Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 07-30-2016 | 04:48 AM
  #189861  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: 76-400A
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
12202 holy crap! Does the MadDog really suck that bad?
Yes, but you get to fly with the best Captain
Old 07-30-2016 | 04:50 AM
  #189862  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
12202 holy crap! Does the MadDog really suck that bad?
Yes.
I'm a junior FO on it. It was funny the other day...Had a senior m88 FO on the Jumpseat, and after a short taxi with a flurry of activity he said "Dang, do I really work that hard in that seat?!" I replied yes, you've just become somewhat numb to it.
Old 07-30-2016 | 05:42 AM
  #189863  
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,481
Likes: 478
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
The mad dog sucks. New York sucks. Put them together and your work life is miserable. Uncommutable trips, covering 3 airports on reserve, delayed flights trying to get to work. Who needs the stress? Let someone with a 12,000 plus employee number deal with it.
Someone who lives in the local area and is junior anyway. Flying the same crappy schedule, might as well make some extra cash.
Old 07-30-2016 | 06:26 AM
  #189864  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 282
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Flt ops has put out several times that the 747 block hours for summer of 17 are almost the same as this summer. As crews bid off they have to be replaced to meet the contractual minimums.
Got it. And I'm legitimately trying to understand this, not just throwin stones and wanting to argue, or complaining about being junior. I actually have had a great schedule this summer.

I understand we have some sort of contractual minimum and I understand that the company loses more money if the 747 doesn't go vs the M88. I'm just trying to figure out how the 747 is at contractual mins during the summer months when they have several days with 6 required and 30 available (which should only get better after the summer is over). While on the 320 in NYC, for example, they have a dozen days in August already where they have either zero or one reserve person available at all and not a single day with coverage. Where are the contractual mins for that and other fleets? I know we are hiring a lot for this last AE and that's great, but where was the hiring to cover the contractual requirements for the summer that has already passed, or the summer of 2015 or 2014? Shouldn't the contractual minimums for reserve cover all bases and all fleets? The answer I usually hear is "well they are junior bases." Ok..., so we can't manage that or have a requirement for that as well? And if the company isn't meeting the contract requirements for these "junior" fleets and bases; does ALPA lodge a complaint or do we just manage it with maxing out the reserves and having guys fly their 6th+ green slip for the month instead of actually hiring more people? Again I'm not trying to start an argument, just legitimately trying to figure out why we have a system where we get the contract honoured on one end ("meet the contractual minimums"), while on the other end they, and we, don't seem to care or back up the contractual obligations ("it's a junior fleet").
Old 07-30-2016 | 06:49 AM
  #189865  
Line Holder
Veteran: Air Force
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 51
Default

Originally Posted by HTBH
Got it. And I'm legitimately trying to understand this, not just throwin stones and wanting to argue, or complaining about being junior. I actually have had a great schedule this summer.

I understand we have some sort of contractual minimum and I understand that the company loses more money if the 747 doesn't go vs the M88. I'm just trying to figure out how the 747 is at contractual mins during the summer months when they have several days with 6 required and 30 available (which should only get better after the summer is over). While on the 320 in NYC, for example, they have a dozen days in August already where they have either zero or one reserve person available at all and not a single day with coverage. Where are the contractual mins for that and other fleets? I know we are hiring a lot for this last AE and that's great, but where was the hiring to cover the contractual requirements for the summer that has already passed, or the summer of 2015 or 2014? Shouldn't the contractual minimums for reserve cover all bases and all fleets? The answer I usually hear is "well they are junior bases." Ok..., so we can't manage that or have a requirement for that as well? And if the company isn't meeting the contract requirements for these "junior" fleets and bases; does ALPA lodge a complaint or do we just manage it with maxing out the reserves and having guys fly their 6th+ green slip for the month instead of actually hiring more people? Again I'm not trying to start an argument, just legitimately trying to figure out why we have a system where we get the contract honoured on one end ("meet the contractual minimums"), while on the other end they, and we, don't seem to care or back up the contractual obligations ("it's a junior fleet").
Yes ALPA cares. Delta is paying 717 FOs 5.something hours each for going below contractural mins this spring for a few days.
Old 07-30-2016 | 07:13 AM
  #189866  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 282
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by waldo135
Yes ALPA cares. Delta is paying 717 FOs 5.something hours each for going below contractural mins this spring for a few days.
Excellent. I remember quickly glancing over that a few months back but didn't delve into it too deep as a non-717 pilot. Again, I'm not trying to throw stones at anybody or ALPA, just trying to understand how and why we come up with a reserve manning formula that appears to be all over the place depending on what plane you are on.
Old 07-30-2016 | 07:25 AM
  #189867  
MikeF16's Avatar
Otto
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
From: Turkish Pile Driver
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
12202 holy crap! Does the MadDog really suck that bad?
It takes a certain kind of person. If you live locally the equation changes. But for the commuters NYC on a narrowbody is extremely challenging.

Hotels are expensive, even for NB captains. Crash pads are nasty. If you're 40-something you don't need snoring roommates, nasty dirty kitchens and couches, and people going in and out at all hours disturbing your sleep. Since you are junior, you will occasionally have 0600 EWR sign-ins from your Kew Gardens crash pad. Enjoy competing for the 1 shower at 0345 and the ridiculously expensive cab ride or mind numbingly painful mass transit to get to sign-in.

You are going to be junior for your 2 year seat lock, hope you don't like weekends off and vacation when your kids are out of school. Commuting to reserve is miserable at any airline or seat position. NYC adds congestion and WX to what would already suck if you were commuting to PHX. If you get a line it won't be commutable, see the previous paragraph for the fun that will entail. Since you will be flying into LGA quite often, just plan on missing your commute home every now and then since you are going to be late. 40 open seats on your backup the night prior somehow turns into 30 seats oversold in a matter or 12 hours. What just happened? Oh great another night in the pad.

Some guys bet on the come thinking that they'd be able to slide to ATL in a couple months. Nope, ATL is still plenty senior and you're going to eat 2 full years in NYC as a junior captain. Here's your encore kick in the junk. From your freshly minted captain's chair look to your right. That guy might be making more money than you while working less, with all the seniority he could ever desire. Such is the nature of NYC 88/717, I'll pass.

If I was 28 and single, sign me up. Hell, if I was 45 and single...
Old 07-30-2016 | 08:09 AM
  #189868  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,478
Likes: 481
Default

I'm still surprised of the 13.4k pilots that there aren't those local to NYC that can just drive in to all 3 airports with a 3 hr callout?

What makes the right seat of the MD88 more busy than say the right seat of a 717/737/320?
Old 07-30-2016 | 08:27 AM
  #189869  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
I'm still surprised of the 13.4k pilots that there aren't those local to NYC that can just drive in to all 3 airports with a 3 hr callout?

What makes the right seat of the MD88 more busy than say the right seat of a 717/737/320?
Are you asking seriously or more rhetorically?

I know the checklists are longer on the 88, there are more items that could "bite" you if you miss them on the checklist, and the a/c packs just don't cut it IMHO.
Old 07-30-2016 | 08:38 AM
  #189870  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
I'm still surprised of the 13.4k pilots that there aren't those local to NYC that can just drive in to all 3 airports with a 3 hr callout?

What makes the right seat of the MD88 more busy than say the right seat of a 717/737/320?


That comes from when the MD88 was used on shuttle operations and that's all you flew was shuttle. DCA, BOS and LGA use to turn that aircraft in 15 to 20 mintues. You would bounce back and forth all day 12 hours plus and get 5 hours of flight time. And yes it was the busiest seat in the company.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices