![]() |
Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
(Post 1032055)
DO YOU EVER READ ANYTHING?
I said they are NOT equals, imo. I ALSO said the current proposed SLI is far from my version of a fair integration, imo. Please don't try to equate the two. |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1032057)
ALFA;
Airtran was ALPA when this merger was announced, not independant. I do not expect ALPA to be the fairy godmother, but I do expect alpa to be more than the castrated gimp. I do not see the point of ALPA anymore. No goals, no teeth, legal deck is stacked against it, I dont get the point of ALPA. |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1032057)
I do not see the point of ALPA anymore. No goals, no teeth, legal deck is stacked against it, I dont get the point of ALPA.
If ALPA would find its way back to its foundational beliefs, it could once again become great. ALPA's own poor legal strategy has harmed it much more than having the "deck stacked against it." You see, a union has an uphill battle when it demands the Courts or Management recognize job protection provisions that the union itself undermines. Independent unions, by virtue of their independence, will never have the unity to get the big things done. If given the choice between hope and impossible. I'll pick hope. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1032048)
This is a very interesting post. Everything in red highlights what ALPA national does or does not do.. what they can or cannot do. Basically, you then indemnify the national group with the 2 items highlighted in blue "The ATI pilots are the ones that have to decide" So what you say is confusing here. ALPA does nothing other than to recommend. The individual pilots have to make the decision. So tell me again what real purpose the national association has? It is not a flamebait question, but rather a serious one. And then there is the last thing I highlighted in green. You say that ALPA has a responsibility... what are the ramifications of that "responsibility" if they fail to deliver? I'll answer it for you.. nothing because they are simply recommendations based on their judgements.. and they have no real fallout if they bugger it up. Nice gig if you can get it, and get paid to boot.
If it came down to AT pilots not accepting their TA, and decide to go to "self help", would ALPA spend MCF to defend a pilot group who will eventually go to SWAPA ? ALPA didn't do that for TWA pilots i don't think they would do that for AT pilots either. |
Originally Posted by nerd2009
(Post 1032074)
If it came down to AT pilots not accepting their TA, and decide to go to "self help", would ALPA spend MCF to defend a pilot group who will eventually go to SWAPA ?
ALPA didn't do that for TWA pilots i don't think they would do that for AT pilots either. |
Three Airlines Look “Oversold and Ripe to Buy”: Dahlman Rose - Stocks To Watch Today - Barrons.com
AUGUST 1, 2011, 9:47 AM ET Three Airlines Look “Oversold and Ripe to Buy”: Dahlman Rose By Avi Salzman Dahlman Rose analyst Helane Becker upgraded three airlines this morning after stocks in the industry fell 16% last month and 8% just last week. Becker raised Delta (DAL), United Continental (UAL) and Alaska Airlines (ALK) to Buy from Hold, and also boosted JetBlue (JBLU) to Hold from Sell, as capacity cuts in the industry should help improve profitability at the airlines going forward. “We believe the airlines may exceed scaled-down expectations in 2H11 given the planned capacity cuts,” Becker writes. Delta and United should also be able to shore up their balance sheets in the next couple of years. “Delta Air Lines and United Continental stated they plan to use free cash flow over the next two years to pay down debt. Both companies target $10 billion in net debt. We believe both are likely to achieve this by 2013, although Delta has been more aggressive in marketing this as a goal. As Delta and United pay down debt, interest expense will decline improving the bottom line.” But AMR (AMR), the parent of American Airlines, could see more troubles ahead, and Becker dropped her price target to $3.75 from $4.50. Delta rose 2.7% in early trading. United was up 1.1%, Alaska Airlines rose 1.4% and JetBlue was up 1.5%. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1032063)
watch this unfold from the Uecker seats
|
Originally Posted by Carl Spakler
(Post 1032092)
"Uecker seats" are those the ones you sit at when your feet are on the Chief Pilot's desk?
|
Originally Posted by nerd2009
(Post 1032074)
If it came down to AT pilots not accepting their TA, and decide to go to "self help", would ALPA spend MCF to defend a pilot group who will eventually go to SWAPA ?
ALPA didn't do that for TWA pilots i don't think they would do that for AT pilots either. I'm no expert, but I believe the TWA lawsuit was buyer's remorse after the MEC did exactly what they chose to do, then didn't like the result; and wanted MCF money to fight against the very thing they had already agreed to. Pretty much just like USAPA is doing now. |
Originally Posted by nerd2009
(Post 1032074)
If it came down to AT pilots not accepting their TA, and decide to go to "self help", would ALPA spend MCF to defend a pilot group who will eventually go to SWAPA ?
ALPA didn't do that for TWA pilots i don't think they would do that for AT pilots either. The TWA pilots had a member ratification of their SLI deal with AMR. Once they voted it in their was nothing for ALPA to do. TWA was also within 60 days of liquidation with cash almost depleted. The situation at AirTran is quite different. SW has already completed the purchase. This is not a prenuptial agreement. The TWA agreement was a prenuptial. Sign it or no purchase by AMR. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:42 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands