Its going to be interesting to watch them legally justify a mandatory injection of chemicals into the bodies of pilots who never fly into the Yellow Fever danger zone.
Its a "Brave New World" when a corporation can do that.

Agreed. "Blue Fever" seems to be pretty rampant in ATL....

Nu

I have never seen a south guy post anything near as negative as you always do. You have nothing constructive to add...ever! Everything you post is right while everyone else underwhelms....see a trend here! You sir must be a JOY to fly with, I am sure CRM doesn't exist in your world....the all knowing CARL...

I will...as soon as you can tell me how to unstick my GAS PEDAL!!! :eek::eek::eek:

Carl

Like I said read what I wrote. Partially. I will agree that for some including you, the second part of what I wrote may have fallen on deaf ears due to the anger the lack of a further explanation. I left it simple. I think you should know by know, where I stand on this issue, and why. I hate having to reexplain the whole position on every post.

I know you are a budding union official, but I must tell you that lately your statements have included some typical political leanings. Example, saying that this thread is probably done because some internet character says management might be listening. Then others here (including me) slam this guy for attempting to squelch debate. Then I slam anyone who could have even been remotely affected by a concern that management could be listening. Then you post that the thread will live forever. This all in about 1 hours' time.[/quote]

First, budding, hardly. But who cares.

I agreed with Kingbird. He has a point. My statement about the longevity of this thread had to do with where it was going. Not so much by who was watching. It was getting downright nasty and that in effect will kill all of the good debate. We have moved beyond that. There are those that want thing thread to live, and by their desire, it will. We are in effect policing ourselves'.

Carl

As for the last part. To be successful in our desires we do not need to pigeonhole the company. Here is what the PWA states for the AF JV. This is why I am not getting my panties in a wad. It is precedent setting, and IMO what will be the outline for the JV with JAL.


4. The amount of flying subject to the AF JV flown by each partner will be determined from a summer season baseline period commencing in the summer season immediately preceding the full implementation date. All growth ASMs flown above the baseline figure by the partners will be aggregated and shared between the partners on a 50/50 basis, subject to Section 1 P. 5.

Nevermind:mad:

I see you found the Jan 30th Sked load. So what routes where these jets pealed off of?

You underwhelm me. :D

Carl

Nah, the guys over at airliners.net did it for me.

They're almost creepy in their efficiency....

Nu

I think while heated, the conversation is till in the realm of hypothetical.

I'll wait for the facts from the MEC. Have they found more mimeograph paper?