Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

forgot to bid 07-24-2011 06:59 PM


Originally Posted by alfaromeo (Post 1027981)
That fact has not stopped USAPA from committing mass career suicide as they embark on their fools errand. The DPA lawyer has assisted in that career suicide and collected a s..t load of money doing it.

How much and how does that compare to what we pay Cohen, Weiss and Simon LLP?

It's not a loaded question btw, just curious.


Originally Posted by alfaromeo (Post 1027981)
My point was always and remains this: DPA is an amorphous blob that shapes itself to whatever anyone wants to see in it. SOME (SOME,SOME,SOME, please someone look up that definition in the dictionary) pilots think DPA will change the seniority list.

Are we to infer that a ambiguous definition of amount is tantamount in your argument to a small insignificant fraction of the overall population? < using dictionary lingo.

Thus the amount of people who want an SLI change is insignificant and no longer needs to be discussed here?

I concur.


Originally Posted by alfaromeo (Post 1027981)
SOME think they will make a money tree grow and we can just pick off however much we want. SOME think that they can rid the world of RJ's.

A whole lot of people are noticing SWA pay and scope which is soon to be AirTran's new pay and scope. AirTran as the airline many laughed at here in ATL.


Originally Posted by alfaromeo (Post 1027981)
My point never was about changing the seniority list, it was about how DPA merely changes their website to fit whatever situation they find themselves in.

DPA blows through every timeline they ever set and they get a free pass.

True. But this is not a small number.

http://www.delta-pilots.org/storage/...=1304632779668

Don't forget, DALPA has plenty of time to address what is seemingly the biggest 3 issues: transparency, scope and pay.


Originally Posted by alfaromeo (Post 1027981)
They also engage in deception in all their communications.

Yikes. The nature of any organizations PR is such not everything is true, but all of it untrue?

But they're an amorphous blob? Thus, free to say whatever they want because whatever they want is what they want, which makes it inherently true to say you want it. Whether you can achieve it is one thing, but you're not lying to say you want it.


Originally Posted by alfaromeo (Post 1027981)
ALPA gets blamed for everything under the sun including rickets and the Friday, Friday song. That is my point. If DPA ever becomes our bargaining agent, then they will have to actually perform something. At that point, all of these people who can transform their hopes and beliefs into this amorphous blob will get a massive wakeup call. That is my point. No matter what Carl says, this was not about seniority lists, this was about how easy it is to achieve your goals when you can merely erase them from the website and replace them with new ones. Actually doing something is much harder. I can create a website that says I hit .415 with 87 homers in major league baseball last year, that doesn't make me the starting center fielder on the Reds.

Here's the thing about ALPA vs DPA that most of us struggle with outside of being the reason for rickets:

http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...g?t=1311594703

Now how are we supposed to get SWA scope and pay working through an organization whose members and hopeful new members are the ones being whipsawed against us and would be negatively effected by any scope gains by us?


-----

BTW, f DALPA ever wants to talk about divesting itself out of ALPA in some way, I'd love it!

And being able to elect our MEC Chairman by a pilot vote would be icing on the cake!

Any interest in that because man, I think the whole DPA thing would fade away with both of those.

forgot to bid 07-24-2011 07:04 PM


Originally Posted by Nosmo King (Post 1027989)
The same place you can find a detailed breakdown of DALPA flight pay loss.

Please note the D in front of the ALPA this time.

http://gallery.mailchimp.com/47caf69...Eastwood.1.jpg

Brocc15 07-24-2011 09:18 PM

Can someone please PM me the name of our ALPA jumpseat guy, and email address? Thanks. Was denied jumpseat by gate (not crew) for international flight on continental, but our emails from ALPA said that we are allowed that now. Everyone from the Captain to gate agents to operations to dispatch got involved and the final word was no, I can't occupy the jumpseat! Does anyone have any info on why this would be? A deadheading pilot for continental was very nice and took the JS so I could get on, but if it weren't for him I would have been stranded in a foreign country. Ugh.

sinca3 07-24-2011 09:25 PM


Originally Posted by Brocc15 (Post 1028048)
Can someone please PM me the name of our ALPA jumpseat guy, and email address? Thanks. Was denied jumpseat by gate (not crew) for international flight on continental, but our emails from ALPA said that we are allowed that now. Everyone from the Captain to gate agents to operations to dispatch got involved and the final word was no, I can't occupy the jumpseat! Does anyone have any info on why this would be? A deadheading pilot for continental was very nice and took the JS so I could get on, but if it weren't for him I would have been stranded in a foreign country. Ugh.

I didn't think anyone from another carrier could jumpseat international except for on their own airline. As an example a Continental pilot couldn't JS on us between Paris and JFK

threeighteen 07-24-2011 09:46 PM


Originally Posted by sinca3 (Post 1028049)
I didn't think anyone from another carrier could jumpseat international except for on their own airline. As an example a Continental pilot couldn't JS on us between Paris and JFK

Correct. Cabin-seat only.

Jack Bauer 07-24-2011 10:24 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1027998)
How much and how does that compare to what we pay Cohen, Weiss and Simon LLP?

It's not a loaded question btw, just curious.



Are we to infer that a ambiguous definition of amount is tantamount in your argument to a small insignificant fraction of the overall population? < using dictionary lingo.

Thus the amount of people who want an SLI change is insignificant and no longer needs to be discussed here?

I concur.



A whole lot of people are noticing SWA pay and scope which is soon to be AirTran's new pay and scope. AirTran as the airline many laughed at here in ATL.



True. But this is not a small number.

http://www.delta-pilots.org/storage/...=1304632779668

Don't forget, DALPA has plenty of time to address what is seemingly the biggest 3 issues: transparency, scope and pay.



Yikes. The nature of an organization is such not everything is true, but all?

But they're an amorphous blob? Thus, free to say whatever they want because whatever they want is inherently true.



Here's the thing about ALPA vs DPA that most of us struggle with:

http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...g?t=1311562737

Now how are we supposed to get SWA scope and pay working through an organization where it's members and hopeful new members are the ones being whipsawed against us?


-----

BTW, f DALPA ever wants to talk about divesting itself out of ALPA in some way, I'd love it!

And being able to elect our MEC Chairman by a pilot vote would be icing on the cake!

Any interest in that because man, I think the whole DPA thing would fade away with both of those.

That hierarchy picture is worth at least a thousand words. Meanwhile....on a board not so far away a rebuttal to the same arguments being levied against DPA here....

"I can say as a former TWA Pilot, after I heard 3 1/2 hours of closing arguments from ALPA's attorney (in the recent lawsuit TWA vs ALPA) on how they provided support for the former TWA Pilots, DPA is worth the effort. The jury, Judge and everyone in the courtroom struggled to stay awake as ALPA's Attorney hopelessly rambled on trying to put together some series of events that showed their support for TWA Pilots, and as you may know, the jury was unconvinced ( as was I and anybody with half a brain would be sitting in that courtroom) and brought back a unanimous decision in favor of the TWA Pilots. I hope Delta Pilots are successful in getting out from under ALPA. ALPA does what's best for ALPA, if your needs are deemed valid by ALPA then you'll get great support.........if not....be careful and get all correspondence in writing."

- 71Driver- F.I.

iaflyer 07-24-2011 11:25 PM


Originally Posted by sinca3 (Post 1028049)
I didn't think anyone from another carrier could jumpseat international except for on their own airline. As an example a Continental pilot couldn't JS on us between Paris and JFK

No, it changed recently from what I remember. Ah, found it.

from the April 15, 2011 ALPA FastREAD.

ALPA Secures Flight Deck Jumpseat Enhancements ALPA is pleased to announce that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has adopted two significant policy changes regarding the cockpit jumpseat that the Association has advocated to the agency for several years. The TSA has now lifted restrictions that have kept pilots from occupying the jumpseat due to security-related decisions made immediately after the attacks of 9/11. Since those attacks, numerous new layers of security have made the restrictions unnecessary.
Under the new policy, airline pilots who are aboard the aircraft in a capacity other than as an operating crewmember will be able to ride in the cockpit of U.S. aircraft operators on domestic or international flights with the concurrence of the pilot-in-command after their identity and employment status have been verified. The jumpseat will be made available at captain’s discretion, regardless of the aircraft’s passenger load or the flight’s point of origin.
“Since the attacks of 9/11, flight deck access restrictions have limited the ability of airline pilots traveling as passengers to assist the operating crew,” said ALPA president Capt. Lee Moak. “ALPA-recommended procedures have now been adopted by the TSA to provide cockpit access to airline pilots traveling as passengers. Ultimately, the more frequent presence of additional crewmembers on the flight deck will increase the overall safety and security of flight.”
In addition to numerous meetings with the TSA on the subject, a November 2009 ALPA white paper entitled “The Air Line Pilots Association, International Position on TSA-Issued Flight Deck Jumpseat Access Regulations and Protocols” was used to advance the Association’s views.
If you have any questions about this announcement, please contact the Engineering & Air Safety Department at 800-424-2470.

threeighteen 07-25-2011 12:19 AM


Originally Posted by iaflyer (Post 1028062)
No, it changed recently from what I remember. Ah, found it.

from the April 15, 2011 ALPA FastREAD.

ALPA Secures Flight Deck Jumpseat Enhancements ALPA is pleased to announce that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has adopted two significant policy changes regarding the cockpit jumpseat that the Association has advocated to the agency for several years. The TSA has now lifted restrictions that have kept pilots from occupying the jumpseat due to security-related decisions made immediately after the attacks of 9/11. Since those attacks, numerous new layers of security have made the restrictions unnecessary.
Under the new policy, airline pilots who are aboard the aircraft in a capacity other than as an operating crewmember will be able to ride in the cockpit of U.S. aircraft operators on domestic or international flights with the concurrence of the pilot-in-command after their identity and employment status have been verified. The jumpseat will be made available at captain’s discretion, regardless of the aircraft’s passenger load or the flight’s point of origin.
“Since the attacks of 9/11, flight deck access restrictions have limited the ability of airline pilots traveling as passengers to assist the operating crew,” said ALPA president Capt. Lee Moak. “ALPA-recommended procedures have now been adopted by the TSA to provide cockpit access to airline pilots traveling as passengers. Ultimately, the more frequent presence of additional crewmembers on the flight deck will increase the overall safety and security of flight.”
In addition to numerous meetings with the TSA on the subject, a November 2009 ALPA white paper entitled “The Air Line Pilots Association, International Position on TSA-Issued Flight Deck Jumpseat Access Regulations and Protocols” was used to advance the Association’s views.
If you have any questions about this announcement, please contact the Engineering & Air Safety Department at 800-424-2470.

So now it's a matter of getting Airlines to adopt it....

BigGuns 07-25-2011 01:33 AM


Originally Posted by threeighteen (Post 1028065)
So now it's a matter of getting Airlines to adopt it....

Yes.... Our FOM still says that OAL JS riders must still sit in back if if seat is available. Also our FOM says only an DAL pilot or DAL FA can sit in a cabin JS but the FA red red book and gate computer say compass fa can sit in cabin JS.

acl65pilot 07-25-2011 03:32 AM


Originally Posted by cni187 (Post 1027996)
There I was starting short call at 0530 this morning asleep in my bed.

Phone rings at 1020, I look and its scheduling.

"Hello!" I say.

Scheduler says "Yeah we got you on rotation **** signing in at 10:10"

"Well its 10:20!" I say

"Yeah so were are you?" - Scheduler

"Umm no one called me this morning" - Me

"Yeah it says here it was placed on your line at 0500 and acknowledged."

"Hmm that's weird because I was asleep and there's no incoming calls at all today"

"So when can you show up?"

Gotta love it!

They have been doing that a lot lately. Their lack of anger seems to indicate to me that they knew what they were up to. A scheduler can AKC for you, and because of that, they could have sworn they called you.

I always check my sked right when I start SC, and then one minute later so I can get a screen shot with the time stamp on it. I also take a screen shot of the coverage list.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:48 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands