![]() |
Originally Posted by smitty145
(Post 711181)
How many airplanes do they need to "grow" for new 70+ seaters to replace the -30s and -40s?
|
For something completely different... Bored out of my skull, I decided to peruse ATL777B open time, you know, to see how the other half lives. We've got a bunch of flights going to Lima. What's going on down there that requires a 777? I've never been there but I can't imagine it being that big a market. Is it cargo, performance?
|
Originally Posted by upndsky
(Post 711210)
For something completely different... Bored out of my skull, I decided to peruse ATL777B open time, you know, to see how the other half lives. We've got a bunch of flights going to Lima. What's going on down there that requires a 777? I've never been there but I can't imagine it being that big a market. Is it cargo, performance?
|
We need it for Cargo.
|
And gold. And speed so it has a better chance of connecting with the NRT flight.
|
Yes, it seems that ATL is one of the best connecting points from NRT to South America.
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 711231)
Yes, it seems that ATL is one of the best connecting points from NRT to South America.
|
To use RA's words, There is no point in acquiring Alaska when we already get all the benefits of ownership!
|
Originally Posted by upndsky
(Post 711148)
2. The company is planning on a big uptick in narrow body flying (DC-9, MD88, 73N and A320). While the SLC M90 base is going to MSP, Wilbur said the plan is that there won't be a big displacement of MSP 320 to SLC. Rather, those SLC 320 slots will be filled by the increase in narrow body flying. IOW, the MSP 320 base won't shrink as much as one might think, which would reduce the ripple down effect a MD has on the system. . |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 711241)
To use RA's words, There is no point in acquiring Alaska when we already get all the benefits of ownership!
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:11 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands