![]() |
|
Good point on the training/fleet productivity, btw.
|
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1879010)
Disagree on the WS/GS. In fact it hosed me just last month. Waited for the GS and they ended up sending FOUR rotations to OOB RES and the in base pilots with a GS in ended up with nothing. Nonroations went out on WS or GS for the next three days. Ouch, but YMMV.
As to your UPS/FDX/SWA contract tidbits, please try not to change the subject, I am referring to their pace of negotiations in Section 6 under the RLA, and how the NMB is handling their situations. (As an aside, like you, I see things those three have that would be nice here, but I definitely dislike other parts.) My point on SWA, UPS and FDX is that over the long term a little persistence and patience will be rewarded. They are in a drawn out situation temporarily, but are winning long term. We need the same long term focus. Jumping on these single digit pay raises while giving away our careers is killing us. The JV alone will keep many of us in lower paying categories for longer periods of time. If we had the same pay rates with improved scope, there would be a larger mix of pilots getting widebody pay rates. The TA process can be uncomfortable, but as a group I believe we have the strength and fortitude to endure a little uncertainty and discomfort while working toward our goal of an industry leading contract. I would love a quick deal, but only on terms that make sense for the pilot group. I'm optimistic we can get a good TA, but would hope everyone is prepared to be patient if the first one we are presented doesn't meet our standards. |
Originally Posted by Gunfighter
(Post 1879115)
The GS example was NYC 7ER F/O over Memorial Day. We can do a post mortum and review that logic in two weeks. Were you a NYC 7ER F/O when you missed out on a GS. I've seen them going to OOB GS and IA in that category consistently for the last few weeks. My point is we are in an advantageous position and shouldn't jump at the first thing that looks marginally OK. We can survive a protracted negotiation especially with 3B4 to help keep us on par with AA and UAL. Do you know how much of a pay raise that triggers based on AA and UAL average 757 pay? I haven't done the math, but it helps.
My point on SWA, UPS and FDX is that over the long term a little persistence and patience will be rewarded. They are in a drawn out situation temporarily, but are winning long term. We need the same long term focus. Jumping on these single digit pay raises while giving away our careers is killing us. The JV alone will keep many of us in lower paying categories for longer periods of time. If we had the same pay rates with improved scope, there would be a larger mix of pilots getting widebody pay rates. The TA process can be uncomfortable, but as a group I believe we have the strength and fortitude to endure a little uncertainty and discomfort while working toward our goal of an industry leading contract. I would love a quick deal, but only on terms that make sense for the pilot group. I'm optimistic we can get a good TA, but would hope everyone is prepared to be patient if the first one we are presented doesn't meet our standards. I haven't read any convincing explanation yet as to why this needs to move so fast, but obviously there is some leverage in delivering it. The value of waiting isn't real clear, but it looks pretty good, so a deal has to be right. |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1879030)
Trip,
Please show me where I've ever mentioned retro anything. You weren't here for the sacrifices that made this company what it is. You are riding coat tails and preaching. If I ever meet you in person, you will be the first new hire I didn't pick up the tab for. There is a line, you are over it. |
Originally Posted by NERD
(Post 1879079)
Sailing, Alpha, Slow, Shiz. Since y'all seem to be in the know with management connections, I have a question. Supposedly RA is saying we don't fly enough and are not productive. How does the company calculate the sick leave used?
Hours or days used. IE: call in sick for a 4 day and call in well 6 days later or 2 days into the 4 day trip? The only metric I've seen is "per hour of pay" Also, I understand they don't like the amount of MIL leave guys are taking(personally know 2010 hires that have less than 200 hours as a Delta pilot). If they don't like this, why do they keep grabbing up the military guys that are still in the guard/reserve? Hey, the Company is free to hire whoever they want, if it's an actual issue they could fix it. Are they using the MIL leave added to the sick time(days not hours) to skew the productivity of the pilot group? I have not heard anything related to how much MIL leave is used. I don't have any "management connections"(can't speak for any of the others you mention), but I do know who to go to in DALPA to find accurate answers. |
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1879137)
I don't have any "management connections"(can't speak for any of the others you mention), but I do know who to go to in DALPA to find accurate answers.
|
Originally Posted by horrido27
(Post 1878937)
Carl, I will say that I (being a UAL Pilot) believe that you guys have a better PS program. I got 6.9% of my last years W2 based on 1.97bil in profits. Believe you guys got a lot more (even if we had made the same amount of profits).
Originally Posted by horrido27
(Post 1878937)
I also believe that your Sick program is better than ours.
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1725642)
Here's the list from our contract comparison as to who leads in the specified areas:
1. Scope...............Southwest 2. Pay Rates: -----B747/777.......Delta -----B767-4/A330..United -----B767-300.......UPS -----B757.............UPS -----B737-900.......Delta -----A320.............United -----MD88/717......Delta -----Per Diem........American 3. Work Rules: -----Monthly Guarantee...UPS -----Reserve Guarantee...UPS -----DPA/ADG................Southwest 4. Vacation: -----Accrual..............United -----Pay...................FedEx 5. Training Pay.........Alaska 6. Sick Leave............Hard to tell 7. Retirement Plans...FedEx 8. Medical................Southwest 9. Long Term Disab...UPS
Originally Posted by horrido27
(Post 1878937)
What needs to happen in this upswing is that the areas where you lead, you continue. Where you lag, you match or grow when compared to others.
Originally Posted by horrido27
(Post 1878937)
I've always said (to many deaf ears) that a Contract isn't about 'just' payrates. It's about everything.
At the end of the day, how much did you work for how much pay? On top of that, how much was added into your retirement fund? How much do you pay for benefits and how strong is your insurance? Lastly, what kind of incentive do you have to go above and beyond ie, PS, stock purchase, picking up extra flying.. etc? [All hypothetical questions..] Carl |
Originally Posted by pilotjockey
(Post 1879128)
thats pretty harsh, hes new and made a mistake so cut him some slack. it doesnt excuse his willingess to settle for less than what we are worth tho
|
Carl..
Just wondering what you don't like about your sick leave policy? I'll add that at UAL, we get 60hrs of sick leave a year. As you can imagine, building up a nest egg for that heart attack, busted leg or anything else that will happen as you get older.. is pretty tough. As far as PS is concerned, you're 100% right- how do you compare percentages between companies? I was always under the assumption that your PS was a result of management giving you something in return for your lost pensions. Again, your PS for this year blew us away! We ended up with less than a months pay, didn't you guys get close to 2 months? But again, what you guys have is definitely at the top of the pyramid and I hope you can keep it that way. Giving up any PS to fund any increases in payrates is a tough call. But there are two ways to look at it. One would be that by doing so, you guarantee your pay without having to worry about future profits~ The other is.. if the trend continues and Delta is actually forecast to continue to make record profits, then your PS check will be at record amounts! Tough call. As far as the last point you made is concerned- Yupe, JV and Scope are important. But at what price and for who? The problem has always been that certain groups don't want to give up anything to fix the problems that those in the past created. Do you secure lower raises for your WideBodies, in return.. bring more international flying inhouse and close the JV loophole? Do you lower 1st and 2nd year pay to capture more RJ flying? I don't have the answers to these questions, but I know that living in the real world means looking at what others are doing and as I said before- I don't think that the AA guys did anyone a favor with their contract. I just hope that you guys don't give up anything with regards to your PS, and that you can make gains in your payrates and workrules. Good Luck~ Motch |
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1878945)
The WS/GS analogy is bad, what if I skip the WS hoping for a GS and more trips end up in the pot!?!? Who's to say the Conpany will "up the offer" the longer we wait? How's that working for SWA, UPS, FDX?
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1878945)
A TA is not the "first offer" by any stretch, there have been EIGHT meetings of the MEC in 2015 (and additional Special Meetings in late 2014) for the Reps and the NC to direct, refine, and redirect the NC. They have and will say "NO" multiple times by the time it reaches the MEC for a TA vote. If the MEC decides to send it to us, then we as line pilots will have the opportunity to vet it again.
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1878945)
If it meets my personal requirements and provides an increase in contract value appropriately I will vote yes. If it doesn't stack up to what I think is reasonable and achievable, I'll vote No!
Carl |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:39 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands