Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2010 | 04:54 PM
  #44261  
NuGuy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,105
Likes: 100
Default

From the Council 20 update.... the interpretation of 1 B 40 e has remained intact, despite the interpretation of some.

If you don't find this huge, you haven't been paying attention.

Nu
Old 07-31-2010 | 05:18 PM
  #44262  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
80,

I gave you a perfect set up for cheerleader pics in an earlier post. Did you not take it because it was for older, NFL cheerleaders as opposed to the young, hot NCAA cheerleaders? Am I beginning to show my age?

Whoops! I was looking at it on my phone originally and with the small font I thought for some reason NuGuy (names look semi similar I suppose) posted twice... with the first post being much nicer and suggesting cheerleaders. Ah, post redeye delirium....

Should have known! I don't know how to post pictures on my new tamPad yet, so that will come shortly.

-5 newK bucks for me.
Old 07-31-2010 | 05:27 PM
  #44263  
UncleSam's Avatar
Everyday is a weekend!
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Seasonal Help
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy
Hey, if you non-rev and connect through say ATL, you can only view the standby list for the first flight. If you get on that first flight are you above all the standby people that are originating in ATL since your connecting or do you get thrown back into the list again?
Hey RockyBoy,

If you list for connecting flights, TravelNet now shows both flights in the same lightbox, but they are on different tabs. Maybe that is why you said that you can only view the first flight? It has recently changed and is not obvious at first.
Old 07-31-2010 | 05:36 PM
  #44264  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
Please do! As a south guy, I think that the DAL culture was superior to NWA's (in most of the touchy-feely ways)
That is probably true. I was referring to technology and the lack thereof at DAL. I wanted to say it, but I've beat that drum too many times and I think all it did was make some DAL south guys dig their heels in.

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
but aside from a perhaps unhealthy obsession with the rigidity of your SOPA/SMAC, I am getting the feeling that NWA's operational procedures were superior to most of DAL's.
Nothing rigid about it. Just Standardization. Standardized roles for each crewmember under normal and abnormal conditions. Everyone knew exactly what to expect from the other. If you didn't see it, you immediately knew something was wrong. Government regulators will force this upon DAL soon. Just too many NTSB probable causes out there that will drive high standardization to happen at DAL. NWA didn't invent it, but I do think we perfected it.

Carl
Old 07-31-2010 | 05:39 PM
  #44265  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
Strangely a very good description of how it was to fly under SOPA/SMAC. I'd love to see it return, but am not holding my breath
It will happen. Government regulators will force it. But by then, the move toward high standardization will be Delta's idea. And that makes all the difference.

Carl
Old 07-31-2010 | 05:46 PM
  #44266  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
It will happen. Government regulators will force it. But by then, the move toward high standardization will be Delta's idea. And that makes all the difference.

Carl

I think we'll see SOPA/SMAC return as well... probably a mix of the current philosophies while making standardization of flows and duties easier to learn, understand, and expect.
Old 07-31-2010 | 05:46 PM
  #44267  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Okay Carl, I'll take this on. I want to speak about AWABS because I have a question too.

Now follow me here, we're going on an adventure appropriate for friday night apcf and not to unlike I just went through with the movie Inception.

The other day I was holding short of ramp 2 on the north outer taxiway in ATL. Waiting for my gate because we were on time and our gate was occupied for another 20 minutes. Makes no sense does it? And we were on time despite having a reroute from BDL-ATL that took us over CLE.

But while sitting there I saw an MD88 come running down 26L for takeoff. I'm at the end of 26L and this sucker is getting closer, and closer, and closer, and not rotating. They had to be about 2000' from the end when they rotated and climbed out. Turns out it was a 9. Two planes later another 9 repeated the event.
I don't think it is an AWABS problem, as much as it is a desire by AWABS to use the minimum amount of takeoff power in order to use every inch of runway. I did that one time when we cut over to the DAL system. I've not done it again since. I use a power setting that is 1 or 2 below the maximum setting - and I go no lower. This gives me the additional safety factor that I want.

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
So that made me think of this:

Finger in Butt Crack Sparks Knife Fight
DALLAS - A Dallas woman touched her friend's buttocks, sparking an assault and attempted stabbing, police said.

According to a police report, 22-year-old Laquita Mattox rubbed a finger along the victim's butt crack, prompting her to clench her buttocks. The victim claimed the clenching caused the bed she was sitting on to break, angering Mattox. A fight ensued in which Mattox repeatedly hit the victim before grabbing a butcher knife and threatening to kill her. According to the report, she said, "Are you ready to die?" The alleged victim called police and the suspect fled, the report stated.

The reason why I thought this is I didn't know butt clenching could break a bed, but it about broke a pilot seat on an MD88. So, AWABS, like what is the takeoff run of a 9 on a 97F day in ATL?

Okay, some things have been embellished here, unfortunately not all of it. The news story is real.
I hate to even think about how big that butt must have been. A story that would make Jerry Springer smile, and want to know their phone numbers.

Carl
Old 07-31-2010 | 05:51 PM
  #44268  
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,203
Likes: 51
From: Legacy FO
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Just Standardization. Standardized roles for each crewmember under normal and abnormal conditions. Everyone knew exactly what to expect from the other. If you didn't see it, you immediately knew something was wrong. Carl
Could you please give some examples of what was standardized at NWA?

Thanks.
Old 07-31-2010 | 05:55 PM
  #44269  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Stratosphere
Gee from the looks of it I didn't think the MX group was missed at all.
Not true. We missed our real mechanics from the moment your strike began. I still miss you guys.

Originally Posted by Stratosphere
You FNWA guys certainly had the bottom of the barrel scabs doing your maintenance for you.
True.

Originally Posted by Stratosphere
Well as a former 20 yr ExNW mechanic and striker I knew we were not to be a part of the new Delta..You do know this merger was planned WELL in advance hence the plot to bust AMFA right?
Wrong. The plot to bust AMFA didn't have anything to do with a merger that happened many years later. Every single strike turns into a plan by management to break that striking union. Every single strike. The only union breaking plan that was ever successful at NWA was your union unfortunately.

Originally Posted by Stratosphere
It's a shame NW as well as having the best SOC used to have the best maintenance program in the business at one time..
True again. It may still happen.

Carl
Old 07-31-2010 | 06:02 PM
  #44270  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
My point about the rigidity of things (perhaps not SOPA/SMAC but other NWA guidance) was:

1. F/O's didn't even know how to load the FMS because that was the captain's strict domain. Ditto for overhead preflight panel, and the exterior walkaround. While I like the fact that usually a certain duty is delegated for this crewmember or that, to absolutely 100% of the time state "only" this guy does this or that, results in you losing a lot of knowledge, and more importantly, degrades airmanship.

2. Apparently at NWA you would rather go around than have the pilot flying actually touch the flap handle? While 99% of the time the flying pilot doesn't touch the flaps or gear, there are the rare occasions when the captain is busy on the radio or coordinating something with the FAs. In that case if I am slowing down I will move the flaps and just sort of indicate what I did. The captain always just kind of nods and continues what he was doing. As the FOM clearly states, we all know that is the exception and not the rule.

Correct me if I am wrong on any of this. Aside from a few things like this (if true) I still think that your way of doing operational business at NWA was stellar.
Every bit of this is wrong Herk. I don't mean to insult you on this, just stating the facts. I certainly wouldn't expect you to have an accurate handle on the operation of airline for which you were not employed. I sure couldn't.

Carl
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices