Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-2011 | 06:22 AM
  #69341  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: A-320/A
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
So do facts.

Carl
Originally Posted by slowplay
I note that you left out of your tidbits that when on reserve SWA stands 15 shortcalls of 15 hours per month, with a 2 hour callout window. I believe their guarantee is 78 hours, but I'll have to double check. Are you leaving out some of the detes?
For PMNW pilots, EVERY day on reserve was "short-call". Current reserve is MUCH better, but, let's face it, a bunch of guys still try to commute to a reserve schedule. Would a 79 hr guarantee on reserve be worth all days being short-call? Good question, but clearly, improvements are needed. 70 hr guarantee is too low. Anybody disagree?
Old 06-30-2011 | 06:32 AM
  #69342  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Delta will decide on plane order by year-end - Yahoo! Finance


NEW YORK (Reuters) - Delta Air Lines Inc will make a decision on buying planes by the end of the year, its chief executive said on Thursday.

"We'll make a fleet decision by the end of the year on mid-body replacement," CEO Richard Anderson said, adding that the decision would likely come before the U.S. Thanksgiving holiday in late November.

He cited some weakness in the U.S. economy but said Delta's forward bookings look strong.

"We're seeing some softening in the economy ... the indicators aren't what you would like them to be," Anderson told reporters after the company's annual shareholder meeting. He said Europe's economy was where he sees the most weakness.

Delta, the No. 2 air carrier behind United Continental Holdings (NYSE:UAL - News), said earlier this week it expects a "solidly profitable" second quarter as higher revenues have for the most part offset rising fuel costs.

The airline sent a request to several plane makers late last year for proposals to deliver up to 200 planes to replace aging models. Possible orders could include large, medium and small single-aisle planes to be used on U.S. routes, Delta said earlier this year.

The head of Brazilian plane maker Embraer's (Sao Paolo:EMBR3.SA - News) commercial aviation unit told Reuters last week at the Paris Air Show that he saw "good chances" of firm orders from Delta this year.
Old 06-30-2011 | 06:36 AM
  #69343  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: New to mother D
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
SWAPA does not actually like the result of being at the top of the pay scales. They would like nothing better then for other airlines to regain their historical advantage. Being at the top has led to stagnation and no growth for the first time in their history.
There are factors that have had much more influence on the stagnation at SWA than pilot pay.
Old 06-30-2011 | 06:37 AM
  #69344  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I've talked to ATL and DTW reps. They all have higher expectations than that. MSP was always the company ass-kissers at NWA. I would not worry too much about it.
Agree.

The ATL reps have been hearing what their pilots have been telling them. The contract survey is the most important piece to the whole thing. Pilots must convey they expectations in the survey for it to equate to a position at the table.

Most of the guys I fly with are looking for all sections to be fixed, and a sizable percentage above SWA as an absolute minimum. Even the pilots that are 57+ are saying this. I just flew with one who does not care if he sees the fruits of the contract, but he will not budge. Needless to say I applauded his point of view. (Yes, he knows scope and pay go hand in hand)
Old 06-30-2011 | 06:48 AM
  #69345  
vprMatrix's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
True, but we do not want to fly as much block as they do. If we could find a way to credit to the levels they have, then I am all for it. Many of there 20hr, 24 hr credit three days are going away.

Most of my buddies that are making 180K in the right seat at SWA are flying about 950 block hrs a year and crediting about 1400+. Compareably I flew 700 hrs last year and credited about 870. The trick is in the credit.

Mine is at about about 1.2 and theirs is about 1.47., or I had to fly .8 hrs to credit one our of credit and they had to fly .67 hrs to credit one hr of credit. That complied with pay is the difference.
I would point out that you are a RES pilot and while you have flown a lot for a RES I would but the avg ER pilot has a lower credit ratio than you. (I have no data to back that up though) My block to credit ratio is around 1.7 for the last 12 months right now so I should not complain.

I also think that the avg NB Delta pilot flies very close to the number of actual hours that a SWA pilot does. I would guess within 5-6 hours a month or 60-72 hours per year. There is little to no credit in the domestic trips so what you fly is what you get.

I have a feeling that most would fly an extra 5-6 hours per month with an avg extra day or two "OFF" in order to make much more money.

International is a different story and skews the numbers when trying to make a good comparison.

In any event. I wholeheartedly agree that we need more soft money in the next contract. Leg-by-leg cnx pay, and 6+ hrs minimum calendar day pay for all pilots, and 75 hr min guarantee are a must for the next contract.

In fact with a 6:15 min day I could let the leg-by-leg cnx pay thing go.
Old 06-30-2011 | 06:49 AM
  #69346  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Why is this math so challenging?

IF we don't get an interim agreement before 2013, and
IF AirTran pilots are brought to SWA pay parity in the next 18 months, and
IF you are only looking at the 10-15% of 777 pilots on reserve...

This is more typical Carl math. Only in Carl land, is $210 greater than $217.

Having said all that, I agree 100% that we should be making SWA rates on our comparable airplane and we should be indexed up from there for the bigger equipment. But if you think the donut boys, who are trying to ensure we will be having a representational vote right in the middle of Section 6 negotiations, are the avenue to success, there's nothing more I can say.
PG, welcome back from vacation and time to go revive that thread you wanted to play with before you left, but what Hoser mentioned below is what I'm getting at, the W2 will be greater at $210 x 78 then $217 x 70 and of course I'm not counting 401K just hourly pay for the most junior pilot of equal longevity.

Sure $217 and $210 is close, but this doesn't sound close to me:
A SWA pilot on reserve will make $14,000 more than a Delta 747 or 777 pilot on reserve even though one can only be called out on short notice to fly a 122-137 seat jet domestically while the other could be called out on short notice to fly a 390+ seat or 270+ seat jet to other side of the planet which may be to the west, to the east or over the north pole; who knows where but make sure you pack your bags because you'll probably be gone for 1 to 2 weeks.
Originally Posted by hoserpilot

Don't worry Carl, I got it. The W2 is what matters and Swa/Airtran, when combined, will be higher. Even a simple Canadian can figure that out. (-:
Old 06-30-2011 | 06:54 AM
  #69347  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by vprMatrix
I would point out that you are a RES pilot and while you have flown a lot for a RES I would but the avg ER pilot has a lower credit ratio than you. (I have no data to back that up though) My block to credit ratio is around 1.7 for the last 12 months right now so I should not complain.

I also think that the avg NB Delta pilot flies very close to the number of actual hours that a SWA pilot does. I would guess within 5-6 hours a month or 60-72 hours per year. There is little to no credit in the domestic trips so what you fly is what you get.

I have a feeling that most would fly an extra 5-6 hours per month with an avg extra day or two "OFF" in order to make much more money.

International is a different story and skews the numbers when trying to make a good comparison.

In any event. I wholeheartedly agree that we need more soft money in the next contract. Leg-by-leg cnx pay, and 6+ hrs minimum calendar day pay for all pilots, and 75 hr min guarantee are a must for the next contract.

In fact with a 6:15 min day I could let the leg-by-leg cnx pay think go.
Correct, but I used last years numbers because I flew over guarantee almost every month. If you really want to look at the numbers of a line pilot who is filling up every month, then look at the fact that most flying 88 hrs average a month with little to no credit. That proves the point further that soft time is more important. It will also be the hardest thing to get back besides scope. Less credit means more efficiency, and that is where they are aiming. If DAL had their way all of the trip and duty rigs would go bye bye, and we would get only hard time.

I agree, a better min day, not a duty period average or duty period min is needed. Many scoff at that, but these 10.30 hr three days that guys are flying 18 hrs in a month to get to the LCW are insane.
Old 06-30-2011 | 07:03 AM
  #69348  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I don't know a single rep working at Dalpa who believes we should be paid less then SWA in the next contract. When you make the comparison however the number that will count and be the number used by the NMB is total block hour costs not hourly pay rates. Pilots tend to have a focus on pay rates when there are so many other important area's in the contract that we need to make priorities.
I bet not a single pilot at this airline want's to make less than SWA but we're talking about an initial 25%-30+% raise to come up to parity if you believe a MD88 = SWA735/717.

So are reps pushing for a 25% to 30% plus raise at the outset?
Old 06-30-2011 | 07:09 AM
  #69349  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by chuck416
Would a 79 hr guarantee on reserve be worth all days being short-call? Good question, but clearly, improvements are needed. 70 hr guarantee is too low. Anybody disagree?
Modification from the floor:
  • 70 hour guarantee is fine
  • Every period of short call generates same 5:15 credit as pilots flying a trip
  • Allow pilots to bid for as much short call as they can stand
  • Status Quo w/ regard to max days on (no morons working 26 days a month)
  • Allow reserves to white slip
The concept of having short call pay credit over long call is important IMHO. Short call requires a pilot to commute and prevents them from doing something else. It is like being at work, but not being paid. Further, some short call assignments seem to be manipulated to keep reserves above 50 and below 70 hours a month. When tying to pick up over 70 they always assign a short call that takes you out contention.

I'm all for working and getting paid for it. Those who don't want to commute for reserve could use the long call to their advantage too.
Old 06-30-2011 | 07:15 AM
  #69350  
Superdad's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: 7ERB, no M88, no 7ER, no A320, NEXT!
Default

I recently flew with a MSP Captain who told me that he would go for a 12% pay increase, an additional 10% company contribution to 401k, and a significant reduction in health insurance premiums, all to add up to what he called a roughly 30% pay raise.

discuss...

p.s. this idea is being floated by some of the reps...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices