 3 back is 66 hours of block. Block hours equal jobs.

I went to a state college but I don't see how 2 x 11 = 44

DAL 88 Driver 05-18-2014 06:04 AM


Originally Posted by Alan Shore (Post 1645676)
Agreed. You said it's OK for a UPS or FedEx pilot to fly all night because it's what he signed up for. You then went on to say that guys who bid CDO's do so intending to stay up all day. Are these pilots somehow less responsible than the UPS/FedEx guys to fly all night without time in a hotel room?

Yes. My observation has been that is exactly what happens. UPS/FedEx pilots tend to sleep during the day. Their normal duty period is at night... it's not some convoluted work-around to skirt the intent of the FAR as it has always been with CDO's. Pilots flying CDO's tend to depend on whatever sleep they can get at he hotel during the CDO. My experience has been that there is a significant difference between the way these two situations are handled. FedEx/UPS pilots utilize their rest break for sleeping. CDO pilots utilize the time in between flights during the CDO for sleeeping. The former can allow for 8 hours of sleep. The latter cannot.



Originally Posted by Alan Shore (Post 1645676)
Presumably so. IOW, they assumed that a professional pilot will do what he needs to do to be rested and fit for duty when he reports.

In my experience with CDO's, that's a bad assumption.



Originally Posted by Alan Shore (Post 1645676)
Certainly not, and yes I do. My trips consist primarily of 3-man Europe. I assume that the guys with whom I fly did what they needed to do during the day to be prepared to fly. Are you saying that the FAA should have assumed that they choose to get up early with the kids, mow the lawn and work in the shop all day, and then report to fly all night?

The FAA should have looked at the track record of what actually happens with these CDO's, instead of burying their heads in the sand and thinking it's okay because it works out "on paper." The whole objective with FAR 117 was to stop pilots from flying fatigued. They should have plugged the CDO loophole if they wanted to really do that. I still can't believe we're even discussing this at Delta Air Lines. Ridiculous.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:27 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands