![]() |
Originally Posted by Ragtop Day
(Post 1079453)
No mention of it not being a Delta mainline flight.:cool:
|
Originally Posted by Waves
(Post 1079339)
Yeah, I'm sure my post sounded condescending. I should have known better. :( Sorry, it wasn't meant that way.......Our tickets would vaporize if we did that. So much for Captain’s authority.
I think Delta does a great job supporting their Captains. |
Originally Posted by Xray678
(Post 1079472)
No offense taken. My biggest beef with the FAA is I think way too often guys dump gas rather than land overweight for no other reason than they are afraid of the FAA. If you have a long dry runway and there is no problem controlling the airplane, there is no reason a crew should not land overweight.
I think Delta does a great job supporting their Captains. There are degrees of overweight. I don't think I'd try one 200,000# overweight unless I was on fire in a bad way. |
Originally Posted by Xray678
(Post 1079472)
No offense taken. My biggest beef with the FAA is I think way too often guys dump gas rather than land overweight for no other reason than they are afraid of the FAA. If you have a long dry runway and there is no problem controlling the airplane, there is no reason a crew should not land overweight.
I think Delta does a great job supporting their Captains. I think you may be right about some fear of the faa. Not necessarily unjustified since your livelihood may be on the line, but: I don't know if it is official DAL policy, but in an emergency, they are supportive of dumping fuel until you arrive at the field you are going to land at, ceasing the dumping operation, and landing. Just dont forget to run the overweight landing checklist. There are times when dumping to get yourself to normal landing weight is justified. Captain's authority is still alive. |
Originally Posted by Green Giant
(Post 1079308)
Those are some great questions. I still wonder why they were not still "cloked" for landing. It would have been great to land "cloked" then un-cloke for the media. Maybe some of the Star Trek people can chime in........
|
Originally Posted by Boomer
(Post 1079455)
Happier times, before the cone of shame.
|
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1079489)
There are times when dumping to get yourself to normal landing weight is justified.
Captain's authority is still alive. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1079495)
Uncontained engine failure on Delta 747 photos
http://sitelife.aviationweek.com/ver...152f.Large.jpg |
Photos have emerged of an uncontained engine failure suffered by a Delta Airlines Boeing 747-400 last week en-route from Detroit to Tokyo’s Narita airport in Japan.
The engine failure, which occurred to N661US on Oct 23, took place as the Pratt & Whitney PW4056-powered aircraft was climbing through 5,000 ft. The crew heard a large compressor stall and muffled explosion followed by the immediate rollback of engine number two. The engine fire light then illuminated and, with this still indicating at idle power setting, the crew activated the fire bottle. Having successfully extinguished the fire, the crew executed a text book fuel dump procedure after deciding against an over-weight landing. On return to Detroit post-flight inspections revealed severe damage to the engine and wing with large holes noted in the cowling as well as damage to slats, flaps and aileron. As an indication of the violence of the failure, witnesses also say the engine was askew on the pylon. Investigations continue into the cause of the engine failure |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:48 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands