|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 957833)
So is it wrong to want DCI to need A LOT more bodies than us? Thus, increasing their CASM just that much more vs if we needed a ton and they didn't then all the more reason to continue the scope smuggling operation?
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 957848)
I think Charlie Sheen is only legal in California. Where I live, we have a task force set up to bust Charlie Sheen labs. Unfortunatlely, some Charlie Sheen is still getting through. When I was at walmart the other day, there was this morbidly obese woman wearing camo with her bra exposed and her hair was really greasy. An obvious multi day Charlie Sheen bender.
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 957918)
FtB;
You can want that and over time it may work to our advantage. Problem is that all of these increased pilot costs will be pass though costs which will become DAL's burden, not the burden of the third party airline. Since it will be part of the required staffing model, DAL will pay for it. As as a result, that is more money out of DAL's pocket to third party airlines who have contracts and floors to their flying. |
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 958039)
I don't have a clue. Just trying to hold on to a little piece of the dream and LA. Lots of discussion about some significant base movement. Just hope its not THAT significant.
|
Originally Posted by NuGuy
(Post 958042)
Heyas,
The problem with DCI is that the costs there wouldnt just have to escalate past mainline costs, but go way beyond. Outsourcing today is like low fares at SWA, it's just assumed to be a given as a good deal unless some really sits down and takes a sharp pencil to it. There are a lot of intangibles that would br good if DAL took that flying in house. If RA announced tomorrow that they'd placed an order for 76-100 seaters, and would insource all that flying over a 5 year period, he would own the pilot group...especially the junior half, and would probably roll into section 6 with a lot of goodwill. Nu |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 958158)
LA will not shrink, LA will grow significantly via a gloriously transparent Alaska "air group" and friends code share bonanza.
If I had a nickel for every time I'm in our terminal at LAX and a passenger asks me for the T2 gate, I'd be a rich man. They thought they bought a "Delta" flight so they went to the "Delta" terminal...Too bad they're on Alaska Air to go to Mexico... Cheers George |
< ------ Is getting booted off his airplane because of that first graph. Trying to figure out where to go.
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 958067)
http://chart.finance.yahoo.com/t?s=C...300&height=180
http://chart.finance.yahoo.com/t?s=%...300&height=180 Where's NEWK when you need him? AND I SEE NIPPLE AND I DON'T LIKE IT |
|
Originally Posted by sinca3
(Post 958102)
I wouldn't read too much into it! The news section of DLnet always has those articles posted, and it rarely is when we purchase any aircraft and then only when it is a done deal. They don't usually hint and anything...
Originally Posted by capncrunch
(Post 958189)
|
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 958172)
< ------ Is getting booted off his airplane because of that first graph. Trying to figure out where to go.
http://boardingarea.com/blogs/things...0/12/dec23.jpg Because look at the calls you can drop: PM: coming up on a go for auto sequence start PF: go for auto sequence start PM: on board computer has primary control over the vehicles primary functions. PM: 20 seconds, 15 seconds, sound suppression water system activated PM: 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6- GO FOR MAIN ENGINE START PF: Main Engine Start PM: 3 engines up and ready... I mean 2 engines up and ready PM: 2, 1 Booster Ignition PF: We're rolling. PM: 80 knots PF: V1... Rotate 75 degrees up PM: Liftoff, pilot begins return to altitude. PM: Go for roll program. PF: Roger Roll PM: Nice Roll PM: throttle down to 72% of rated performance going into the bucket. PM: Entering area of maximum dynamic pressure. PM: Go at throttle up. PF: Copy go at throttle up. PM: Newk joined in the cockpit by [enter name] and on the forward deck [enter lead flight attendant] and on the bottom deck [enter remaining flight attendant names] I mean, so much of that won't be needed anymore New. It'll be so much easier. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:42 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands