Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 02-12-2012 | 12:37 PM
  #88751  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Express pilot
Yes it should go to pilot #1, you are still on long call and next for flying even though you have a SC the next day. They have called me at night and assigned a trip and taken me off SC. You can call ALPA on Mon and I'm sure they would tell you the same thing.
Ah ha. Thanks, that is what they've been doing lately but because it wasn't always that way I was kind of confused as to what it should be. Either way, don't really ever care if they pull a SC for a trip but it's just good to know for planning purposes. Like month I made plans because I had a 1430 SC, it was revoked for a 0900 show. All legal but it helps know I shouldn't make plans if I'm close to being called for a LC trip.

Originally Posted by Express pilot
But I wouldn't put it passed Scheduling to just do what they want. The last few months I have been 2 for 3 on items they have missed with giving out trips. I was told sorry new people.
I know, that's why I am all for taking people out of the equation. Just let me be one with the computer because at least it's predictable... and will know the rules.
Old 02-12-2012 | 12:42 PM
  #88752  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
As always, Slow's press releases are only part of the truth:

1) How many of those DAL aircraft on order are slated to replace airframes currently on the property?

2) DCI is 100 aircraft smaller....what was the change of gauge of the DCI makeup? How many of the smaller 50 seat RJs, which do not directly replace mainline flying, left the DCI property, in exchange for 70-76 seat airframes arriving, which DO replace mainline flying?

It's great if 200 50 seaters left the DCI property. Whats not so great is when they are replaced by 100 76 seat aircraft that parks 100 aircraft at the mainline.

Nu
The answers you seek are found in the 10-K that was released this past week.

1. The new aircraft orders are designed to be capacity neutral. Delta retains options on 737-900's, 777's and MD-90's for delivery in 2013 and thereafter.

2. DCI gauge has increased to an average of 58 seats per aircraft. According to Delta's 10-K, DCI capacity and traffic dropped 2% last year. Mainline traffic was flat on a 1% capacity increase. If you look at scheduled system departures from the OAG, DCI peaked in January 2010 at 60.4%. They are down to 57.4% of system departures in March, 2012. If you look at system ASM's (again from OAG) they were at 14.5% of system ASM's in January 2010, and will be at 13.8% of ASM's in March 2012. Your assertion that they are replacing mainline flying doesn't match with the math. DCI as a percentage of Delta flying got smaller.
Old 02-12-2012 | 12:47 PM
  #88753  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Do you really want DALPA to be like a "big business", Slow?

I like efficientcy. I like transparency better.

As to your last point, that's what I've been trying to tell folks here. To get to the top, you need to start at the bottom.
Posted as a reminder...I've answered your questions.

You didn't answer my question...

Any example...doesn't have to be big business or the Federal .gov.
Old 02-12-2012 | 12:48 PM
  #88754  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Sort of ... .
  • Legacy carriers and Southwest have shown remarkable capacity discipline. This has driven prices up. It is a temporary gain to be sure. Nature abhors a vacuum and carriers like Spirit will grow to fill it as quickly as they can. Our action (including AA and United) might even save Virgin America.
  • We don't own the RJ's. As capacity has shrunk it has forced Delta's partners into losses. The 50 seaters can not be re-deployed outside a network and remain profitable. They have to come up with a "plan B."
  • Plan B is probably going to be high performance turboprops, which are not currently constrained by our scope. Bombardier will gladly resupply the market. The Q-400 has great operating numbers, but allegedly passengers don't like it. It's other problem is it's 737-800 sized footprint which makes it a bit of an elephant at a ramp developed for 50 seat RJ's. (ALPA is aware and I expect turboprop scope to be a part of C2012)

We need a competitive small jet that we fly.
Bar,

I hear the MX reliability of the Q400 is not good. Have you looked at those numbers.? Just curious as I don't know if it is true.
Old 02-12-2012 | 01:34 PM
  #88755  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Bar,

I hear the MX reliability of the Q400 is not good. Have you looked at those numbers.? Just curious as I don't know if it is true.
Johnso,

Have you looked at the reliability of DCI in general?

Just because it's unreliable or low quality doesn't mean our management won't gravitate to it if they think it saves them a few bucks on the next quarterly report.
Old 02-12-2012 | 01:35 PM
  #88756  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Bar,

I hear the MX reliability of the Q400 is not good. Have you looked at those numbers.? Just curious as I don't know if it is true.
It's not just the MX reliability. The Q400 has been available for sale since 2000. Out of a total production of 383 aircraft (including all the military models) I think there are less than 60 flying in the US, and Bombardier only plans to deliver 28 worldwide this year. Their production backlog is just 29 airplanes. Compared to CRJ sales during the same period the Q has not been popular with Bombardier's customers. PCL says the Q400 contract is the worst financial performer in their portfolio.

It's my opinion that we need additional scope language covering aircraft in this class with "nextgen" powerplants.
Old 02-12-2012 | 01:53 PM
  #88757  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Johnso,

Have you looked at the reliability of DCI in general?

Just because it's unreliable or low quality doesn't mean our management won't gravitate to it if they think it saves them a few bucks on the next quarterly report.
I can't argue with you there!

Originally Posted by slowplay
It's not just the MX reliability. The Q400 has been available for sale since 2000. Out of a total production of 383 aircraft (including all the military models) I think there are less than 60 flying in the US, and Bombardier only plans to deliver 28 worldwide this year. Their production backlog is just 29 airplanes. Compared to CRJ sales during the same period the Q has not been popular with Bombardier's customers. PCL says the Q400 contract is the worst financial performer in their portfolio.

It's my opinion that we need additional scope language covering aircraft in this class with "nextgen" powerplants.
Thanks slow. That's good info. It appears that Pinnacle is in danger of nose diving fast. The Mesaba SAABs are parked and the Colgan SAABs are to soon follow. If Pinnacle can't get new terms to make their Q400 operation for United profitable, they may lose those too. Not looking rosy for them right now.
Old 02-12-2012 | 01:54 PM
  #88758  
Ferd149's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
The answers you seek are found in the 10-K that was released this past week.

1. The new aircraft orders are designed to be capacity neutral. Delta retains options on 737-900's, 777's and MD-90's for delivery in 2013 and thereafter.

2. DCI gauge has increased to an average of 58 seats per aircraft. According to Delta's 10-K, DCI capacity and traffic dropped 2% last year. Mainline traffic was flat on a 1% capacity increase. If you look at scheduled system departures from the OAG, DCI peaked in January 2010 at 60.4%. They are down to 57.4% of system departures in March, 2012. If you look at system ASM's (again from OAG) they were at 14.5% of system ASM's in January 2010, and will be at 13.8% of ASM's in March 2012. Your assertion that they are replacing mainline flying doesn't match with the math. DCI as a percentage of Delta flying got smaller.
Does Alaska do anything to these numbers?
Old 02-12-2012 | 01:57 PM
  #88759  
TeddyKGB's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
From: 7er
Default

Interest survey from the guys who aren't hiding the survey results. So far over 1,100 pilots had voted and over 80% say the raise should be in the 20% - 50% range. Vote up guys & gals if you haven't already voted.
Old 02-12-2012 | 02:12 PM
  #88760  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
Does Alaska do anything to these numbers?
Not much. Delta carried 160 million passengers last year. About 800,000 flew on Alaska code share flights.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices