Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
08-05-2020 | 01:55 PM
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
it’s in the last 5 minutes of the 8/4 town hall. They didn’t say they “plan on” using it, but that it is being considered
08-05-2020 | 02:01 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
08-05-2020 | 02:13 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 326
08-05-2020 | 02:22 PM
Line Holder
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 51
08-05-2020 | 02:30 PM
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
This guy is like an evil Robocop.
08-05-2020 | 03:02 PM
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
They do a better job unifying the pilot group than ALPA.
08-05-2020 | 03:05 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
If there isn't a very specific section of scope that's even subject to FM language, then who would even ask that question and why? Unless it was internally planted for FUD.
08-05-2020 | 03:13 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
Welcome to 2006 part deux.
08-05-2020 | 03:47 PM
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
What scope would be subject to that clause anyway? FM doesn't mean a self imposed unlimited internal Ch.11/1113c process whereby they rewrite the entire CBA as they wish. FM is specific so what applies to scope? Even the furlough pay would most likely be a slam dunk win for us, although its certainlly possible they might roll the dice just to "go for it" as it costs nothing to try.
If there isn't a very specific section of scope that's even subject to FM language, then who would even ask that question and why? Unless it was internally planted for FUD.
If there isn't a very specific section of scope that's even subject to FM language, then who would even ask that question and why? Unless it was internally planted for FUD.
08-05-2020 | 04:11 PM
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
What scope would be subject to that clause anyway? FM doesn't mean a self imposed unlimited internal Ch.11/1113c process whereby they rewrite the entire CBA as they wish. FM is specific so what applies to scope? Even the furlough pay would most likely be a slam dunk win for us, although its certainlly possible they might roll the dice just to "go for it" as it costs nothing to try.
If there isn't a very specific section of scope that's even subject to FM language, then who would even ask that question and why? Unless it was internally planted for FUD.
If there isn't a very specific section of scope that's even subject to FM language, then who would even ask that question and why? Unless it was internally planted for FUD.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
