Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Ferd149 07-20-2011 12:44 PM

......................

BlueMoon 07-20-2011 12:54 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1025834)
Good concepts but two real problems. The first issue is how do you get management to agree. They own the seniority list not the union. They love divide and conquer as a cost savings measure.
The second issue is you say staple the regionals. The last time this got a serious look the airline involved (starts with a C and ends with a R) rejected a staple completely. They insisted on ALPA merger policy and made it know that their position would be DOH.

I don't claim to have the answers, but maybe you could threaten to sunset/not renew the CPA's with the companies that refuse to sign on.

They still get to make money on the aircraft and maintaining of the aircraft and get to shed those pesky employees

The regional unions might be tougher but maybe something along to same lines, though that might give grounds for a DFR suit.

I don't know, just throwing it out there on a day it is too hot to go outside.

Bucking Bar 07-20-2011 12:54 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1025834)
The second issue is you say staple the regionals. The last time this got a serious look the airline involved (starts with a C and ends with a R) rejected a staple completely. They insisted on ALPA merger policy and made it know that their position would be DOH.

You can keep writing it it & I'll keep reminding you, ALPA merger policy at the time was status quo. By paycheck, or equipment, it would have been a staple. The Comair MEC was procedurally correct in following policy which stipulated a commitment to a merger BEFORE SLI openers.

The history does show Comair never even made an SLI opener, nor did ASA.

You say you heard crew room hearsay. I heard it straight from my MEC Chairman. Further there is a paper record of everything that happened before, during and after the 2000 BOD meeting which fired the starter's pistol on the race to the bottom. Refer to one scrap of paper, any, even the back of a napkin, which documents a DOH demand. IT DOES NOT EXIST!

The only purpose of this DOH lie was to scare Delta pilots and justify the separation which enabled scope sales. The "Comair demanded DOH" myth is tired and debunked. You harm your credibility by repeating it.

But, you do raise a valid point if you were to re-state that the outcome today is much less certain than it was a decade ago. During the intervening years, our status quo positions have moved. The general move away from status quo benchmarks also makes the outcome less certain. After all, who had ever heard of pull & plug?

johnso29 07-20-2011 12:56 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1025834)
Good concepts but two real problems. The first issue is how do you get management to agree. They own the seniority list not the union. They love divide and conquer as a cost savings measure.
The second issue is you say staple the regionals. The last time this got a serious look the airline involved (starts with a C and ends with a R) rejected a staple completely. They insisted on ALPA merger policy and made it know that their position would be DOH.

You present management with the endless complaints against Delta Air Lines due to the complete lack of a competent, seamless product. This is the result of outsourcing.

Second, present them with the cost savings associated with less hiring & training since you bring the airplanes, pilots, & operating procedures right to Delta.

Third, regional pilots own their flying just as much as we do so it can be taken anytime & there is nothing they can do about it. Delta simply offers them a job and they come on over.

Check Essential 07-20-2011 12:56 PM


DALLAS (AP) -- In a case involving Continental Airlines, a federal appeals court says benefit administrators don't have the power to decide whether employees' divorces are real or fake.

Continental sued nine of its pilots, claiming that they got "sham" divorces so their ex-spouses could tap their lump-sum pensions while they still worked for the airline -- then remarried the same partners.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday upheld a lower-court ruling that employers can't consider or investigate why employees get divorced or whether the divorce is genuine. The appeals court dismissed Continental's 2009 lawsuit, which was filed in federal district court in Houston.
The Council 44 Chairman got booted for exactly this maneuver a few years ago. I heard he was suing Delta. I wonder if he ever got his money?

Check Essential 07-20-2011 01:09 PM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1025839)
You can keep saying it & I'll keep reminding you, ALPA merger policy at the time was status quo. By paycheck, or equipment, it would have been a staple. The Comair MEC was procedurally correct in following policy which stipulated a commitment to a merger BEFORE SLI openers.

The history does show Comair never even made an SLI opener, nor did ASA.

You say you heard crew room hearsay. I heard it straight from my MEC Chairman. Further there is a paper record of everything that happened before, during and after the 2000 BOD meeting which fired the starter's pistol on the race to the bottom.

The only purpose of this DOH lie was to scare Delta pilots and justify the separation which enabled scope sales. The "Comair demanded DOH" myth is tired and debunked. You harm your credibility by repeating it.

All true. But not the whole story.
The Comair guys were procedurally correct alright. They demanded the union declare a PID "Policy Initiation Date" which would have allowed them to take the Delta seniority list to arbitration. The Delta MEC rightfully told them right where to stick that idea. There was no way we were going to let that happen.
I understand your point Bar but don't blame that fiasco on the Delta pilots. The CMR/ASA guys way overplayed their hand. You can't deny that some of their lifers saw a chance to leapfrog and said so openly. They all might be on our seniority list right now if they had been reasonable.

Rather B Fishin 07-20-2011 01:11 PM


Originally Posted by alfaromeo (Post 1025827)
Read my original post, I said this is what the DPA's attorney has said, I did not say this was DPA's position. If you think that that there aren't any DPA members that want to change the seniority list and think DPA is the vehicle for that, then you are smoking crack. Come hang out in the DTW lounge for a few hours and you will see. DPA still can be all things to all people, because they have never had to stick to anything they have written or said, they can just change it at a whim.

Note again, I never said this was DPA's official position, I have seen the blurb on the website. My point was and remains, the DPA attorney has said that negotiating changed seniority lists was like negotiating crew meals and the DOH is the gold standard. I have provided proof of both of those statements. This is not an opinion, it is cold hard fact.

The DPA spin machine is out in force today, I think I hit a nerve.


ALPA is riddled with faults but the DPA is "beyond reproach" for some individuals on here. I totally agree with your above post. Some of the more ardant DPA supporters I have come across also complain how badly they took it in the shorts in regards to the SLI.

Bucking Bar 07-20-2011 01:12 PM

AMR stock did nearly nothing after the "biggest airplane order in history."

AMR Corporation: NYSE:AMR quotes & news - Google Finance

Wonder what effect that has on our Board of Directors?

Bucking Bar 07-20-2011 01:18 PM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1025846)
All true. But not the whole story.
The Comair guys were procedurally correct alright. They demanded the union declare a PID "Policy Initiation Date" which would have allowed them to take the Delta seniority list to arbitration. The Delta MEC rightfully told them right where to stick that idea. There was no way we were going to let that happen.
I understand your point Bar but don't blame that fiasco on the Delta pilots. The CMR/ASA guys way overplayed their hand. You can't deny that some of their lifers saw a chance to leapfrog and said so openly. They all might be on our seniority list right now if they had been reasonable.

All true, but there was a sequential procedure to follow and the inexperienced MEC's followed it just like a checklist.

I have the unpublished "supposal" archived and it was a ASA and Comair merger by DOH with the result stapled below the last Delta pilot. Bidding protections from a flush might have been objectionable, but remember, this was an early edit of a proposal. (Interesting historical fact, I changed the names and re-posted the proposal as a format for a Delta / NWA merger and pilots from both sides liked the idea, if anyone remembers that thread)

There might have been other reasons the merger was a no go, but a Comair DOH demand was not one of them. Mostly the Delta pilots saw no benefit to capturing RJ flying ... and that probably has not changed.

Hope I don't "overplay my hand" when the Captain calls for the Before Takeoff Check and I comply. (just kidding)

acl65pilot 07-20-2011 01:25 PM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1025852)
AMR stock did nearly nothing after the "biggest airplane order in history."

AMR Corporation: NYSE:AMR quotes & news - Google Finance

Wonder what effect that has on our Board of Directors?

Probably not much. AC orders are about keeping the product and the reliability there, not about getting a bump in stock prices. 2017 is a long way off, and investors know that in our industry that is at least once cycle away. :rolleyes:


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:41 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands