Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Check Essential 02-12-2012 09:14 AM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1133745)
I flew parallel to the second arrival yesterday. They got 28, haha!

They didn't like getting 28.
They were seen working on that problem already this morning.

http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/t.../dom-tower.jpg

Roadkill 02-12-2012 09:24 AM


Originally Posted by Wasatch Phantom (Post 1133731)
I'll define a commutable trip as one with a mid-morning or later sign-in and a completion before the last flight of the night out...

There are early morning departures from most (if not all) pilot domiciles. Those trips need to be covered...

I live in base and don't particularly enjoy 0-dark-thirty sign-ins. If my seniority allows me to hold trips with more gentlemanly sign-ins (AKA: commuter friendly) I will bid them if I want to. (I suspect many pilots who live in base will do so as well.)

I'm not out to screw someone, but sign-in time is one of the parameters I evaluate when I look at bidding. I'm not going to bid "crappy" trips so the more junior commuters have an easier commute.

If a commuting pilot don't have the seniority to hold commutable trips, perhaps they should consider bidding a category that allows them that ability.

Absolutely, this is pretty much a "non argument" point, and most everyone would agree with you, commuter and non alike. What I'd guess keeps your normal desire to wake up for a long day at work at a decent normal hour from depleting all the "commutable trips" via assignment to in-base senior folks before any less-senior commuters can see them, is this: trips departing in the 0600-1000 banks tend to be worth 2-6 hours more pay.

I think that most folks will ALSO make the decision, "If I can work 2 days less this month by showing up to work 3 hours early, I'll make that trade-off." I look at the reasons report to see how everyone senior to me bids, and my general impression is that total credit and Avg. credit per day take priority over report times. Whenever I see report time listed, I almost always see the additional restrictions that indicate bidder is a commuter.

I always do a sort by total credit, and also credit/day, and look at all the high-value trips to see if there is anything I'd like to bid that I can commute to. Again, general impression stats here, the top 20% of total credit trips all report too early (0600-1000) for a commuter. A much smaller group of trips is commutable yet still has top-tier credit/day.

As a commuter who looks at this religiously, I can tell you that roughly 40% of my bid pkg trips are all non-commutable (which of course makes sense--you can sqeeze more DAL flying into a trip if you don't have to include 2 non-rev legs at the ends.) I think that's a reasonable thing.

You can BET that I am very aware of this HUGE advantage non-commuters have over me: 40% or so of the trips I can't even bid on! There are a bunch of in-base folks junior to me, and they have access to 40% of the bid package UNSKIMMED by commuters! It always amazes me how blind those in-base are to this enormous benefit they already get. So long as there are commutable (and less total value) trips out there, those in base get a free-pass on 40% of the package by (in my category) 36% of the seniority list--and it's the highest $$ 40% of the trips!

But if schedulers reduce commutable trips, then commuters automatic PBS algorithm will just say, "fine, if I can't get a commutable trip, then give me one with the highest value of $$/work-time", and there goes your in-base free-pass. How that would affect those in-base depends on a zillion population-of-interest statistics different at each category involving how commuters are spread across the category. But in NO case would it be good for non-commuters. I say a better game-plan is this: have your cake, eat it too... then don't complain about how the crumbs are being given to the poor, less the baker say "fine, everyone gets crumbs then".

ps--no argument with your thoughts at all, just felt like typing and getting some use out of all that bid package study last night ;)

BlueMoon 02-12-2012 09:25 AM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1133764)
They didn't like getting 28.
They were seen working on that problem already this morning.

http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/t.../dom-tower.jpg


They'll keep getting 28 til they send some decent pizza up there.

Dominoes? Really? Cheapskates.

NWA320pilot 02-12-2012 09:25 AM

Quick jumpseat question...... Does anybody know the boarding priority for Comair jumpseats? Do we have priority over offline carriers or other dci carriers like 9e?

Thanks

STINKY 02-12-2012 09:45 AM

it goes comair pilots, delta pilots, offline

tsquare 02-12-2012 09:48 AM


Originally Posted by georgetg (Post 1133598)
oh, they're listening...

Cheers
George

I sure don't hear much other than the 747 has to pay $400/hour. Stupidity. :mad:

Sink r8 02-12-2012 10:20 AM


Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 1133505)
That was in my original answer, bolded below:

-1 point for reading for Sink r8. Thanks.

NuGuy 02-12-2012 10:35 AM


Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL (Post 1133639)
+1

The myth of reduced DCI airframes is as you state.

How many routes, formerly mainline NB are now flown by 70-76 seaters?

Now we hear that they'll be used to develop routes until they are profitable and we can put a NB on it? You mean the ones that used to be NB?

More likely we'll see them continue to be flown to outsourced 70-76 seaters more profitably (or maybe not, but a workforce they can continuously whipsaw against each other).

Just like AK, perhaps it's even profitable for the corporation. The problem is we are not doing the flying, and no amount of profit sharing will make up for the stagnated career progression.


Management is driving, ALPA in the back seat, line pilots watching......


Don't worry, Slow, Alfa, Sailing and maybe even PG will be along to tell you what to think, once they coordinate the new talking points.

That will give everyone plenty of juicy targets to get the flaming heads on the forum here spinning, and tucker everyone out, so no real changes get made.

Nu

TenYearsGone 02-12-2012 10:36 AM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1133778)
I sure don't hear much other than the 747 has to pay $400/hour. Stupidity. :mad:

I disagree. Sorry;)

IMHO, Its funny how the executive teams' pay has increased and fortified in this god awe-ful decade. Their pay (bonus, stocks,salary etc) is above and beyond all the other airlines executives that we, as DAL pilots, are not supposed to be compared to.
Our expectations and self-worth have been successfully degraded by ourselves (we are our worst enemies). Whether you believe it or not, we are worth more than we get.

Pilots are a 30 year asset to a company. We are in this for the long haul. We all want this company to be fruitful, competitive and desirable.

Lets just stop playing games over a nickel and get down to business. Cheers.

TEN

forgot to bid 02-12-2012 11:30 AM

Question. If you're on SC tomorrow, are you still considered LC for tomorrow?

For example, say that you have the list of pilots 1-10, say #1 - #5 are SC. A trip pops up for 18 hours from now. Does it go to pilot #1 who is on SC, i.e. revoke the SC and give them a trip or pilot #6, the first pilot on LC?

I know a reserve pilot is on long call on any on-call day on which he is not assigned to short call and I know what the ladder says but that's why I ask if you're still on LC.

But sometimes I have SC for the next day but they take it away and assign a trip most of the time with an earlier report but all > 12 hours. Sometimes they keep me on SC and go to the next LC guy. It goes either way and I was just trying to figure if that is schedulers discretion or there was a rule?

Will keep a lookin'.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:43 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands