Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Alan Shore 07-08-2014 04:00 AM


Originally Posted by orvil (Post 1679590)
I am not management. I am not a stockholder. I am an hourly wage worker. I do not change how I conduct my little operation based on corporate profitability.

True. But the efficiency with which we do our jobs (or not) does have an impact on the operation and the ultimate profitability of the corporation.


Originally Posted by orvil (Post 1679590)
I want this compensation in my pay rates and work rules. Both for the good years and bad years.

I would like that too. Unfortunately, we've all seen how that's worked out over the years. :(

sailingfun 07-08-2014 05:18 AM


Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 1679576)
Good Point. But all the earlies are not necessarily 64.

No but they have to be removed from whatever year they would have gone out later. I think we have around 600 retirements planned for 2018. It 300 of those leave between now and 2017 that planned number is down to 300 for 2018 when you start the year.

gzsg 07-08-2014 05:40 AM


Originally Posted by orvil (Post 1679590)
Sorry to burst your bubble. You are a not alone. I share your view about profit sharing.

I am not management. I am not a stockholder. I am an hourly wage worker. I do not change how I conduct my little operation based on corporate profitability.

I want this compensation in my pay rates and work rules. Both for the good years and bad years.

I.understand where you are.coming from but why should we give.up or.trade anything?

We need to.keep.what we have and make.historic gains.

This is not a concessionary contract.

gzsg 07-08-2014 05:43 AM


Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy (Post 1679586)
I agree we've had 111 thus far. 56 of those were age 65 mandatory. We'll have another 62 mandatory and probably 60 other, for a total of approximately 230 this year, and while that happens to be 2x the mandatory as you mention, it also happens to be mandatory plus 1% of the list.

In the coming years, with the bulge of pilots over age 60, I suspect the 1% non-mandatory group will be slightly larger, but it won't be 2x the actual, so if you're looking for predictions:

2015: 300 (170 age 65 plus 130 more)
2016: 370 (230 age 65 plus 140 more)

Your numbers sounds very reasonable and you are probably right. I think they will be higher.

Thanks for the post.

Check Essential 07-08-2014 05:57 AM

Why are the pilots who still have the full defined benefit plan staying beyond age 60?
Is it a medical coverage problem?

Their pay rates as a senior captain might be pretty good but by giving up the retirement benefits they could be receiving, they are essentially working for a fraction of that pay rate.

Is it really worth the few dollars a month extra to work full time?
Help me understand the reasoning. I think if it were me, I'd be out fishing instead of working.

maddogmax 07-08-2014 06:25 AM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1679628)
Why are the pilots who still have the full defined benefit plan staying beyond age 60?
Is it a medical coverage problem?

Their pay rates as a senior captain might be pretty good but by giving up the retirement benefits they could be receiving, they are essentially working for a fraction of that pay rate.

Is it really worth the few dollars a month extra to work full time?
Help me understand the reasoning. I think if it were me, I'd be out fishing instead of working.

First, very few have a "full" defined benefit plan. Most were frozen at substantially less than anticipated. Despite Mr. Obama's claims, private health insurance is very expensive. One of the reasons I took the last early retirement package was that the company put close to $50K in a HSA for me to pay for health insurance until I turn 65. There is much more to the decision to retire than just a paycheck.

sailingfun 07-08-2014 07:06 AM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1679628)
Why are the pilots who still have the full defined benefit plan staying beyond age 60?
Is it a medical coverage problem?

Their pay rates as a senior captain might be pretty good but by giving up the retirement benefits they could be receiving, they are essentially working for a fraction of that pay rate.

Is it really worth the few dollars a month extra to work full time?
Help me understand the reasoning. I think if it were me, I'd be out fishing instead of working.

I have a friend who is a 85 hire at NW. His retirement package is about 80,000 a year from the DB plan. His currently averages 270 k a year plus the DC plan. Total over 300k. He would be very surprised to find out he is working for a fraction of his pay.

full of luv 07-08-2014 07:20 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1679663)
I have a friend who is a 85 hire at NW. His retirement package is about 80,000 a year from the DB plan. His currently averages 270 k a year plus the DC plan. Total over 300k. He would be very surprised to find out he is working for a fraction of his pay.

Wow! Kinda puts it in perspective. Easy to say retire when your making 1/3 of that with no DB.

Starcheck102 07-08-2014 07:31 AM


Originally Posted by Ferd149 (Post 1679312)
I will say this about profit sharing. I'm the only guy on here who thinks it's a bad thing..............so what does that tell ya:D

Not the only guy...

...It's just a lack of long-term memory amongst the pack. Prior to C2012, we only had one year where profit sharing had put anything meaningful in our wallets.

I think that there is more than one way to make our next contract just as valuable to pilots while removing the variables associated with profit sharing.

Does anyone honestly believe that this period of economic expansion will continue unabated? Does anyone really want their pay tied to managerial performance? I would rather eliminate uncertainty during the next downturn, and beef up our work rules, which are notoriously hard to change in negotiations.

I think this will be a tough sell to the membership. Probably an impossible sell if the projection for next year's profit sharing is correct.

I'm just one pilot, anyway, I'm sure there are about twelve thousand other guys with better ideas...

Starcheck102 07-08-2014 07:35 AM


Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 1679625)
Your numbers sounds very reasonable and you are probably right. I think they will be higher.

Thanks for the post.

And I hope you are underestimating the number. It would serve our interests.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:04 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands