![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1685620)
I agree, 3bil, that mantra has induced nausea. But that doesn't make it true.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1685629)
Once again, still waiting to YOU to prove otherwise. Stop deflecting, and back your claim.
You can't make this stuff up. |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1685631)
3bil, let me get this straight. You can post any bogus numbers you want without proof, but I need to prove that you're wrong.
You can't make this stuff up. |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1685624)
Sure. Why request proof to back one's claim? Does Carl not ask for it all the time when rebutting sailingfun? Or alfaromeo? Do you question when he wants proof? Am I truly the first participant on this thread to ask for proof?
Edit: Perfect example--you're citing proof but you're not providing it. Where's your proof? I'm not doubting you; I'm just pointing out that you're not providing a link, or anything other than saying it was stated somewhere and the reader has only your word to go on. If you were providing proof you'd give us a link. So you're doing exactly what you're complaining Purple is guilty of. You're not providing proof. http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7433/8...7a6ec11d_o.jpg |
Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
(Post 1685638)
But you're threatening to and saying you require it as a precondition to allow a post to stand or risk deleting it. I'm saying I've seen plenty of claims from many sides here and never was there a threat that they provide proof or risk being removed. Granted, your statement threatening removal included compliance with the TOS, but you also required proof. Seems you should apply that requirement to those you agree with as well if you're going to throw that out there.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1685639)
No. My precondition is that he not violate the TOS, and it's actually not my precondition. It's what he agreed to when he registered as a user on APC. If your claim were true, every post of his since our discussion began would be deleted.
|
The Last 10 pages of L&G for those that don't have the time to read very post:
DALPA sucks. DALPA rules. DPA sucks. DPA rules. You suck. We all suck? Babe Ruth was the greatest Baseball player. We need to get rid of profit sharing. We need to keep profit sharing. Lou Gehrig gave the greatest sports speech. Tarantino sucks. Tarantino rules. Snatch was awesome (Guy Ritchie BTW, not Tarantino). C-12 Was awesome - we are now hiring like gangbusters. C-12 Was a sellout - imagine how much more we would be hiring without it. Awesome movement with the new TA. Imagine how much more movement we would have had without C-12. And a fine picture of under-butt. Sorry you will have to use your imagination or memory here - I don't know how to re-post a picture in the middle of a post. :( Finally some movement in the provinces (lands west of the Mississippi denoted by sea monsters on charts of old). Please feel free to add to the list if I missed anything. Oh Yeah - something about some guy getting "crappy" schedules every time he used the back-door. :eek: Scoop :D |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1685590)
Bingo. UA and US have been hiring like gangbusters for years now- A 2011 hire at US can hold the 330. Is that due to C2012, too?
Why, yes! Of course it is! http://www.pressingsave.com/golfpro/...illy-Wonka.jpg Says Alan Shore. |
I've been eagerly perusing the last ten pages, and seen much mention of the Backdoor, and the term butthead being paraphrased much, but alas, no fine under-butt.
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1685649)
The Last 10 pages of L&G ...
And a fine picture of under-butt. |
Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
(Post 1685646)
No, you also added he provide proof or his post would be deleted.
If this is a grammar lesson from you, is it free? Can we start regular tutoring sessions? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:41 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands