Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2014, 05:52 AM
  #164801  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager View Post
Go fly a 737 before you say that. Sad to think a 900 is the 757 replacement. The thing is really underwhelming. Nicest thing I can say about it.

I have 5000 hours in 73s..... and probably where I'll wind up by the time we are finished getting rid of bigger. But I agree, it's no 757, not by a longshot.
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-02-2014, 05:56 AM
  #164802  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: DL new hire
Posts: 43
Default

Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
Are you worse off now than you were six years ago?
In most every way.
pnkqtrbkpnk is offline  
Old 08-02-2014, 05:57 AM
  #164803  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
Who the crap cares about aircraft type? Are you that childish? Is this a NASCAR race where we're cheering for a chevy or a ford? Airbus, Boeing.... we fly them and get paid.

None of this changes the fact that we actively codeshare with these carriers. They are flying people that bought tickets from the company that employs us. I didn't like flying the 737, but you don't see me making statements that I'd never get caught dead flying it. This is not about an airplane type- this is about scope. We are rapidly parking 25% of our largest fleet type with no replacement on property (apparently the 333IGW will be the capacity replacement when it gets here via reading between the lines), while our codeshare partners expand their "premium" fleets.

You don't care about small end scope, and I get that since it is mostly self mitigating at this point in time (the pendulum will swing the other way). However, this is top end jobs at DL being whisked away actively. Korean Air believes they should be doing all the Pacific flying. You've heard RA say that at the meetings.

So... where do we go from here? You constantly harp on hopey changey stuff yet you have presented so few ideas of your own- just mostly insults to others. Let's hear it, t. What can we do with the dynamics of the last few days other than ride the wave?
You answered your entire diatribe with your very first sentence, quoted again below to jog your memory. THe answer to that question is certainly not me, but the bigger pays more crowd. I have offered my solution, but you ain't interested. Enjoy the downsizing "wave we get to ride" now. The only thing that could possibly change all this and make it moot is a big WB order that makes it all up in shear numbers. But you can bet your bippy that it ain't gonna be a bunch of 777s or 747-800s.

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
Who the crap cares about aircraft type?
I don't. And my entire TIC commentary was solely aimed at how ugly that airplane is. I couldn't care less how much it pays.

Oh, and one last thing. Our scope has NOTHING to do with what airplane they buy. Not... one... damn... thing. They are gonna buy what they are gonna buy. You cannot force them to buy 777s, 787s or CRJs. You can only force them to use us to either fly those airplanes, or control who does. But the thing is, DAL is a multi national, global operating corporation, and it is unbelievably naive to think that our pilot group could do every single hour of flying for this company. We can do the lion's share, but not all of it. THAT is what scope is all about.

I turn the rant back over to you.
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-02-2014, 06:04 AM
  #164804  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by satchip View Post
Neither party is pilot friendly. We are not Labor, at least not the Labor the Dems favor. We are above median income, and tend to vote conservative as a group. They are interested in the Government Employees unions and the Service Employees Unions. So to say that the Ds are more "labor friendly" may be true but they ain't talking about us.

The Republicans (not RINOS) may not be labor friendly but they are for policies that foster growth and a robust economy. Since our jobs hinge on such an economy you can say that Conservative policies espoused by some Republicans is more pilot friendly than the stagnation culture of dependency established by the Dems. I submit into evidence the last 6 years.

Now if we could find a party or politician that would fight to repeal or remove us from the RLA? That would be pilot friendly.

And Buzz I'm with you. I don't contribute to the PAC because of the list of candidates they support. I remember seeing Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid at the top of the list lately. Not gonna do it. Wouldn't be prudent....
+717.......................
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-02-2014, 06:08 AM
  #164805  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
Are you worse off now than you were six years ago?

That's a loaded question. Tha answer is most certainly a loaded gun pointed straight at us. Financially, on an individual basis, I certainly am better than I was because our contract is better than it was 6 years ago. But the party in power has unleashed policy on this country (not only in the form of the "ACA") that will not truly be felt for several more years, and the damages of which will not be undone for generations.
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-02-2014, 06:25 AM
  #164806  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
I like the idea of staffing for the flying whether or not the flights are flown. That fixes the problem going forward. The past infractions can be monetized since you can't retroactively staff.

I think this is achievable in the negotiation/grievance process. Carl mentioned ending the JV but I doubt an arbitrator would force the company to stop commerce. The punishment doesn't fit the crime and it doesn't even really help Delta pilots.

Oberon gets it.
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-02-2014, 06:40 AM
  #164807  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Oberon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 757/767
Posts: 588
Default

Originally Posted by pnkqtrbkpnk View Post
In most every way.
Care to elaborate?
Oberon is offline  
Old 08-02-2014, 06:49 AM
  #164808  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by jabwmu View Post
Pay question.

Does a line holder get paid half the reserve guarantee or half the AVL on the end of the month paycheck?

Thanks.
PWA Section 3. G. 1.: "An end-of-month (EOM) partial payment on the last business day of the corresponding calendar month in the amount of one-half of the reserve guarantee at his composite hourly pay rate as of the date of the payment, and..."
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 08-02-2014, 06:54 AM
  #164809  
Gets Weekends Off
 
satchip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Flying the SEC
Posts: 2,350
Default

Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
Are you worse off now than you were six years ago?
It depends on how you measure it. Financially? Most definitely. But I am highly educated, have an unique, highly sought after skill set, and benefit from a contract that raised my compensation dramatically in the last 6 years. In 2008 I was a new hire making 60 an hour. Now I make twice that.

The average American does not have those advantages and has suffered greatly. The real unemployment rate is still double digits and some of those that are employed are working part time or multiple part time jobs. 92 million people aren't working in this country, 11.5 million more than in 2008. And the population has grown all those years.

As for T's point about the ACA, I, as a military retiree, am somewhat insulated from that fiasco, for now. But that is a liberty stealing fiscal suitcase nuke waiting to explode. Why do you think O has delayed and waived that law countless times?

Liberty wise, we are much less free than we were 6 years ago. I think the damage done to the Constitution and our previously limited government may never be undone. I blame both sides for that.
satchip is offline  
Old 08-02-2014, 07:00 AM
  #164810  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default



See. If Boeing would just get with the program they would realize they need three engines on their extended FLUF jets and move the engines to the tail to have more ground clearance.

forgot to bid is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices