Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2017 | 08:38 AM
  #192551  
Imapilot2's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: Captain Jack
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
The pilots who got fired were not out of position one or two times.....or even ten times. One fired pilot was out of position over 80 times. That pilot was on the 747, so in other words he could have held a line on another airplane and not been commuting to reserve. No, he chose to abuse the system and sit at home getting paid, not even attempting to comply with the contractual requirements. In the meantime, when the company did need a short call pilot someone else had to go out and fly.

I don't feel sorry for anyone of the pilots who got fired.
Xray is spot on. These guys sat short call several states away from base and would just call in sick if they got called. They were gross abusers of the system and have put us all at risk of losing "promptly available" and screwing thier 14000 brothers and sisters.

I don't abuse but greatly appreciate the flexibility of our short call. Luckily by choice I can make it in an hour . I can get a call, be doing anything at my house , take a shower, get dressed and make it to work. If it went down to a solid hard time that would suck!
Old 06-17-2017 | 08:44 AM
  #192552  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: 6th place
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
Nonrev records, jumpseat records, KCM records. I'm sure the fired pilots were given a chance to prove they bought tickets or drove, but if you live in Florida (for example) and there is no evidence you got yourself to DTW, it's hard to argue you were in position for short call.


That's what I figured but it still seems like it would be hard to prove.
Old 06-17-2017 | 12:43 PM
  #192553  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
There was far more than one flight that caused the companies actions. If you get caught up in not being where you are supposed to be the company is going to ask where you were on previous short calls and verify that information.
To be clear, guys that acknowledge SC's knowing they can't possibly be there are punks who deserve a time out from being paid.

But since everyone deserves the most robust and aggressive defense possible, how exactly will anyone prove where you were or weren't in the past? If you rolled the dice and won on previous occasions, that closes the book on that anyway. You got lucky, end of story. Oh but our records show you flew to FL a day or three before and didn't fly back. Yeah well sometimes I drive (I love road trips) and sometimes I fly a small plane and sometimes I buy offline tickets and you don't have access to that information.

I'm all for holding guys accountable within reason when they actually get busted (but that approach should include graduated discipline and not cleared direct to UFIRD). But we shouldn't facilitate or tolerate blind fishing expeditions that try to retroactively prove guilt by inference. That's just ridiculous.
Old 06-17-2017 | 12:46 PM
  #192554  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
Nonrev records, jumpseat records, KCM records. I'm sure the fired pilots were given a chance to prove they bought tickets or drove, but if you live in Florida (for example) and there is no evidence you got yourself to DTW, it's hard to argue you were in position for short call.
So they have to "prove" they drove/flew/train/bussed? 80 times? Over all those years?

Please.

Hold them accountable for what they actually got busted for within fair reasonableness. Absolutely. But assumptions of guilt based on them not being able to "prove" something in the past is unreasonable.

Sorry but we gotta dig in and defend them against that BS.
Old 06-17-2017 | 12:56 PM
  #192555  
tomgoodman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 0
From: 767A (Ret)
Default

Originally Posted by mainlineAF
That's what I figured but it still seems like it would be hard to prove.
Yes, but if they ask whether you were in position, better tell the truth. You don't know what evidence they already have, and you might convert a wrist-slap for carelessness into a termination for lying.
Old 06-17-2017 | 03:13 PM
  #192556  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 0
From: Power top
Default

If you're on short call and playing the company, it's stealing. Disclaimer, I don't know the details of the terminations. When I did short call, I was available. That's reserve 101.
Old 06-17-2017 | 03:48 PM
  #192557  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
So they have to "prove" they drove/flew/train/bussed? 80 times? Over all those years?

Please.

Hold them accountable for what they actually got busted for within fair reasonableness. Absolutely. But assumptions of guilt based on them not being able to "prove" something in the past is unreasonable.

Sorry but we gotta dig in and defend them against that BS.


It depends on what kind of data the company has on them. I was assigned 7 Short calls last month - first time in 18 years that I maxed out on SCs. No wonder scheduling is going bonkers on assigning short calls. These guys are screwing it for all of us. It will be interesting to see what "proposed changes" to SC/reserve come up in the next section 6.

Suppose every time these guys have a trip they leave a easily verifiable digital trail - KCM, Jump seat, Non-rev etc - every time they have a trip and show up in base. Yet for years there is Zip, nada, squat for every SC. I will say innocent until proven guilty not the other way around but the fact is these guys were out of position when they were needed and apparently out of position for years.

How much bargaining capitol do you suppose the union should spend on guys that were cheating? It will be very easy to see if this was a one off or if these guys were gaming the system for years.

Oh and how many guys take the Bus and train across country to commute to work - I hope that you are not really serious here.

Scoop
Old 06-17-2017 | 05:43 PM
  #192558  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 54
From: 765A
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
So they have to "prove" they drove/flew/train/bussed? 80 times? Over all those years?

Please.

Hold them accountable for what they actually got busted for within fair reasonableness. Absolutely. But assumptions of guilt based on them not being able to "prove" something in the past is unreasonable.

Sorry but we gotta dig in and defend them against that BS.
BS?? I support any pilot who is trying to do the right thing, but ends of out of position, misses a trip, or whatever. But when guys blatantly ignore the rules, no I don't support them.

I have never understood pilots. If we were in any other occupation, and you had people around you not pulling their weight and constantly ignoring the rules, you would be ****ed. Why do you support people who are so far out of bounds it's inexcusable?

I'm tired of the company wanting changes to the contract because a few bad apples are ignoring the rules. Frankly, I think we are all better off without those pilots.
Old 06-18-2017 | 09:59 AM
  #192559  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
Default Jumpseat Question

I may need to jump-seat from Canada to the US in the future and have a few questions:

Can I sit upfront if the plane is full on Mainline, DCI, or offline?

Anything else that might prove useful would be appreciated.

Thanks Scoop
Old 06-18-2017 | 10:36 AM
  #192560  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 2
From: I got into this business so I wouldn't have to work.
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
BS?? I support any pilot who is trying to do the right thing, but ends of out of position, misses a trip, or whatever. But when guys blatantly ignore the rules, no I don't support them.

I have never understood pilots. If we were in any other occupation, and you had people around you not pulling their weight and constantly ignoring the rules, you would be ****ed. Why do you support people who are so far out of bounds it's inexcusable?

I'm tired of the company wanting changes to the contract because a few bad apples are ignoring the rules. Frankly, I think we are all better off without those pilots.
I tend to agree.
For every missed SC, some other pilot got stuck flying while these guys were flaunting it and collecting pay. IF all that we've heard about these fellows is true, I say goodbye and thanks for the line number bump.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices