Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2014, 05:33 AM
  #163481  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
MD88,

"Dissent" about what our MEC and pilots have already ratified is a waste of time.
I disagree. "Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it." If we don't learn from what our MEC and pilots have already ratified, then how do we ever achieve anything going forward that even remotely resembles restoration of our profession and our careers? How do we get our MEC to begin pursuing an objective like that if we don't make it clear that their current course and expectations are unacceptable?

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
There is a distinct difference between dissent and vindictiveness. The DPA's error is that it failed to find that line and stay on the correct side of it.
That's not just a DPA problem. That line has been crossed on both sides numerous times. Fortunately, it's not the norm on either side. But it does make a convenient straw man if you (not necessarily you, Bar) are wanting to silence one side or the other.

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Not saying that is you ... but we waste a lot of time debating C2012 while our Virgin JV is being negotiated, our Trans-Atlantic JV is in peril and we prepare for C2015.
I don't think it's a waste of time. In terms of JV's, I guess it's a waste of time. I agree JV's are important, but there's more to C2015 than just JV's. If you're unconcerned with restoring our pay, then I guess "debating C2012" is a waste of time. Obviously, I don't think it's a waste of time. Again, we need to be learning from our mistakes not repeating them.

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Yeah, Tim and Scrappy went off the reservation. The MEC ratified the result and the pilots voted yes. So, would it satisfy people if we just kept Tim out?
That by itself wouldn't satisfy me but it would be a good start. Guys like Tim, Scrappy, "Alfa," slowplay," etc. are the antithesis of what I think we should be working to achieve. Their strategic plan and mindset has set us back years and set us up to make it impossible to recover the lost value of our careers. That's my opinion. I guess that sort of opinion is viewed as confrontational, over the top, and out of bounds here on APC now?
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 07-22-2014, 05:40 AM
  #163482  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

OK 737 drivers I need some info...... What headsets are popular with the Delta guppy crowd?
NWA320pilot is offline  
Old 07-22-2014, 06:16 AM
  #163483  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,154
Default

Originally Posted by NWA320pilot View Post
OK 737 drivers I need some info...... What headsets are popular with the Delta guppy crowd?
Telex 850 served me well for the year I was on it. Lightweight, no batteries, and relatively inexpensive. There were 2 or 3 ship numbers that produced some sort of squealing feedback when transmitting, but I worked around that by wearing the headset and then using the handmic to transmit <---pretty rare occurrence given the size of the fleet.

It is by far the loudest flight deck I've worked. The unfortunate part is most crews don't talk via the intercom, which involves a rubber band, so you will inevitably end up pulling the inboard earcup off, resulting in pre-mature, asymmetrical deafness. So for me it wasn't really worth buying an expensive headset to only use 50% of its capability.
LeineLodge is offline  
Old 07-22-2014, 06:37 AM
  #163484  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Look acl, you simply have to correct this. I know there are some daisies here who hate it when I come after you the way I would like to right now, so I'll hold back.

Our JV is out of balance RIGHT NOW. Has been since March. We're now in the correction period, yet you and the rest of DALPA has been dead silent. Those are actual facts, and I KNOW you know it. So why did you say what you said above?

Carl
Carl;

Read the PWA. It states that at the end of the three year measurement period, the company has one year to cure the deficit. IE, they are not out of compliance until the end of the cure period. No judge or arbitrator is going to side with labor if you file a grievance before the end of the one year measurement period. The non-compliance does not occur until the end of the cure period. Plain and simple.

We can agree or disagree about the language of the PWA and if it does or does not need to be changed, but what that does not do is change the language DAL is contractually held to. There is not non-compliance until the end of the cure period.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 07-22-2014, 06:39 AM
  #163485  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
This is troubling since I know you know better. DALPA was asked by its members why they omitted our JV competitors in the contract comparisons leading up to C2012. ALPA had that pay data. ALPA said they did not want to publish it. They said their reason was that they were asked not to...while not producing any evidence of such communication. I found Air France's pay data in one minute and posted it here. It had everything to do with "didn't want." ALPA had the data, but didn't want to put it in the contract comparisons.



ALPA had the data. So did I. I published it here, ALPA wouldn't.



Read above and you'll this statement of yours is completely false. And since you're a current rep, that troubles me. I would have hoped as a current rep you would be fighting hard for an open and completely transparent contract comparison. Instead, you're here now setting us up for why we will yet again NOT see our JV competitors' contract details in our contract comparisons...even though ALPA has the data.



We don't know if that's a fact acl. It's clearly you're opinion, but please don't confuse your personal opinions with fact.

Carl

You miss the point. ALPA does have the data, but the pay data that you have from the internet is just one part of it. ALPA does have the data, but they had to agree not to publish it to see it. ALPA has stated that the data is not as clear as you like to state it to be.

I have not seen the data FWIW.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 07-22-2014, 06:42 AM
  #163486  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post


PAY ME! PAY ME! I'm out of here in 5 years, Contract 2000, restoration, PLUS INTEREST! Pay Me! DPA, DPA, Contract 2012 wasn't anywhere near enough, PAY ME, I'm not thinking ahead and not supporting my union either, PAY ME.



Oh, what's that I hear?




Folks, what I am advocating here is:
  • Support ALPA, your Reps and Volunteers who work for you
  • Support ALPA PAC
  • Think carefully about your survey responses
  • Consider that scope nets you more actual pay through advancement than having $1 above whatever arbitrary metric, or contract comparison from a decade and a half ago you might have in mind.
  • Just think; remember that Delta is a holding company of alter ego stacked on alter ego and the easy play is simply to move flying around to the flavor of the day while allocating costs to the "bad boys."
  • Hold ALPA accountable for results. Learn about the Candidates. Know how your Reps vote. We, as members of the association fail the association when we let things like Endeavor's negotiations go unchallenged. We need to keep a very close watch on this transatlantic JV.


Bar, good points. I would also not state your last the way you have. Those negotiations and results did not go unchallenged, it was not the majority position to challenge them more formally. There was plenty of discussion and back and forth on this issue last year, and some of it was in plenary in DC. I think you heard about that.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 07-22-2014, 06:48 AM
  #163487  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Oberon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 757/767
Posts: 588
Default

Originally Posted by DFW Refugee View Post
Oberon:

When's your TOE? Consider:

--Calling the transport company direct. Any static from them, suggest their driver may not be happy later.

--Call the LCA and let him know you may be late, and why.

--Call the Pilot Support Center, and ask for support...let them stay on hold with crew accommodations.

--Call scheds and tell them you can't fly---> your ear's still sore.

Good Luck and have FUN!

DFW
I was scheduled to take a 2:46 van today but I was able to talk to Crew Accommodations (finally) yesterday and get it changed to 2:00. I did my due diligence today and called the van company only to discover that my van time had not been changed. He told me there was a 1:45 van which I'll take. I called Crew Accommodations again to tell them to cancel my original van.

The 1:45 van works because a bottle of mouthwash soiled my extra shirt and I need to stop by the Flight Station (or whatever its called). Hopefully it works out.

Thanks for the help!
Oberon is offline  
Old 07-22-2014, 06:59 AM
  #163488  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,879
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver View Post
I've been on this board for a lot of years but don't keep up with it all that consistently anymore, so maybe I missed something. But I don't see the discussions taking place the past few days/weeks to be any different than any number of discussions we've had over the past years. It appears to me that a lot of the complaints about this thread the past couple of days are really just an attempt to silence dissent.

If you guys want to turn it into strictly a rumor thread, answer a few questions, post a few pictures, exchange BBQ recipes, etc., then I guess that's fine. It'll be one less thing to occupy a slice of my time... which is probably a good thing. Think about it. I can live with whatever you guys decide.


DAL,

I don't think that is what is going on here. I have been on this thread for years also and every once in a while it takes a downturn. Page after page of back and forth with insults, condescension, and degradation thrown in old can get old real fast. (I am not talking about anyone in particular here - see below regarding nuance).

Dissent is needed on this thread. It would be pretty boring with everyone agreeing with each other. What a lot of guys, including myself, don't like to see are the personal insults.

A lot of communication is nonverbal - we lose that on an internet forum and often guys go high and right at the drop of a hat and then berate and belittle fellow DAL pilots. Sometimes this is out of genuine disagreement, but sometimes it is from the lack of nuance we have on the forum. I don't understand why oftentimes many are not willing to give a fellow DAL Pilot the benefit of the doubt.

In either case it is wrong to get personal, and most guys will not even read these posts past a certain point. The poster who sticks to the facts with a well thought out and analytical post will be the first to change anothers opinion on this forum (if that is even possible ).

I really appreciate the divers points of view even though I don't always agree with them.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 07-22-2014, 07:01 AM
  #163489  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Permanently scarred
Posts: 1,707
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
Carl;

Read the PWA. It states that at the end of the three year measurement period, the company has one year to cure the deficit. IE, they are not out of compliance until the end of the cure period. No judge or arbitrator is going to side with labor if you file a grievance before the end of the one year measurement period. The non-compliance does not occur until the end of the cure period. Plain and simple.

We can agree or disagree about the language of the PWA and if it does or does not need to be changed, but what that does not do is change the language DAL is contractually held to. There is not non-compliance until the end of the cure period.
Too bad we didn't bring in some outside consultants to point out to the NC how this language was ripe for abuse. Oh, forgot, we did this on purpose because in-house expertise can and will not be out done. Those silly Fortune 500 companies could learn a thing or two about wasting money on consultants.
GunshipGuy is offline  
Old 07-22-2014, 07:13 AM
  #163490  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A330
Posts: 216
Default

It was only a matter of time.... no more TLV

Delta Air Lines Newsroom - News Archive
rahc is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices