![]() |
Originally Posted by Cogf16
(Post 773506)
I dont need (but want) 5 weeks of vacation. I do need a pension. Scope is very important and i need it too. But I need vacation and a pension also. One's seniority often dictates what he/she thinks is the highest need. Obviously, a senior pilot is much more interested in pension issues than a junior pilot and that junior pilot is equally more interested in scope (specifically narrowbody domestic scope issues). Everyone must understand that wants and needs of a very age diverse pilot group differ greatly.
Apples and Orangutans. Scope is job security and career progression. Vacation and Pensions are employee benefits. We need both and it is NOT and either / or proposition. This failed thinking that so many have bought into is that scope = bargaining credits. It does not work that way. Time to let go of a decade of concessionary bargaining and move forward. |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 773554)
Are we talking about furloughing or hiring? Pulling a trigger sounds like a bad thing. Not that it matters anyway. In this economy, there are no jobs to be had anyway. I would just sit around on the beach all day "with a PBR in my hand."
Rumors are that recall letters sent out late this summer with hiring this fall depending on how many people accept recall. (150 is the number being tossed around that may Accept recall) *this is from multiple sources*
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 773559)
The pulling the trigger comment was meant for opening a Guam base. And we are much closer to hiring then we are furloughing. As a matter of fact, I think we will be hiring by the end of this year.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 773539)
If a junior pilot is concerned about scope he should be just as concerned or more concerned about work rules. The bulk of the job loss at Delta has come as a result of work rule changes that have the average pilot flying 25 percent more block hours then pre 2001. That combined with the loss of almost 1000 FE positions accounts for most of the lost jobs. We had just over 10000 pilots once. We got down to just under 7000 yet we were flying about the same number of pilot block hours system wide. The fastest way to more jobs is to fix the work rules.
Just make Vacation pay and credit and the company would have to post one of the largest Captains AE in history. Go back to a real monthly cap and your taking a AE of epic proportions. Your right, just like to add that without the monthly cap a lot of guys are trying to recoup some lost pay by flying more. We need to add the cap AND increase pay. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 773489)
Craziness. Glad we have not figured that one out. It is a waste of time to do that to us. Just give us the type and allow us to added it to our qualifications.
|
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 773546)
120ish total, already announced. Last AE care of about 75%. 150 more crews would staff the projected dc-9-50's way too low.
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 773486)
I would assume the sucking sound may be off West Coast bases if they pull the trigger.
(Ok, I just found the smilies. Bear with me.) |
Originally Posted by Cogf16
(Post 773506)
Everyone must understand that wants and needs of a very age diverse pilot group differ greatly.
One of the great things about this forum is that it helps to get to that understanding. |
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 773457)
What is this the news media? Could you add anything else to what I did not say?
My comment was "It is [your fault]. Control your own destiny". Nobody is holding a gun to your head regarding where you work. If you were someone who believed that you would only have to spend a few years at a regionals in order to land a coveted major airline job, I'm sorry that it didn't or hasn't worked out for you.
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 773457)
And don't be blaming anyone else if your career has stagnated. There are no promises in life and I'm tired of this "I'm entitled to it" or "I did my time" attitude. If you don't like your situation, change it. But please, stop blaiming others.
One thing I can agree with you is that we do have an entitlement generation and I'm tired of it too. I saw it while giving OE at my regional and I see it with kids nowadays. It's come from the instant gratification of technology and poor parenting.
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 773457)
It isn't that I'm not sympathetic to what some people in this industry go through, but some of us military guys didn't quite have our flying jobs handed to us nor a college education.
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 773457)
And the last time I checked, my military flying career hasn't exactly been a walk in the park.
The bottom line is that we need to hold scope where it is. Maybe we can actually take back some of the flying that's been given away over the years, although I'm not holding my breath! Generally, regional pilots are not happy to see the majors keep giving away flying. Yes, there's a certain percentage who are never going to leave a regional and want to stay where they're at. If we cave on scope again, we're going to lose lot of jobs at mainline. Personally, if I get furloughed, I won't go back to a regional. I'd get out of flying (controlling my own destiny) until Delta called me back. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 773539)
If a junior pilot is concerned about scope he should be just as concerned or more concerned about work rules. The bulk of the job loss at Delta has come as a result of work rule changes that have the average pilot flying 25 percent more block hours then pre 2001. That combined with the loss of almost 1000 FE positions accounts for most of the lost jobs. We had just over 10000 pilots once. We got down to just under 7000 yet we were flying about the same number of pilot block hours system wide. The fastest way to more jobs is to fix the work rules.
Just make Vacation pay and credit and the company would have to post one of the largest Captains AE in history. Go back to a real monthly cap and your taking a AE of epic proportions. |
Config;
A point of clarification. Do you mean retirement benefits, or pension? As in do you think that a fully funded pension controlled by the company is the way to go? If so I want you to convince me of that. I much prefer the money in my hands........ As slow has stated there are different pensions then the one we terminated, so I am just looking for what your definition of pension is. That way I can tailor my talking points! ;) |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:54 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands