![]() |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1087435)
That whole van deal is one touchy subject. I agree the pilots should get it too, but I was told the reason the FA"s get it is for their safety.
|
Just heard that the NMB just stated that Delta did not interfere with the flight attendant union elections, maybe paving the way for integration of North and South Flight attendants. Stay tuned!
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1087227)
http://www.crashdehabsheim.net/galer...passage_26.jpg |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1087427)
Why?
If so, why do we carry them all over New York on "our" van? How many things to they "me too" on with the pilots. Seems like ALPA and the CPO could agree nearly instantly that's a stupid rule and change it. I don't like it but that's the reality. |
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 1087453)
Just heard that the NMB just stated that Delta did not interfere with the flight attendant union elections, maybe paving the way for integration of North and South Flight attendants. Stay tuned!
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1087435)
That whole van deal is one touchy subject. I agree the pilots should get it too, but I was told the reason the FA"s get it is for their safety.
Can't we all just get along? |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1087435)
That whole van deal is one touchy subject. I agree the pilots should get it too, but I was told the reason the FA"s get it is for their safety.
But I really think it is to help the FA s who are working for peanuts in an expensive city to get to work in a timely manner. We pilots can afford helicopters, therefore no need. |
Also heard from a couple of folks in hdqr that NLRB ruled in favor of Delta over AFA.
|
Letter 30 & 31 anyone?
|
Originally Posted by n9810f
(Post 1087492)
Also heard from a couple of folks in hdqr that NLRB ruled in favor of Delta over AFA.
Looks like it's official. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands