![]() |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 872211)
I don't think that's right. They distribute whatever qualifies, in proportion to your W2. IOW, the W2 is used to differentiate between employees, to determine what proportion of the pot everyone gets. But the size of the pot is a variable, and your part of the loot changes accordingly.
So let me get this straight, someone who got a ton of GS in the summer and is going to have a bigger W-2 is now going to get MORE money with the profit sharing as well? |
my numbers for profit sharing are based off of the Negotiators Notepad on the DALPA website.
Super quick version: DAL pilots make up about 1/3 of the "non-merit pool" employees (i.e. non-management). Therefore we get about $86.67 Million to divide among the pilots. If the "average" pilot makes about $140k (that is my number, its a total WAG). Multiply that by about 11000 active pilots. Take your "total pilot payroll" number and divide that by the 86.67 mil and you get about 5.5-6.5% range with room for error in estimates. That is how I arrived at my number. YMMV. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 872192)
OK, fine. The last paragraph is a good place to start. It's a far cry from stating "every other fNWA pilot a fNWA has flown with has taken a paycut" under the new contract.
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 872192)
The gist of this had to do with Alfa's assertion that Moak steered us well out of BK, and that he couldn't find an airline that handled itself as well. I don't think it was a dig at NW...
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 872192)
So let's step back a second... I think we can all stipulate both groups were unified...
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 872192)
As to the question of which group was more effective pre-merger but post-BK, and which contract was better, I read both T/A's, and it looked to me like the NW group made much larger concessions in everything but the pension...
Carl |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 872195)
What exactly in the workrules do you attribute this to?
Others have other reasons...but that one has kept my earnings down from the NWA days. Patiently waiting now for someone to call me a whiner! ;) Carl |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 872200)
You debating his numbers, or just calling him an idiot? Got better numbers? Put them up, so the rest of us can see who'se right. Thanks.
The reason his entire post is wrong is not just because of a 13% figure, it's because of the same mistake that some make here. That mistake is comparing the pay rates in effect when the NWA contract became moot, to the current pay rates of the new PWA. Some like slowplay even go so far as to say that NWA had no increases in their contract. It's not only wrong, it's about as wrong and misleading as you can possibly get. But as you said, you decide who's right. Carl |
Just to add...........I wrote it a page ago and took it down........but what the heck.
I MAY make less, (but I've never sat down and looked closely so it's just a feeling), due to the lack of time and a half over 80. Many months, like the last several, I would have made more since those months were over 80. Add to that, an extra day in Asia.......and ka ching. I never commuted to "high time" (NWA) and won't commute to a green slip for the same reason...........I'm sure it pi$$es of the commuter gods. But, like I said, I have a feeling I'm slightly worse off under this work rule alone. Anyone have a good idea what the difference between our old 4:15 day vs our current average day does? I've heard this one both ways too. Once again guys............things for 2012 openers, it does us no good beating each other up over it now. JMHO, Ferd |
Originally Posted by georgetg
(Post 872206)
FTB we need a cheerleader....STAT!
Cheers George Soft porn, you got it!!! http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviatio.../1/1560174.jpg you meant pics from the underground world of airline porn right? |
oh wait... sorry...
http://football-preview.com/wp-conte...heerleader.jpg WAR CAM EAGLE! Tomorrow night, 7pt ET, ESPN, Auburn at home vs Clemson. I hope Auburn wins. |
FWIW, coming from the peanut gallery:
Economy 2008-2009, bad. Merger, good. Pilots pay rates increase, good. Pilots not making as many hours as pre-merger, pre-bad economy, bad. Pilots making 218 hours of pay on 95 hours of flying, awesome. Changing work rules so all pilots fly above guarantee and making lots of money, good... UNLESS, in this soft economy it then creates over staffing and then furloughs. And those of us at the bottom go from being insiders to being outsiders. My vote, that'd be bad. But thats because my number one concern is a blonde hair blue eyed squeeze-a-muffin with not a care in the world watching Barney right now wanting me to kiss her bunny. You know there are some major and minor winners and losers in this whole merger, but I can think of some winners. The guys who once commuted and now don't. The long time DC9 LCA who lived in Brooklyn who now drives to work to fly a DC9 stretch. I know of a ATL 88 guy who has moved back to MSP I think to be back with his wifes family. I'll be back, after a certain 26 lb beats me l'oi |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 872249)
But thats because my number one concern is a blonde hair blue eyed squeeze-a-muffin with not a care in the world watching Barney right now wanting me to kiss her bunny.
Carl |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:45 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands