Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
A PB day is an X-day, albeit one that likely does not begin and end at midnight. It is therefore a non-fly day, and all the same rules apply. You just need to know when the X-day does end, and know that you cannot be assigned flying or short call earlier than 10 hours after that point.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Yes. Now it's a hard 16:30, but it can be manipulated. The old 16 hour thing of the past could also be manipulated though I suppose. We had our contractual maximum to protect us though. Unfortunately, we gave it away. It seems our contractual maximum is almost always more restrictive than the new FARs because it includes our 30 minute post flight while the FTD ends at blockin.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
My point is that, whether you're getting assigned a trip, or a series of trips, you look at the last 168 hours from the start of that FDP, and you need to find the 30 hours.
So, say you finish vacation on a Sunday, and had back-to-back trips (4-day and a 3-day) starting at 1600 on Monday, and you had several layovers during the week, but no break =/> 30 hours. It's now Sunday morning, and you have a FDP that starts at 0900, and ends at 1800.
You're thinking you're illegal, because during the entire week, including the FDP you're about to start, you didn't have 30 hours break.
Except that 168 hours back from the START of that last FDP takes you back to the previous Sunday at 0900. From that moment, to the start of your first FDP on Monday, you actually had 31 hours rest.
Legal, IMO.
So you need 30 hours in 168 to START a FDP, not by the end of the FDP. Meaning, IOW, that you need "30 in 168 PLUS a FDP", which feels a lot like "30 in 7.5 days", or "30 in 7 days plus a workday", or a little like "30 in 8".
So, say you finish vacation on a Sunday, and had back-to-back trips (4-day and a 3-day) starting at 1600 on Monday, and you had several layovers during the week, but no break =/> 30 hours. It's now Sunday morning, and you have a FDP that starts at 0900, and ends at 1800.
You're thinking you're illegal, because during the entire week, including the FDP you're about to start, you didn't have 30 hours break.
Except that 168 hours back from the START of that last FDP takes you back to the previous Sunday at 0900. From that moment, to the start of your first FDP on Monday, you actually had 31 hours rest.
Legal, IMO.
So you need 30 hours in 168 to START a FDP, not by the end of the FDP. Meaning, IOW, that you need "30 in 168 PLUS a FDP", which feels a lot like "30 in 7.5 days", or "30 in 7 days plus a workday", or a little like "30 in 8".
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Be careful out there and always triple check their work.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Assuming that we're talking about the FDP limit, the Captain can agree to go as much as two hours beyond that (to 14 in this case), so long as two conditions have been met:
1) You have not extended more than :30 beyond an FDP since receiving your last rest of 30 hours or more, and
2) The extension would cause you to exceed a cumulative FDP limit such as 60 in 168.
The release should show a Latest Allowable Takeoff Time (LATT) that would comply with the FDP limit, as well as one that complies with the longest legal extension for the crew. It is then up to the Captain to determine whether to agree to an extension and, if so, for how long.
1) You have not extended more than :30 beyond an FDP since receiving your last rest of 30 hours or more, and
2) The extension would cause you to exceed a cumulative FDP limit such as 60 in 168.
The release should show a Latest Allowable Takeoff Time (LATT) that would comply with the FDP limit, as well as one that complies with the longest legal extension for the crew. It is then up to the Captain to determine whether to agree to an extension and, if so, for how long.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
Had a dispatcher in the JS recently and brought this up. He got very defensive and basically said they were going to do whatever paper pusher trick they could to make it look legal and get you to accept it. Everything. Unrealistic taxi times, redline climb, cruise and descent, direct routing, whatever they needed to make it look legal. Hopefully you push and once you do I think the theory is you will almost always go unless you encounter additional delays, even though there's no way you will actually make it on time even if you're number one for takeoff at pushback time because the math behind the plan is essentially impossible, but you won't figure that out til you're airborne and by then you're going. They can always self disclose and leave you holding the bag as the rogue pilot.
Be careful out there and always triple check their work.
Be careful out there and always triple check their work.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
I suppose. Although I'm not sure who that was directed at.
He said they were doing that, I said that was highly illegal and should be refused in all cases (the extent he was saying they would do it…I'm not talking about bumping the cost index to find 2 minutes on a 3 hour flight, as that *could* be legit) and he huffed and puffed and basically double dog dared us to challenge it because he apparently felt he had the weight of the company on his side.
I don't think any of that was the dispatch department coming up with anything on its own. Things like that are usually either directed or strongly implied from above. However I doubt it came from Flt Ops leadership.
We are running a great on time operation and running very thin at the same time. That is a classic standing threat if ever there was one. There will be some amount of pilot pushing at any company. The point is watch your back, check their work and if its not right (or realistic) expand your team and protect yourself. At the end of the day, you're protecting the company as well in doing so.
He said they were doing that, I said that was highly illegal and should be refused in all cases (the extent he was saying they would do it…I'm not talking about bumping the cost index to find 2 minutes on a 3 hour flight, as that *could* be legit) and he huffed and puffed and basically double dog dared us to challenge it because he apparently felt he had the weight of the company on his side.
I don't think any of that was the dispatch department coming up with anything on its own. Things like that are usually either directed or strongly implied from above. However I doubt it came from Flt Ops leadership.
We are running a great on time operation and running very thin at the same time. That is a classic standing threat if ever there was one. There will be some amount of pilot pushing at any company. The point is watch your back, check their work and if its not right (or realistic) expand your team and protect yourself. At the end of the day, you're protecting the company as well in doing so.
What if the FO unilaterally decides not to accept the extension? Does she/he have to lie and say "fatigue" or "sick" (and then be subjected to the side effects of making either of those calls) or do they have the ability to merely say they are not accepting the extension like the CA has the right, button up their jacket, walk away and go to the hotel with impunity?
According to the duty pilot that night, EACH pilot has to make the determination whether or not they will extend. Even if the captain decides to Boy Scout it, the FO can say, "nope, not gonna do it," and walk. You, as in every pilot, are the only one who can make the determination about extending or not.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




