![]() |
Originally Posted by More Bacon
(Post 1133559)
By the same token, a commuter's QOL should not be boosted at the expense of an in-base guy's QOL, should it?
Frankly, I am a little tired of the entitled attitude seen above. The world does not revolve around you just because you are commuting. And it shouldn't. A decent commuting policy has a small cost, in the form of the occasional positive space pass. Building commutable trip, however, is a no cost item. |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1133656)
Hmmm... Have the bean counters finally found a way to "shrink to profitability"? It never worked in the past but it appears to be working now. Are we shrinking? I know for a fact that the pilot group is shrinking - has been for years, but is the Delta network shrinking? Do passengers buying a DAL ticket have less options? When you include outsourced flying I am not sure that DAL is shrinking. Lets see who else flies DAL passengers: DCI - 9 or 10 carriers decided on lowest cost. Alaska - Tons of passengers via domestic code-share. Joint Ventures - Can't keep track - but I am told they are good for DAL Pilots. :cool: Sky Team - Who the hell isn't in Sky team these days. So although we, meaning Delta Air Lines are probably shrinking at a good clip - the Delta Network is definitely not shrinking. So I don't think the "You can not shrink to profitability" mantra applies anymore - it is pretty much an obsolete way of thinking. Scoop |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1133396)
I don't think this will hose the junior guys over - but I really don't know how it will play out. But, and its big but, (no pun intended :)) if it does harm the junior guys I am all for fixing it. Scoop Good to hear, Scoop. Which has me thinking...not enough side/under/over/anyboob on here lately. http://thechive.files.wordpress.com/...pg?w=919&h=617 |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1133671)
Sort of ... .
The profit is also being helped out in a big way by all of the fees that we are charging for everything. They are not taxed and go right to the bottom line. Shrinking my not be making the money, but the way the price structure of the services is now being used. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1133671)
Plan B is probably going to be high performance turboprops, which are not currently constrained by our scope. Bombardier will gladly resupply the market. The Q-400 has great operating numbers, but allegedly passengers don't like it. It's other problem is it's 737-800 sized footprint which makes it a bit of an elephant at a ramp developed for 50 seat RJ's. (ALPA is aware and I expect turboprop scope to be a part of C2012)
We need a competitive small jet that we fly. Props, RJs, Delta Private Jets: If it says Delta on the side, a Delta pilot should fly it. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1133671)
Sort of ... .
|
Commuting
As a commuter I am sick of the commuter/ non commuter threads. We are expanding into the busiest most delayed airspace in the world (NYC), with fewer seats (econ comfort) and with that expansion creating hundreds of new commuters. Get over it. If you are not a commuter as it has been said before its better if you understand the plight of commuters and help better commuters lives too here's why. The easier it is too commute the less we (commuters) will require contractual protections for commuters and guess what that means more attention paid to pay rates, schedules etc. If we are over 50 percent of the pilots at delta we have a majority. Everyone will be affected if we operate less reliably canceled flights, more reserves working, more reroutes etc. This commuter/non-commuter debate is very similar to other fights we have had within our profession that have had adverse effects for EVERYONE. Age 65, RJs and now big RJs. the more we work together, learn together and support ourselves together the better we will be. |
Originally Posted by CVG767A
(Post 1133687)
A decent commuting policy has a small cost, in the form of the occasional positive space pass. Building commutable trip, however, is a no cost item.
There are early morning departures from most (if not all) pilot domiciles. Those trips need to be covered... I live in base and don't particularly enjoy 0-dark-thirty sign-ins. If my seniority allows me to hold trips with more gentlemanly sign-ins (AKA: commuter friendly) I will bid them if I want to. (I suspect many pilots who live in base will do so as well.) I'm not out to screw someone, but sign-in time is one of the parameters I evaluate when I look at bidding. I'm not going to bid "crappy" trips so the more junior commuters have an easier commute. If a commuting pilot don't have the seniority to hold commutable trips, perhaps they should consider bidding a category that allows them that ability. |
Originally Posted by ilinipilot
(Post 1133728)
Commuting
As a commuter I am sick of the commuter/ non commuter threads. We are expanding into the busiest most delayed airspace in the world (NYC), with fewer seats (econ comfort) and with that expansion creating hundreds of new commuters. Get over it. If you are not a commuter as it has been said before its better if you understand the plight of commuters and help better commuters lives too here's why. The easier it is too commute the less we (commuters) will require contractual protections for commuters and guess what that means more attention paid to pay rates, schedules etc. If we are over 50 percent of the pilots at delta we have a majority. Everyone will be affected if we operate less reliably canceled flights, more reserves working, more reroutes etc. This commuter/non-commuter debate is very similar to other fights we have had within our profession that have had adverse effects for EVERYONE. Age 65, RJs and now big RJs. the more we work together, learn together and support ourselves together the better we will be. *If we keep having negative bids, I may be commuting again anyways. It's been said before: If one of us has a problem, we should all have a problem. The "me, me" mentality is mutually destructive. |
My company, Pinnacle has major debt to Delta and is likely to declare bankruptcy in the coming months. We are starting to back out of the deal with United on the Q400's. After we declare, those Q400's will become Delta's property, it's anyone's guess what they do with them.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:10 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands