Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1685590)

Bingo. UA and US have been hiring like gangbusters for years now- A 2011 hire at US can hold the 330. Is that due to C2012, too?

Originally Posted by Alan Shore (Post 1685580)

It's been my impression that our reps have no issue with varying points of view

Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1685573)

I don't need credibility.

Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1685593)

I thought Delta pilots were responsible for all good things?

Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1685601)

The entrenched MEC bureaucrats are the guys who won't tolerate dissent or alternate views.

Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1685550)

That depends. If you stick to your typical "influence via insult" ways and violate the TOS, then yes your post would be deleted. If you feel you can provide proof to counter the fact that C2012 did not cost less than the previous contract(added $268 million dollars Day 1 & $3 billion over 3 years) without violating the TOS, then your post can stay.

I'll wait.

Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1685603)

of course not. and it's a good thing, because you have none.


Keep up the good work, 3bil.

Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1685575)

My evidence has already been presented to the pilot group ad nauseum.

Originally Posted by GunshipGuy (Post 1685616)

What? Proof is now one of the requirements here?

This goes for both sides, but I do find it amusing that Johnson used it against one who would dare question DALPA.