![]() |
|
Originally Posted by cni187
(Post 1678948)
Hey Ferd, was it you I was supposed to see on the corner barstool at Godfather's? I met the owner instead and the tower air traffic controller. Super Stars is running a bit old for this 2010 hire. Carl are you here??!
I haven't been in Super Stars in like forever. We're mostly overflying NRT out of SEA these days. Ferd |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1679284)
Crew Tracking
800 DAL CREW |
New Email from SD:
Surface Tablets will show up for everyone (even those that opted out with the BOYD), "We estimate distribution will begin in early August and will be complete in late September." Thus, it has slipped another month to the right. This is getting ridonkuloous!!!! I'm glad Microsoft is a strategic business partners so get them to help with these stupid programs that will not work on half baked operating system that the Surface's will be running. |
Originally Posted by Ferd149
(Post 1679285)
I mostly agree except for the bold part.
I've said probably a dozen times on here that profit sharing is a scam to make you feel "like part of the organization". Give me dollars that can't be manipulated by the accountants, either in direct compensation or work rules. For the life of me, I don't know how we ever got on this profit sharing bandwagon?:confused::mad: Ferd Careful what you wish for. If we get 11% of W-2 in profit sharing and then end profit sharing and get an 11% pay increase, we net ZERO! My point is why should we give up anything? Management and their lemmings are coming for our profit sharing. They will use it to fund pathetic hourly increases and declare victory again. I'm with you, if we can get a 40% hourly increase date of signing, profit sharing can go. Does anyone think that will happen? NO CONCESSIONS |
111 retirements year to date. Can't remember the exact 2014 number of age 65 retirements. 118?
Looks like 2 to 1. IOW 1 medical/early for each age 65. |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1679200)
I could go on and on.
|
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1679298)
Fred
Careful what you wish for. If we get 11% of W-2 in profit sharing and then end profit sharing and get an 11% pay increase, we net ZERO! My point is why should we give up anything? Management and their lemmings are coming for our profit sharing. They will use it to fund pathetic hourly increases and declare victory again. I'm with you, if we can get a 40% hourly increase date of signing, profit sharing can go. Does anyone think that will happen? NO CONCESSIONS NOPE........I'm not arguing we need to make any concessions. But, profit sharing has to go! As I said, re-wicker it into other areas i.e. work rules for example that aren't taxable. Look, we paid down debt (a good thing) but that is money that isn't available for profit sharing. We paid a dividend (an OK thing if you have your stock) but it's money not available for profit sharing. We are buying back stock.........see where I'm going? As I said, we allowed management to get us into a compensation package they can manipulate and we have to get out from under it. Now is the time! Ferd PS Good to see you on here, haven't seen ya since Duke's in HNL:cool: |
Originally Posted by LOBO
(Post 1679293)
New Email from SD:
Surface Tablets will show up for everyone (even those that opted out with the BOYD), "We estimate distribution will begin in early August and will be complete in late September." Thus, it has slipped another month to the right. This is getting ridonkuloous!!!! I'm glad Microsoft is a strategic business partners so get them to help with these stupid programs that will not work on half baked operating system that the Surface's will be running. |
I will say this about profit sharing. I'm the only guy on here who thinks it's a bad thing..............so what does that tell ya:D
|
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1679300)
111 retirements year to date. Can't remember the exact 2014 number of age 65 retirements. 118?
Looks like 2 to 1. IOW 1 medical/early for each age 65. First of all, thank you for the reply PM. I agree that we must stand strong AGAINST concessions for C2015. In this time of record profits and industry health, I don't believe we should have to "trade" anything for contract improvements either. Secondly, ya gotta stop using the previous six months of this year's retirements as a "data point" to "cost future retirements." :) It just doesn't hold water. I mentioned in a previous post, you then replied, it IS NOT a linear curve, especially based on only the previous six months. Mandatory retirements are listed below: 2014: 62 2015: 170 2016: 229 2017: 287 2018: 416 2019: 511 2020: 613 With what you've stated, we should have 4576 retirements between 2014 & 2020? I wish, :D but that's not a realistic number. As someone else posted, it normally averages the mandatory retirements, PLUS 1% of the seniority list. (~120) With 62 mandatory retirements this year, plus ~120 pilots, I expect to see ~182 pilot retirements for 2014. Approximately 71 remaining retirements for 2014. (Average six/month for remainder of the year, might be slightly low.) Next year, 170 mandatory retirements, plus 120 pilots lends to the possibility of 290 (2015) pilot retirements. It's all a guess until it's in the past, but having our reps take a doubled number of retirements to the negotiating committee calling it "costed data" is doing nobody any good. Thanks for your concern, at your seniority level. (I mean that.) :) Kyle |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:52 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands