![]() |
Galdangit, ACL! Your silence is deafening. I have no other choice but to try to draw you out.
I think I am anxious about trying to stay based in DTW, because if the company moves the -9's, who know where I can go. So, when I had a few free moments, I came up with a prediction of what A/C would be in what bases in a year or two. Here what I came up with. I didn't take the time to try to seperate the 7ER, 75/76 or the -300/-400 or whatever it's called. ACL, feel free to shoot it down. Aloha~ NYC 777 330 737 M88 ATL Everything Including the -400, 330's and the DC-9 CVG 76/75 320 M88 DTW -400 777 330 76/75 320 DC-9 MSP 330 76/75 M88/90 320 DC-9 MEM 320 M88 DC-9 SLC 76/75 320 M88 SEA 76/75 737 (Depending on what happens with Alaska) LAX 777 76/75 737 HNL 747-400 76/75 Personally, I don't see how MEM and CVG make it. But, wouldn't be surprised if something in Texas opened back up. Are you happy now, Super? :) |
What's the latest rumor on a South AE?
|
August- no displacements projected thus far.
|
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 612593)
Galdangit, ACL! Your silence is deafening. I have no other choice but to try to draw you out.
I think I am anxious about trying to stay based in DTW, because if the company moves the -9's, who know where I can go. So, when I had a few free moments, I came up with a prediction of what A/C would be in what bases in a year or two. Here what I came up with. I didn't take the time to try to seperate the 7ER, 75/76 or the -300/-400 or whatever it's called. ACL, feel free to shoot it down. Aloha~ NYC 777 330 737 M88 ATL Everything Including the -400, 330's and the DC-9 CVG 76/75 320 M88 DTW -400 777 330 76/75 320 DC-9 MSP 330 76/75 M88/90 320 DC-9 MEM 320 M88 DC-9 SLC 76/75 320 M88 SEA 76/75 737 (Depending on what happens with Alaska) LAX 777 76/75 737 HNL 747-400 76/75 Personally, I don't see how MEM and CVG make it. But, wouldn't be surprised if something in Texas opened back up. Are you happy now, Super? :) I personally think they will keep MEM around and draw down CVG. We'll see |
Originally Posted by Superpilot92
(Post 612661)
Holding My Breath!!! Come on Texas!!!! ;)
I personally think they will keep MEM around and draw down CVG. We'll see Scoop |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 612593)
ATL
Everything Including the -400, 330's and the DC-9 |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 612665)
I think New nailed it - CVG and MEM are probably toast. However MEM may have some tactical value in providing an alternative to ATL, which may help keep the costs down in ATL. Or then again, maybe not.
Scoop |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 612593)
Personally, I don't see how MEM and CVG make it.
The company didn't say how big they would be. The cost of a base doesn't have to be big - the fixed costs are a few rooms for offices, a secretary or two, and a CP. The variable costs are the deadheading costs because the base doesn't have much flying (see CVG right now). You save money by not displacing people and paying moving costs. This cost can be minor compares to the media coverage of "closing a base". |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 611562)
We have a lot of IT issues and Tech Ops issues that need to be worked out.
|
Originally Posted by Superpilot92
(Post 612661)
Holding My Breath!!! Come on Texas!!!! ;)
I personally think they will keep MEM around and draw down CVG. We'll see In his chat last week, Ed reaffirmed Delta's commitment to MEM, he wasn't asked about CVG but I suspect he'd say the same thing (politics). If they pull down CVG any more, they might as well close the base; and if they move the 320s there they'll displace some very senior bubbas on the 737 which might just force them to close the base as well. As opposed to either the training costs or the moving costs. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:30 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands