![]() |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1131577)
I think there are some issues where pilots vote in the original survey that deserve a debate. If the MEC Chairman was to put out a couple of topics that he thinks we're getting wrong, make a case, then resubmit a survey on those points to see if we agree, I think it would be time well spent. I think I'd like to see a couple more feedback loops in the survey process.
Would you be agreeable to something like that, or would you howl that your expectations are being managed? However, that would have been something to lead-turn a year ago, not a few weeks prior to exchanging openers. My perception is that our Section 6 preparation, at least from a communications standpoint, has been abysmal. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1131443)
Today the Strategic Planning expert said we were overstaffed by 4% for summer flying. In reply to questions about picking up more time for better pay one of the Reps replied if we flew more, the conversation could turn to furloughs in this environment. ... Not that he was prognosticating furloughs, but the capacity pull downs seem to have no logical end in sight :(
I was thinking that getting widebodies out of the mod lines and eventually catching up with our half of the AF/FLM joint venture might turn things around. We are making money and getting metal, even if it is used Douglas jets no else on the planet wants. I expected a net neutral in 2012 with the first real positive bids coming near the fourth quarter. Instead, it is looking like many of us are going back to career jeopardy performing experimental test flight & design work to finish the MD88's initial design phase through incident reports and NTSB recommendations ... and that we'll be grateful for that opportunity. :eek: |
Originally Posted by More Bacon
(Post 1131568)
I guess the next question is...can DALPA do anything to "save us from ourselves" as FTB put it. even a simple memo explaining the calculus...
Sorry, sinkrate, had to work that acronym in somewhere. Now, to restate this for Dr. Buzz and my G's in LAX: http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cu...ar15362_30.gif With so much drama in the L-A-X It's kinda hard bein B-U-double-Z But I somehow, some way Keep coming up with funky *** ***** about Dems like every single day May I, kick a little something for the G's (yeah) And, make a few ends as I breeze through, It's two in the mornin in the A-T-L but out here my party's still jumpin Cause my momma ain't home I got my b****** being displaced from planes wit livin rooms And they ain't leavin because they got sometin better in da mornin We got a pocket full of shizzles parkin us all away They got them some fix to getin them paid Now this types of **** happens every other day When you got trip parkin hoes that say fool I gotta get mine So lets turn off the lights and close the swap board But (but what) we don't love them trip parkin hoes, So we gonna smoke a ounce to this We need to get the D-A to the L-P-A mackin this **** down G's up, trip parkin hoes down, while you ************* bounce to this... Makes sense to me. |
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1131571)
I agee with your intent, to eliminate trip parking, but I use the Swap Board lots of times in a -legitimate- way. Usually, I use it to move a trip a day or two over, so I'll put up a same-trip swap, just a day or two different, because Mamma threw something at me last minute, after bids closed, and now I need a different day off.
In the 'before time', we could swap trips, same trip only, no time diff. on your line, pilot to pilot, but we first had to call the other pilot on the phone, get him to agree to it, then call crew scheds, they would manually swap the trips (same time only, not higer/lower time trips) and sometimes they would even call the other pilot to be sure it was legit. So it was a huge PITA, but nobody was parking trips to get 110 hour lines. Oh, and we had a monthly cap, anything above 75 or so, went into your bow wave for next month's bidding, or you could put it in your 'bank', to be taken out at your leisure. If so, we'd all gain seniority, right? What's not to love. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1131586)
If we went back to the bow wave, wouldn't we be understaffed?
If so, we'd all gain seniority, right? What's not to love. |
If you want to see something that will reduce reserve required numbers, go take a look at the last 4 days of trip coverage for ATL7ERB. Averaging about 80% white slips.
|
Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
(Post 1131589)
If you want to see something that will reduce reserve required numbers, go take a look at the last 4 days of trip coverage for ATL7ERB. Averaging about 80% white slips.
then the white slippin shizzle comes grabin all tha two and one day trippin my mind is fizzled right now. may i never go down this road again. thanks b-u-double-z, you fizzled me like an A-A- would a T-W-A. Truth about white slipping is white slipping begots white slipping. You can't greenslip if everyone is white slipping and if you need cash now, and you're not on a buss of vikings singing a song about getting your cash now, then you really have no choice but to pull your GS and WS. What an ugly cycle that I watch from afar waiting patiently for the one trip nobody wants, the double deadhead to a short overnight. |
Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
(Post 1131589)
If you want to see something that will reduce reserve required numbers, go take a look at the last 4 days of trip coverage for ATL7ERB. Averaging about 80% white slips.
|
Gloopy, I found the psyops handbook for smacking down Delta pilots leading into C2012.
http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-05-301.pdf No idea what that's doing on the internet but: PSYOP are planned operations that convey selected information and indicators to target audiences (TAs) to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately, the behavior of the group and individuals. The purpose of all PSYOP is to create in neutral, friendly, or hostile groups the emotions, attitudes, or desired behavior that support the achievement of competitive and board of directors objectives and missions. In doing so, PSYOP influence not only policy and decisions, but also the ability to govern, the will to fight, the will to obey, and the will to support. The combination of PSYOP products and actions create in the selected TAs a behavior that supports company policy objectives and the directors intentions at the strategic, operational, and tactical levels. The nature of PSYOP is varied and ever changing. PSYOP personnel must support a broad range of missions and force structures in environments ranging from austere to highly sophisticated and those who use anonymous web boards. PSYOP are planned, coordinated, and executed before, during, and after conflicts, and must be integrated at all echelons to achieve its full force-multiplier potential. Proven in contract and peacetime, PSYOP are one of the oldest weapons in the arsenal of airlines, as well as an important force protector, combat multiplier, and nonlethal weapons system. Effective use and employment of PSYOP forces provides many capabilities that facilitate successful mission accomplishment. The following are examples: • Project a favorable image of the company and allied forces. • Amplify the effects of a show-of-force. • Give target audience alternative courses of action (COAs). • Improve censorship, illiteracy, or interrupted communications. • Exploit cultural, political, religious, seniority, retirement or economic differences. |
Speaking of Identifying folks based on their posts... for some reason on my last trip, I got interested in this. Carl posted something narrowing his status down, and I found myself, for no apparent reason, looking at the seniority list and category lists looking where the intersection was for "possible Carls". Unfortunately I found like 25 folks that could be him-OMG is that DTW 744 category tight on hiring and retirement dates! Like everyone flying it is from a 1 year window of life!
Anyways, it was actually an enjoyable hour of looking at seniority and hiring/retirement dates for a category I'll never see. There's something about the stalker biz that everyone digs heh... you know it's true. It just occurred to me that I might have met Ferd the morning of the 7th going to work, before boarding. PM me if that was you, always need to figure out the local guys! Hmm, one more point. Last 3 Capts I flew with were happy with 20% and "scope just isn't that critical to my stage in life". Getting a bit bummed that scope may be a complete FO cause... |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:52 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands