Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Not so fast. Tsquare may be right that Pineapple Guy has a penchant for sarcasm, but he's putting extra words in his mouth. I don't think PG's post said anything about the number of ALPA supporters, and I'm not sure Tsquare is correct in his assertion that anyone (much less everyone) is forced to join ALPA.
All PG did with numbers in his post was to question Nerd's 50% articifial inflation in DPA support. That and he suggested only 2 people have stepped up to be reps, something I didn't see TSquare, Esquire, cover on cross-examination.
PG can be a bit arrogant with his numbers, of course, but T2 failed to connect on cross. The ruling is overturned by a higher court.
All PG did with numbers in his post was to question Nerd's 50% articifial inflation in DPA support. That and he suggested only 2 people have stepped up to be reps, something I didn't see TSquare, Esquire, cover on cross-examination.
PG can be a bit arrogant with his numbers, of course, but T2 failed to connect on cross. The ruling is overturned by a higher court.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,923
Yeah, I'm in the same boat. From what I recall we went negative bank when they paid us 80 hrs during initial training. Since most of us sat on reserve quite a bit we never paid it off. That bank transferred to Delta and we carry it over. I think that's how it went. I'm finally going even bank now.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Posts: 1,724
As I said, we don't offer anything competitive with LH's 380. If someone was going to Europe from SFO, and was given the choice of a single connection in FRA on a A380, and a double connection via SLC and CDG on a ER... I'm pretty sure LH would win.
Since I don't think we were anywhere close to launching a direct to AMS or CDG from SFO with lie-flats, and amenities equivalent to the 380, then this is a move that's exploring JV revenue on a city pair we're not toying with all that much.
I didn't say this is anything to do backflips over, but it is an example of the JV working as intended.
If we're distributing flying on the basis of ASM's, then I would imagine one A380 SFO-CDG needs at least two 7ER's from the East Coast to offset. And if this dings the SLC-CDG flight, which I don't really see (there are plenty of better options from SFO on Star), then we need further offset.
I can certainly review my analysis if warranted. At a glance, I'm not worried about this one. I'm more concerned we'll not see AMM or CAI back from JFK, for example.
Since I don't think we were anywhere close to launching a direct to AMS or CDG from SFO with lie-flats, and amenities equivalent to the 380, then this is a move that's exploring JV revenue on a city pair we're not toying with all that much.
I didn't say this is anything to do backflips over, but it is an example of the JV working as intended.
If we're distributing flying on the basis of ASM's, then I would imagine one A380 SFO-CDG needs at least two 7ER's from the East Coast to offset. And if this dings the SLC-CDG flight, which I don't really see (there are plenty of better options from SFO on Star), then we need further offset.
I can certainly review my analysis if warranted. At a glance, I'm not worried about this one. I'm more concerned we'll not see AMM or CAI back from JFK, for example.
I wish the rest of our Section 1 had the same high level of checks and balances.
More AF upgauging of the Transatlantic fleet equals more ER flying to Europe, it's that simple.
Cheers
George
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
The Most Dangerous Thing You'll Do All Day
Yikes!
We stand around a lot here at Men’s Health. In fact, a few of us don’t even have office chairs. Instead, we write, edit, and answer e-mails—a lot of e-mails—while standing in front of our computers. All day long. Why?
It all started last summer, when Assistant Editor Maria Masters came across a shocking study in the Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (one of dozens of research journals we comb each month as we put together the magazine). Scientists at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Louisiana analyzed the lifestyles of more than 17,000 men and women over about 13 years, and found that people who sit for most of the day are 54 percent more likely to die of heart attacks.
That’s right—I said 54 percent!
Masters immediately called the lead researcher at Pennington, a professor named Peter Katzmarzyk. Turns out, this wasn’t the first study to link sitting and heart disease. Similar research actually dates back to 1953, when British researchers found that (sitting) bus drivers were twice as likely to die of heart attacks as (standing) trolley operators.
Here’s the most surprising part: “We see it in people who smoke and people who don’t,” Katzmarzyk told Masters. “We see it in people who are regular exercisers and those who aren’t. Sitting is an independent risk factor.”
In other words, it doesn’t matter how much you exercise or how well you eat. If you sit most of the day, your risk of leaving this world clutching your chest—whether you’re a man or women—as much as doubles.
Yikes!
We stand around a lot here at Men’s Health. In fact, a few of us don’t even have office chairs. Instead, we write, edit, and answer e-mails—a lot of e-mails—while standing in front of our computers. All day long. Why?
It all started last summer, when Assistant Editor Maria Masters came across a shocking study in the Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (one of dozens of research journals we comb each month as we put together the magazine). Scientists at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Louisiana analyzed the lifestyles of more than 17,000 men and women over about 13 years, and found that people who sit for most of the day are 54 percent more likely to die of heart attacks.
That’s right—I said 54 percent!
Masters immediately called the lead researcher at Pennington, a professor named Peter Katzmarzyk. Turns out, this wasn’t the first study to link sitting and heart disease. Similar research actually dates back to 1953, when British researchers found that (sitting) bus drivers were twice as likely to die of heart attacks as (standing) trolley operators.
Here’s the most surprising part: “We see it in people who smoke and people who don’t,” Katzmarzyk told Masters. “We see it in people who are regular exercisers and those who aren’t. Sitting is an independent risk factor.”
In other words, it doesn’t matter how much you exercise or how well you eat. If you sit most of the day, your risk of leaving this world clutching your chest—whether you’re a man or women—as much as doubles.
Not so fast. Tsquare may be right that Pineapple Guy has a penchant for sarcasm, but he's putting extra words in his mouth. I don't think PG's post said anything about the number of ALPA supporters, and I'm not sure Tsquare is correct in his assertion that anyone (much less everyone) is forced to join ALPA.
All PG did with numbers in his post was to question Nerd's 50% articifial inflation in DPA support. That and he suggested only 2 people have stepped up to be reps, something I didn't see TSquare, Esquire, cover on cross-examination.
PG can be a bit arrogant with his numbers, of course, but T2 failed to connect on cross. The ruling is overturned by a higher court.
All PG did with numbers in his post was to question Nerd's 50% articifial inflation in DPA support. That and he suggested only 2 people have stepped up to be reps, something I didn't see TSquare, Esquire, cover on cross-examination.
PG can be a bit arrogant with his numbers, of course, but T2 failed to connect on cross. The ruling is overturned by a higher court.
As far as DPA support, it is at best a wag. I guess you could get a scientific polling group to get a better read, but I would also bet that that group would find that alpa support isn't as high as PG thinks it is either. What those numbers are can be argued ad nauseum in the forum environment, so I guess we can declare a mistrial.
In summation though, I don't think that DPA is a real threat to the ASSociation. They know that in Herndon. So they aren't paying it any more than a little lip service. When DPA goes away.. and I have said this before... alpa will go back to the same old same old... not that the national pig has changed it's ways.. but the local version will go back.... time will tell. I request a continuance.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Without objection... so ordered.
So just how is this Republic announcement going to affect us? I really haven't been following it.. I don't have enough RAM to process it all.. any of you geniuses have a Reader's Digest version of what it is all about.. and no Colonel Flagg.. I am not a communist.
Technically, you are correct, nobody is forced to join the ASSociation. But we are compelled to pay dues, at essentially the same rate as members, so while you win on a technicality, in practical matters, it is akin to federal taxes without a deduction for having a brain.
While it is true that you are going to pay the piper no matter what, there are ways of making your money more expensive.
Cancel dues checkoff, and make them bill you.
Nu
I have thought about that before, but didn't carry thru on that for some reason or other. I think it is the WAY that they would bill you... I really can't remember. I'm still waiting to see some real action.. and being that it is only April, and they just took office in March, they still have a little honeymoon period to enjoy. But like Nobama is learning, that honeymoon will go away someday soon.... hopefully our guys will be vastly more "successful" in doing what they said they will...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post