Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
The way I understand it there were some key players that were involved in all of them.
The AS agreement was modified to account for the NW AS agreement. IOW the Section 1 was in fact modified when DAL and NW merged...
I agree that most of these things are in place now with little room for remedies. That's why it is so important to understand and learn from the mistakes and the successes. Something that's not possible if one doesn't allow for criticism of sections that are lacking.
If we want to avoid past mistakes we need to acknowledge them, study them and ensure they don't happen again.
or
we just don't admit to mistakes and continue...
Cheers
George
The AS agreement was modified to account for the NW AS agreement. IOW the Section 1 was in fact modified when DAL and NW merged...
I agree that most of these things are in place now with little room for remedies. That's why it is so important to understand and learn from the mistakes and the successes. Something that's not possible if one doesn't allow for criticism of sections that are lacking.
If we want to avoid past mistakes we need to acknowledge them, study them and ensure they don't happen again.
or
we just don't admit to mistakes and continue...
Cheers
George
Now that we have time, I'd really like us to craft the contract the Delta pilots will work under, not to blindly head towards a TA. To me, the cornerstones would be be capturing as much of our flying as possible, a review of benefits, a redesign of Section 23, better DC rates, and, finally, tweaking payrates to get to the overall cost we can negotiate.
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Maybe the JAL MD-90's. I think the China Southern MD-90's are a done deal.
AirTran presentation:
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External...R5cGU9MQ==&t=1
Republic information:
Republic Airways plays it closer to the chest than usual | Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation - CAPA

http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External...R5cGU9MQ==&t=1
Republic information:
Republic Airways plays it closer to the chest than usual | Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation - CAPA

Look at the BH utilization and stage lenght. Those skew the numbers quite a bit. 433 miles for DL DC-9 vs 994 miles for YX Ejet? I think you need to look at similar stage lenghts and block hour to get an accurate comparision.
I mean really, I bet Delta flies the -9 a bit more than 6.7 hours per day.
Look at the BH utilization and stage lenght. Those skew the numbers quite a bit. 433 miles for DL DC-9 vs 994 miles for YX Ejet? I think you need to look at similar stage lenghts and block hour to get an accurate comparision.
I mean really, I bet Delta flies the -9 a bit more than 6.7 hours per day.
I mean really, I bet Delta flies the -9 a bit more than 6.7 hours per day.
So, not even actual numbers!
Also, I'm a little surprised that for Delta's DC-9, that maintenance and crew costs add up to $2,461 a block hour. The airplanes are depreciated and have no lease payments, so ownership cost should be almost zero.
Remember, there are Lies, Damned Lies and statistics.
In August 2009, a total of 109 MD-90 aircraft (all variants) were in airline service, including:
- Saudi Arabian Airlines (29)
- Delta Air Lines (28)
- Japan Airlines (16)[24] (Being sold during bankruptcy)
- China Southern (13)
- Uni Air (5)
- EVA Airways (6)
- Blue1 (5) (To be removed from service and leased to Delta)
- Hello Airlines (3) (To be removed from service and leased to Delta)
- Lion Air (5)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
I wouldn't say they are "mystical" MD-90s, we've recently taken delivery and operating 3, for a total of 19 on the line and there are 12 in storage under going maintenance/conversion. Ed said we'd acquire about 20 more. I'm sticking with at least 49 MD-90s in the fleet in the next 18 months, possibly more.
In storage:
ship number-type-date of manufacture
9220 - MD-90-30 - 07-Oct-97
9221 - MD-90-30 - 07-Oct-97
9222 - MD-90-30 - 14-Dec-97
9223 - MD-90-30 - 30-Mar-98
9224 - MD-90-30 - 30-Jun-98
9225 - MD-90-30 - 01-Oct-98
9226 - MD-90-30 - 13-Dec-98
9227 - MD-90-30 - 26-Mar-99
9228 - MD-90-30 - 31-Mar-99
9229 - MD-90-30 - 14-Nov-96
9230 - MD-90-30 - 31-Oct-96
9265 - MD-90-30 - 19-Sept-00
In storage:
ship number-type-date of manufacture
9220 - MD-90-30 - 07-Oct-97
9221 - MD-90-30 - 07-Oct-97
9222 - MD-90-30 - 14-Dec-97
9223 - MD-90-30 - 30-Mar-98
9224 - MD-90-30 - 30-Jun-98
9225 - MD-90-30 - 01-Oct-98
9226 - MD-90-30 - 13-Dec-98
9227 - MD-90-30 - 26-Mar-99
9228 - MD-90-30 - 31-Mar-99
9229 - MD-90-30 - 14-Nov-96
9230 - MD-90-30 - 31-Oct-96
9265 - MD-90-30 - 19-Sept-00
I'm not so much interested in aircraft we "will" see, as airplanes I can see. I'm not debating your info, only waiting for it to be proven. You can't blame me for waiting for confirmation: the gap between rumored and delivered MD-90's is significant.
I'm not discounting your info, let's just say I'm... deferring it.
Yep, did you read Note 2 on the YX numbers as well? It says, "YX E190 started operating in Q3 2009, stats represent internal forecasts".
So, not even actual numbers!
Also, I'm a little surprised that for Delta's DC-9, that maintenance and crew costs add up to $2,461 a block hour. The airplanes are depreciated and have no lease payments, so ownership cost should be almost zero.
Remember, there are Lies, Damned Lies and statistics.
So, not even actual numbers!
Also, I'm a little surprised that for Delta's DC-9, that maintenance and crew costs add up to $2,461 a block hour. The airplanes are depreciated and have no lease payments, so ownership cost should be almost zero.
Remember, there are Lies, Damned Lies and statistics.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




