![]() |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 527406)
Nu,
It's also kind of hard to make that argument when domestically the FA's don't even stay in the same hotels as the pilots. If that is the case and there is a reason for that, Old Delta guys chime in. :rolleyes: There has been some discussion of splitting the flight attendants off on some international layovers. This is because some hotels have indicated they do not want flight attendant business. There have been theft issues at some hotels. The Bombay and Kiev layovers are two locations where it has been a issue. Bombay is now a different hotel for obvious reasons. I had the hotel in Tel Aviv try and make me pay for missing room items from flight attendants on the previous flight. Told them to take it up with Delta they were not charging my credit card! |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 527412)
I haven't heard, does anyone know if Delta management has accepted the arbitrated list?
Denny |
BigGuns,
Thanks! I usually listen to them, must have been at a Xmas party or something........yeah that's the ticket!..............no mad cow here!! I hear memory is the second thing to go and I can't remember the first!!:D Denny......er......Crane!:D |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 526927)
BigFly, You should have received a letter from DALPA explaining the assessment in detail. If not go to the DALPA forum there are several explanations there. It has nothing to do with the reasons you posted above.
Read the two letters on the first page of DALPA and both give very vague reasons for the fund. Only that there "may be differnet interpretations of the awarded SLI" (seems clear to me) and that a joint MEC will not have the power to levy a fee on the combined pilot group. They cut short of specifically saying why they are levying the assessment but giving it the title of merger dispute fund kind of tells a story in itself. Are we paying our bills in arears or are we expecting more from disputing pilots legal costs? Speaking of costs, why did the merger committees have to go AIG on us and meet in a five star resort in LA. Those are our dues paying for such luxuriuos accomodations, meeting facilities, and I'm sure meals too. |
The assessment is not about the list as published. The different interpretations refer to the fences and some conditions. Its pretty easy to see where these issues could get confusing and one or both sides would dispute the others concept. For example. Delta parks the the 747's and annouces some draw backs on China service. At the same time they add a flight to Vietnam and Korea from MSP. They exercise delivery positions on 4 777's with 4 747's being parked. Who gets those aircraft? I have no real idea and I am sure it will take a 3rd party to make a ruling. The total assessment is expected to be about 165 dollars for the average captain spread over 4 months and 115 for the average copilot. The merger fund is depleted from the arbitration process. Its smart and prudent planning on the MEC part. Unused funds will be rebated back to you. Again on the DALPA forum there are very detailed explanations of why this is being done and why other funds can't legally be used in the case of disputes.
|
for those interested, the combined routemap is in the new sky magazine.
Delta-Sky Magazine: Full Magazine - November 2008 |
Originally Posted by NuGuy
(Post 527397)
Heyas,
Using the "me too" argument for giving up the call in honest policy is pointless. If the DAL FAs want their own commuter policy, they are free to negotiate with management to get it...but OOPS, they can't, because they don't have a union. Maybe that's one of the trade offs they can get to keep the union OFF the property...seems like DAL management can be pretty generous when it comes to representation vote time. I, for one, am not interested in curtailing our own negotiating priorities in deference to a group that's not even interested in representing themselves. If they feel that management best represents their needs, then so be it. Nu We don't defer to the FA's but rather the company will generally give them what we successfully bargain for. As you astutely mentioned, DAL management historically would do whatever was required to keep unions off the property. How this will change with NW's unionized labor force remains to be seen. Scoop |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 527482)
Delta flight attendants use the same hotels as the pilots....
Not that I care, but different work rules on any level allows the pilots to insist on trail-blazing work rules on all levels, if necessary. Someone has to take the lead you know. :rolleyes: As far as I'm concerned, Prater can talk the talk about taking it back all he want's, it should be us as New Delta pilots who implement it.... Ok, I'm back. New K Now!!! :cool: |
As I mentioned they generally use the same hotels. There are a couple of exceptions. We get a downtown hotel if the layover is over 12 hours. In some high cost areas the company will keep the flight attendants at the airport on layovers over 12 but under around 15 hours. The other is a area where one hotel can't cover all required rooms and Delta has more then one hotel under contract. Since the flight attendant rotations are built separate from ours they may be placed in another hotel. This does not happen often.
|
Originally Posted by rahc
(Post 527756)
for those interested, the combined routemap is in the new sky magazine.
Delta-Sky Magazine: Full Magazine - November 2008 |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:45 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands