![]() |
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1814108)
751 as of 01JAN15.
For reference, we were at 767 mainline jets at the merger. |
Thanks for the answers!
Denny |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 1814117)
Thanks for the answers!
Denny |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1814111)
The company shows 772 as of 9 Jan. One interesting thing is the A350 delivery schedule appears to be very aggressive with 15 airframes coming in a 18 month time frame. (July 17 to Dec 18)
|
Quick question cause I wasn't able to find it anywhere else. Have 4 days resv followed by CQ, followed by one day of resv. Do I need the 30 / 7 during during the first 4 days of resv, or does the deadhead to ATL not count? Basically it's 8 days in a row with company business.
Thx |
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 1814038)
I completely agree, but you do have to admit that it encourages abuse based upon the use it or lose it provision.
Best system I've seen is a bank provision that rolls over unused hours and allows you to sell back any hours over 3 years worth of hours at 50%. Solves the use it or lose it spike in May, and doesn't encourage you to come to work sick because if I'm sick I will stay home for 100% vs. coming to work and getting 50% later on. No sick program is going to make everyone happy though so I think some of us will always think something else is better.
Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
(Post 1814087)
Did you really have to put Jesse in with those two? That just ain't right.
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1814098)
Shiz,
Jesse is good people. He should be allowed to stay. It's that 80ktsclamp.... that guy... http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lr...36zqo1_500.gif Free Gun... ...I mean Jesse! |
Originally Posted by crewdawg52
(Post 1814130)
Quick question cause I wasn't able to find it anywhere else. Have 4 days resv followed by CQ, followed by one day of resv. Do I need the 30 / 7 during during the first 4 days of resv, or does the deadhead to ATL not count? Basically it's 8 days in a row with company business.
Thx |
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 1814055)
Yeah, I'll take that. I said earlier that a program that allows us to bank and sell some back would be better. Critics of that type of policy say it encourages flying sick which to some extent I would agree. If you had to sell it back at 50%, that would eliminate that for anyone who wasn't stupid.
Bottom line is that it's really tough to build an effective policy that both encourages/enables people to stay home when they're sick while discouraging abuse by either/both workers or/and employer. The 50% is a good compromise idea. So on a related topic, I've heard some strategies of bidding reserve for a month you've got vacation, but since I've got 2 weeks vacation in May, maybe not a great idea? |
Originally Posted by Flying Elvis
(Post 1814133)
117 it says you can't start a period of reserve flight duty without the lookback. DH and sims without intent for flight doesn't count as reserve or flight duty according to the definitions (117.3). However, they are company duty, so that last day of reserve is effectively dead unless they put you in rest at the front end.
|
Originally Posted by Flying Elvis
(Post 1814138)
I like that idea. B6 has a 150% sellback and I thought I saw a lot more guys flying sick than I've seen so far at DAL (zero, maybe 1), though admittedly both sample sizes are small. But B6 also has a single pool of PTO for sick, vacation, etc, which is a turd.
Bottom line is that it's really tough to build an effective policy that both encourages/enables people to stay home when they're sick while discouraging abuse by either/both workers or/and employer. The 50% is a good compromise idea. So on a related topic, I've heard some strategies of bidding reserve for a month you've got vacation, but since I've got 2 weeks vacation in May, maybe not a great idea?
Sort of a bank system since you get to "make some bank" with it, but also gives us more sick time over a career (240/yr DAL way, versus 70-100/yr with a traditional bank). I don't like a pure bank because it encourages flying sick because "I gotta build up my sick bank"... Stay home if you are ill!!!! It also offsets the pilots who burn their bank at the end of their career and use it as an "early retirement plan".... Hmmm, 50 hours x 30 year career is 1500 hours, and it's been invested steadily over that time... (there's your early retirement plan!) It would probably reduce overall sick usage, but increase the overall cost.. Depends what the Company wants more, stability and efficiency for a higher cost, or less reliability and less efficiency for a lower cost. Oh screw it, just pay us a LOT more, the sick leave can stay the way it is! :D |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:33 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands