![]() |
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1814309)
I don't think they publish it for consumption anymore than we do.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1814322)
OK - so, what is the track record of your sources' reliability on the performance of the Oil Refinery and Fuel Hedging? How about capacity?
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1814322)
Everyone wants to know the future. Unfortunately, forward-looking statements are notoriously unreliable.
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1814322)
There are also tremendous variables in how costing data is applied. If money were saved on aircraft maintenance and allocated to pilot pay, the net result could still (arguably) be "cost-neutral."
It still amazes me how hard some of you guys still fight against that statement, and changing the subject seems to be your chief method of response. Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1814354)
It still amazes me how hard some of you guys still fight against that statement, and changing the subject seems to be your chief method of response.
Carl
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1814317)
Richard, Ed and Campbell did that. That's why they referred to our contract as "cost neutral" during investment interviews. They went further to state that the savings realized by the pilots contract would allow them to invest in initiatives that benefit other employee groups at Delta.
We could all do that if we had the costing sheets agreed to during negotiations. Management has them and so does DALPA. Neither one will release them. If they did release the costing sheets, we could all do the math and see why it is that our management calls our contract "cost neutral." Carl Not necessarily. If money is saved from another part of the operation and applied to pilot pay, the net number may be "cost neutral" but to we pilots, it is a gain. In the case of C2012 management reported savings from up gauging the operation and saving on maintenance expense. ALPA, generally, tries to stay away from forward-looking projections and stick to real, after the fact, measured results. You can tell us how your pay has worked out since C2012. My Delta W2 delta between years has been (without changing equipment or bidding status): 2011 - Baseline 2012 - 4% 2013 - 27.5% 2014 - 80% Frankly; when I just ran these numbers they surprised me (income from other jobs outside of Delta has declined, offsetting gains). My best guess is the other factors involved are longevity bumps and the ability to pick up a green slip every other month or so. Because of my other hobbies, I never get more than a one or two-day greenie. All in I fly+credit between 75 and 95 a month. Contract 2012's scope was a very definite improvement for the pilots which could be reported to investors as "cost neutral" or perhaps even accretive to the Company's bottom line. Using unit cost analysis, flying a passenger on a 717 may be more efficient to Delta than an old CRJ with a topped out crew, but for the new 717 Captain at Delta going to nearly $200 an hour is usually a big raise. Not sure who you mean by "you guys." You and I are both Delta pilots. I voted against C2012, but with the clarity of 20/20 hindsight it worked well. C2012 was certainly preferable to stagnation. Continued up gauging will benefit both the pilots and Delta. I get the feeling (subjectively) that the push for C2015 is going to be improvements that you feel more on your end of the seniority list (which will benefit all of us). |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1814351)
Both sides published openers for C2K, and I think the same was true for the 1113 proceedings. Regardless, we can ask our reps after openers are exchanged. I just think we're chronologically and philosophically challenged, when we anticipate their needs. Thankfully, APC isn't much of a statistically significant tool, otherwise what we're doing right now is negotiating against ourselves.
We also had Pro and Con papers for C2000 which I thought were great. It would be great to see them again although I am not holding my breath. :cool: Scoop |
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 1814186)
Just AWESOME. Most profitable time in the airlines history with no end in sight, debt down by 50-70% and you guys are taking about concessions!
No wonder we get "cost neutral" contracts. No need to solve the company's problems. |
Delta Current Fleet Plan
Looks pretty good. :)
Mainline up 100 aircraft! Straight math based on a current Pilot count of 12,000 would require about 1500 more Pilots. Thats 500 Pilots per year for growth plus retirements. Scoop Don't know what happened to the format - it lined up right until the time I hit save. Delta Fleet Size as of Projected Fleet Size January 9, 2015 in 2018 Domestic 630 Domestic 718 Transoceanic 142 Transoceanic 154 Total Main Line 772 Total Main Line 872 Regional 499 Regional 420 Total Aircraft 1,271 Total Aircraft 1292 |
For Denny...
|
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1814351)
Both sides published openers for C2K, and I think the same was true for the 1113 proceedings. Regardless, we can ask our reps after openers are exchanged. I just think we're chronologically and philosophically challenged, when we anticipate their needs. Thankfully, APC isn't much of a statistically significant tool, otherwise what we're doing right now is negotiating against ourselves.
So you want to wait for something that isn't going to happen to happen before we talk about pros and cons of certain concepts? If APC isn't a statistically significant tool and not causing the pilot group to negotiate against itself, then why can't we talk here about the contract again? |
In C12, it was widely reported that the company opened with 0% raises. The company came to ALPA to get an early deal, but offered 0%! Yet ALPA didn't walk out.
If the company brings any sort of insulting nonsense like that this time, after publicly yearning for an early deal, I hope ALPA has the stores (and common sense) to walk away for a good while. |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1814422)
In C12, it was widely reported that the company opened with 0% raises. The company came to ALPA to get an early deal, but offered 0%! Yet ALPA didn't walk out.
If the company brings any sort of insulting nonsense like that this time, after publicly yearning for an early deal, I hope ALPA has the stores (and common sense) to walk away for a good while. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:41 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands