![]() |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1136300)
I agree with that statement. After a split the stock will definitely go up, or go down.
With commentary like that, you'd be a shoo in to replace Jamie Baker at JP Morgan. :) Actually, your track record is a lot better than Jamie's $8 target on AA when they entered bankruptcy. Ha, wrote the first part quick and I got nailed for it. Love APC! :D Airlines stocks have not split in many moons, and to see one splitting means that where it will go and what it will do, a little less of a certainty. As I said ALK is over valued and the split may result in the price going down. Then again, I do not really know how their stock is doing so well expect that they have kept it up so that many could sell! Wrt to a stock swap, it is more about a management of perception with a 3-1 versus a 8 or 9-1 in a acquisition. I would be surprised to see anything happen before the future of AMR is more clearer. |
Originally Posted by Fishfreighter
(Post 1136063)
In theory you're correct. However, the Company also announced its going to spend $50M to buy back stock. Usually they "buy it back" from the senior corporate officers with stock options. That makes over $300M worth of stock the Company has bought over the last few years.
Opinion only: 1. DAL 2. SWA A: I think we have a destiny — to be the first airlines to truly transform ourselves and break the malicious cycle of boom and bust that has plagued the industry. We've done a lot of great things in our history, but this is something that hasn't yet been accomplished. Our future should be one where we continue to grow and prosper and provide terrific service to our customers and great jobs for our people. We should do this in a way where good begets good and we get stronger as we go — reinvesting in our business, enhancing our product, making ourselves more competitive, and further reducing our vulnerability. It has to be earned through performance, but we should have a future where we are a strong, independent, Seattle-based company. |
Originally Posted by TOGA LK
(Post 1136384)
Please tell me that's not Buzz Hazzard?
|
Originally Posted by TOGA LK
(Post 1136337)
Doesn't delta have over 800,000,000 shares floating around?
It has around 850 million shares as well. :D |
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1136376)
January 2010 - Delta Pilots In Category = 10,632
January 2012 - Delta Pilots In Category = 10,653 We are slowly being liquidated. The fact that we still have roughly the same number of pilots as when we had 70 more aircraft only proves that we're way fat on pilots right now, which all of us already know. It does nothing to bolster your goofy attempt at trying to "prove" we're not slowly liquidating. It's all the more troubling that you behave this way as one of our unelected MEC bureaucrats. Everytime you guys try this type of obfuscation, you lose more credibility. Carl |
Carl
DAL needs to be replacing 35 airplanes a year to renew the fleet every 20 years. We are far from that and that is concerning. A lot of our jets are getting older and many will need to replace about the same time. That is a lot of money at once. |
Originally Posted by Whidbey
(Post 1136255)
I definitely think there is a bright future for Delta Air Lines, but the word is out (at least in the active duty military) that with respect to pay, it's a third or fourth choice.
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1136320)
Hopefully management will be aware of this and take steps, ie. improved compensation, to correct it.
From guys getting out of my previous squadron FDX, SWA, and UPS are currently preferred over DAL. Mil pilots on active duty (those who can get out) are making $100-120K per year. The desert meat grinder is slowly coming to an end. QOL is improving on the mil side. Right now, there is NO financial incentive for anyone to want to leave the military and come to DAL. It has taken me 5 years to make the same pay that I did on active duty. However, for me, I will take DAL QOL any day over the chair force's. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1136429)
Carl
DAL needs to be replacing 35 airplanes a year to renew the fleet every 20 years. We are far from that and that is concerning. A lot of our jets are getting older and many will need to replace about the same time. That is a lot of money at once. Carl |
too good not to post and this thread needed some motivation ;)
http://cache.sharenxs.com/images/wz/...tondancing.gif |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1136435)
That has nothing to do with the fact that we are operating about 70 less aircraft than we did after the merger. Then there's the closing of buildings and facilities, and "layoffs" of non frontline employees. By any measure, that is a slow liquidation. The only argument I might have with Bar is him calling it slow.
Carl It goes in concert with what Bar said. We are renewing,cabins which need to be done anyway but not replacing jets. We are down for many reasons but a big one is there is no fleet replacement. Bar and I had a long talk about this today as well. We were at 767 and now are at 709. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:49 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands