Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2011 | 09:14 AM
  #63691  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Nice while it lasted
Default

Originally Posted by Eck4Life
Question for the PMNW hires in the '07-'08 timeframe. I've been carrying a -15 bank apparently that is just now being repaid out of my paychecks. I didn't notice it before as I was a reserve guy until recently and never broke min guarantee. Payroll says it was carried over from before the payroll dept switchover in Jan 2010. No one down in ATL knows what it's about, but I know I haven't messed with my bank. I would hardly even know how to. Is this a NWism that I've forgotten about? Something comes to mind about 15 hrs of pay as a new hire, but there was a lot going on then. Thanks for any light you can shed on this. PM me if you like.
Congrats on finally getting a line. Delta automatically grabs time over 80 hrs (min 5 hours if memory serves me right) to repay a negative bank. It stops at zero, i.e., they will not automatically take time to build a positive bank like NWA did.
Old 04-11-2011 | 09:14 AM
  #63692  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Eck4Life
Question for the PMNW hires in the '07-'08 timeframe. I've been carrying a -15 bank apparently that is just now being repaid out of my paychecks. I didn't notice it before as I was a reserve guy until recently and never broke min guarantee. Payroll says it was carried over from before the payroll dept switchover in Jan 2010. No one down in ATL knows what it's about, but I know I haven't messed with my bank. I would hardly even know how to. Is this a NWism that I've forgotten about? Something comes to mind about 15 hrs of pay as a new hire, but there was a lot going on then. Thanks for any light you can shed on this. PM me if you like.
Yeah, I'm in the same boat. From what I recall we went negative bank when they paid us 80 hrs during initial training. Since most of us sat on reserve quite a bit we never paid it off. That bank transferred to Delta and we carry it over. I think that's how it went. I'm finally going even bank now.
Old 04-11-2011 | 09:19 AM
  #63693  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

Originally Posted by Columbia
Air France to serve San Francisco with A380


Air France to serve San Francisco with A380 - Business Traveller

The French flag carrier will join Lufthansa as the second airline to operate A380 flights to San Francisco, with a daily service over the summer period.
The carrier will offer daily A380 flights between Paris CDG and the Californian city from June 6 until September 4, departing Paris at 1030 and arriving at 1240. The return leg leaves San Francisco at 1610, landing back into the French capital at 1135 the next day.
Business Traveller understands Air France may make this new superjumbo service possible by redeploying its A380 aircraft operating on the Paris CDG-Tokyo route, as a result of the fall in demand for flights to Japan following the country’s earthquake and tsunami.
Lufthansa is set to become the first carrier to fly the A380 to San Francisco next month, with a daily service (replacing the current B747-400 on the route) starting on May 10 – see online news January 27 for more information.
Originally Posted by Sink r8
That's actually an example of the JV working, without hurting us, for a change. We're not dropping a route for this to happen, we don't really have a competitive product to offer against LH's A380 anyway... so why not? Maybe it keeps people going for Skyteam miles, and maybe those people need to go to Japan using our flights at some other time.
I agree, and with the cutting of the AMM and CAI flights, we are going to have to get a bunch of other trans-atlantic flying to keep the ratios intact. Could mean the return of JFK/ATL to CDG flying to our guys, or maybe some more off-hub Europre flying like the PIT/BOS/PHL to CDG and BOS/MIA to LHR flying.

No matter what, I plan on hearing from DALPA soon on how that affects the Protocol Agreement WRT the JV and how Delta Pilots are going to be protected with these shifts.

Boy oh boy, the Scope Compliance Committee certainly has lots of things to investigate lately!!
Old 04-11-2011 | 09:19 AM
  #63694  
TheManager's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
That's actually an example of the JV working, without hurting us, for a change. We're not dropping a route for this to happen, we don't really have a competitive product to offer against LH's A380 anyway... so why not? Maybe it keeps people going for Skyteam miles, and maybe those people need to go to Japan using our flights at some other time.
Sink. A little premature on the analysis. Do we JV with them out of SLC? That is the key to answer, cause if we don't, there went a lot of CDG-SLC and connecting on to the Bay Area/Nor Cal market.

If we can no longer justify an ER out of SLC, then what?
Old 04-11-2011 | 09:20 AM
  #63695  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Default

VX A320 flying formation with Virgin Galactic White Knight 2 (including formation landing at SFO. Pretty cool....
Google Translate
Old 04-11-2011 | 09:21 AM
  #63696  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
Sink. A little premature on the analysis. Do we JV with them out of SLC? That is the key to answer, cause if we don't, there went a lot of CDG-SLC and connecting on to the Bay Area/Nor Cal market.

If we can no longer justify an ER out of SLC, then what?
Per the JV protocols that all the companies and the unions signed, an equivalent number of available "seat miles"(or seat kilometers for the European types) will have to be transferred to DAL metal for us to fly across the Atlantic.
Old 04-11-2011 | 09:29 AM
  #63697  
ExAF's Avatar
Get's Every Day Off
Veteran: Air Force
15 Years
100 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default Bank

Originally Posted by Eck4Life
Question for the PMNW hires in the '07-'08 timeframe. I've been carrying a -15 bank apparently that is just now being repaid out of my paychecks. I didn't notice it before as I was a reserve guy until recently and never broke min guarantee. Payroll says it was carried over from before the payroll dept switchover in Jan 2010. No one down in ATL knows what it's about, but I know I haven't messed with my bank. I would hardly even know how to. Is this a NWism that I've forgotten about? Something comes to mind about 15 hrs of pay as a new hire, but there was a lot going on then. Thanks for any light you can shed on this. PM me if you like.
It is not just limited to the "new hires." Unless you overflew 80 hrs a month a lot or actively worked towards paying off your bank, many had a -15 bank when we changed over. The info about Delta grabbing the "over 80" for bank payback is correct.
Old 04-11-2011 | 09:43 AM
  #63698  
Eck4Life's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ExAF
It is not just limited to the "new hires." Unless you overflew 80 hrs a month a lot or actively worked towards paying off your bank, many had a -15 bank when we changed over. The info about Delta grabbing the "over 80" for bank payback is correct.
Thanks for the insight. I guess my question is how it got there in the first place? The extra pay in training was mentioned, but I went through my old NW statements and they were still adding to it a year after I was hired until it hit the -15 limit. I can tell you with certainty that I never manipulated that bank on my own and that I never went cumulatively 15 hrs over min guarantee during that time. Man, I wish I had noticed it back then so I could ask the people that were actually well versed on the manner before the merger and so I wouldn't be paying it back at my higher payrate. There's a few hundred dollars the company gets out of me for free.
Old 04-11-2011 | 10:19 AM
  #63699  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
Per the JV protocols that all the companies and the unions signed, an equivalent number of available "seat miles"(or seat kilometers for the European types) will have to be transferred to DAL metal for us to fly across the Atlantic.
As you know the metric is ESK's or Equal seat Kilometers. It is very complex and does not just deal with passengers but cargo capability as well.

Not directed at you, but in general: It is a North Atlantic JV, not a Europe to the Eastern United States, so yes, this change effects it. I beleive it is being flown on the 777-300 right now. (At least that is what I saw last month sitting at the gate)
Old 04-11-2011 | 10:31 AM
  #63700  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
Sink. A little premature on the analysis. Do we JV with them out of SLC? That is the key to answer, cause if we don't, there went a lot of CDG-SLC and connecting on to the Bay Area/Nor Cal market.

If we can no longer justify an ER out of SLC, then what?
As I said, we don't offer anything competitive with LH's 380. If someone was going to Europe from SFO, and was given the choice of a single connection in FRA on a A380, and a double connection via SLC and CDG on a ER... I'm pretty sure LH would win.

Since I don't think we were anywhere close to launching a direct to AMS or CDG from SFO with lie-flats, and amenities equivalent to the 380, then this is a move that's exploring JV revenue on a city pair we're not toying with all that much.

I didn't say this is anything to do backflips over, but it is an example of the JV working as intended.

If we're distributing flying on the basis of ASM's, then I would imagine one A380 SFO-CDG needs at least two 7ER's from the East Coast to offset. And if this dings the SLC-CDG flight, which I don't really see (there are plenty of better options from SFO on Star), then we need further offset.

I can certainly review my analysis if warranted. At a glance, I'm not worried about this one. I'm more concerned we'll not see AMM or CAI back from JFK, for example.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices