![]() |
Originally Posted by FrankCobretti
(Post 1131513)
All I know is, I'm glad I didn't spring for those ANR headphones.
The Mad Dog is quiet, right? Right? |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1131505)
...a displacement the month prior to openers does send a message, even if it is not intended.
Money doesn't buy hapiness, but it sure helps when you're unhappy. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1131505)
This being my third section 6, a displacement the month prior to openers does send a message, even if it is not intended.
I'm also noticing a pattern of volatility emerging from the semi-company quasi endorsed rumor mill. CP's, LCA's and other folks in high(er) places are running the gambit from "impending hiring and awesome early outs" to "endless stagnation and be greatful we aren't furloughing...yet" and back again. Not saying the ones spreading the rumors are "in on it" necessarily, but they are getting their info from somewhere and those sources only give them what they want to give them knowing full well it will "leak". PsyOps 101. Get hopes up, smash them to the ground. Repeat until no one knows what's going on. Finally settle on bad news at the critical time and the sheep will beg you to settle for less just to get it over with and avoid "the worst case" end of the bell curve of possibilities. Would it be premature to identify this as the U. and D. in FUD from the age old playbooks of failed management teams that consistently run great airlines into the ground? |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1131523)
Im curious about how trip parking plays into it as well. Like selling your vacation I do think it's important to protect pilots from pilots.
Any shady "trip parking" takes place after the bid is awarded, and thus, should not affect manning. Or am I missing something? :confused: |
Originally Posted by More Bacon
(Post 1131546)
Although I disagree wholeheartedly with trip parking--how would it affect manning?
Any shady "trip parking" takes place after the bid is awarded, and thus, should not affect manning. Or am I missing something? :confused: If you pay close attention to reserve coverage in certain categories, it's pretty obvious that regular lineholders are doing the overwhelming majority of the uncovered flying. For flight-whaures, this is great news. From a staffing perspective, it's a disaster. Makes me sick. Congrats on posting something without using the usual acronyms, btw. |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1131520)
Bar,
Pilots think our core business is safely transporting passengers. Management thinks our core business is selling tickets. They are investing in what they perceive our core business is. Carl |
Originally Posted by More Bacon
(Post 1131546)
Although I disagree wholeheartedly with trip parking--how would it affect manning?
Any shady "trip parking" takes place after the bid is awarded, and thus, should not affect manning. Or am I missing something? :confused: |
Originally Posted by More Bacon
(Post 1131546)
Although I disagree wholeheartedly with trip parking--how would it affect manning?
Any shady "trip parking" takes place after the bid is awarded, and thus, should not affect manning. Or am I missing something? :confused: Our manning formula includes a factor for increasing pilots in category based (in part) on how many greenslips are awarded in category. So, if pilots can circumvent the monthly ALV + 15 line limit, by parking trips, to pick up more time, then un-parking their trip, resulting a line far above ALV + 15, well, that trip is no longer in Open Time, and doesn't need to be covered, by a reserve or by a Green Slip. Thus no increase in manning, in fact, a decrease is warrented, as even the reserves are not flying very much. If every pilot is flying just 7.5 hours per month above ALV+15, that equates to about 1,200 less pilots needed to fly the schedule. If you are in the bottom 10% of your category, expect to be displaced to a lower paying category. Or...just fly 75 in a higher paying category...the job you save could be your own. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1131552)
We have way too much to fight for than trying to preserve all the little micro empires like trip parking, LCA buddy bidding and the narcotic pursuit of touch drop vacations. That's a lot of fat concentrated in very, very few places. High cost : low benefit.
A good Swap with the Pot, with rational restrictions, would keep everyone honest at or below max pick-up, and wouldn't allow those that whaure for the flying to add insult to injury by trashing the staffing. I know this very idea infuriates a bunch of people, but at some point in your career, you've got to look around, realize your friends are turning tricks, with white stuff on their nose, and you've got to wonder if it wouldn't be better if we could get our dignity (and our staffing) back. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1131462)
Again I ask: "What is our core business?" "Then why don't we invest in that?"
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1131520)
Bar,
Pilots think our core business is safely transporting passengers. Management thinks our core business is selling tickets. They are investing in what they perceive our core business is.
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1131539)
I'm also noticing a pattern of volatility emerging from the semi-company quasi endorsed rumor mill. CP's, LCA's and other folks in high(er) places are running the gambit from "impending hiring and awesome early outs" to "endless stagnation and be greatful we aren't furloughing...yet" and back again. Not saying the ones spreading the rumors are "in on it" necessarily, but they are getting their info from somewhere and those sources only give them what they want to give them knowing full well it will "leak". PsyOps 101.?
Now I must go google - counter psyops.
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1131552)
Doesn't it allow guys to fly more than they otherwise could? And if so, doesn't that skew the numbers of required reserves and whatnot? It isn't the biggest factor in staffing but it impacts it to some degree. Not to mention its pretty shady. We have way too much to fight for than trying to preserve all the little micro empires like trip parking, LCA buddy bidding and the narcotic pursuit of touch drop vacations. That's a lot of fat concentrated in very, very few places. High cost : low benefit.
That's not Bar btw because he wouldn't have been the catalyst behind himself being displaced. The reaction may be identical though, but it's not Bar. :D |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:23 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands