Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 03-15-2012 | 01:10 PM
  #92971  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
That assumes we will pursue a prohibition on all GTF outsourcing. Zero seats if its GTF. I'd be very suprised if that was in there. We mentioned props and I don't think we're aiming to eliminate all outsourced props. I think we just want to get them covered in the existing allowable seat counts and therefore I think that's all we're aiming for with GTF's.

And like I said, if we don't lower the number of allowable outsourced jets, we will never sunset DCI because not only will management never be able to pass up the opportunity to outsource 255 turbofan DC-9-10's, new technonogy will eventually lead to more efficient models even without GTF. There is an entire industry dedicated to designing and building "scope jets" and whatever we allow now will be maximized and shoved down our throats for decades to come.
All true. Point is that there are many ways to take what was written in the opener. Guys are freaking out about some of the word usage. It could have been better, but spelling this out dot for dot and dash for dash is not the best way to go about it.

Production Balances can mean many things. That is why I say, wait for an agreement, but keep reafirming your damnds of a contract that has positive gains in every section, with scope gains being a large part of that. I will wait to pass judgement on the product we are given to vote on. There is a very strong chance that the first agreement; if subpar, is voted down by the MEC and we never see it.
Old 03-15-2012 | 01:27 PM
  #92972  
iaflyer's Avatar
seeing the country...
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,014
Likes: 41
From: 73N A
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
Overall, it was a short term gain (from the Pricline stock runup) which then lead to a long term meltdown in the industry pricing power.

Leo taught our customers to shop on-line for the lowest fares, rather than go through a travel agent.
I never understood that - the internet allowed the airlines to save $35 on the commission to the travel agent, but lost hundreds by competing with Priceline.
Old 03-15-2012 | 01:40 PM
  #92973  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by PilotFrog
JFK-EWR
Air Train to Jamaica Station
LIRR Jamaica st - Penn Station
NJ Transit Train Penn Station - Newark Airport (This is the toughest leg of the journey, hard to time the trains that stop at Newark Airport)
Air Train to Terminal B
Says it takes 1:56, but that is assuming you hit the trains right, and that is best case.

You can also do
Air Train to Howard beach
A train to Canal St
Path to Newark (city)
NJT train to Newark Airport ( again this is the tricky part )
Air Train to terminal

JFK-LGA
Not sure, but by public trans you can
Air train to Jamaica
E train to Sutphin
7 train to Archer
Q48 bus to terminal

There is also the Q runner, but not sure how that works.
Thank you. Very helpful!
Old 03-15-2012 | 01:47 PM
  #92974  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
While the PBS guy didn't talk about this, the Treasurer did. It was said at the last meeting, in the context of a FPL discussion, that 87 hours was the average pay hours per lineholder. This includes vacation, sick, etc.

Why not inlcude Reserves? I think they should.

At any rate... you got better numbers?
I think reserves get about 74 hrs. on a vaca month x 3 weeks/yr = 71 hrs. month, AND do reserves still get paid more than 70 a few months per year(I did many times), but I won't include that in the math below.....

Lineholder: 10,700 x 85% = 9,095 x 87 hrs = 791,265 hrs/mo.
...Reserve: 10,700 x 15% = 1,605 x 71 hrs = 113,955 hrs/mo.

113,955 + 791, 265 = 905,220 / 10,700 = 84.6 hrs/mo.

So it is only a 2.4 hour difference, and remember that the 87 number is a max, many ALPA volunteers don't even do enough volunteer days to equal the max fill up.

Also no pilot can pick up a premium pay trip if they get ALPA "flight pay loss", so it actually can REDUCE the income of pilots who would have picked up a premium trip once a year (all theoretical of course, I haven't had a premium trip in years.....)
Old 03-15-2012 | 01:55 PM
  #92975  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Cool Video

Riding the Booster with enhanced sound - YouTube
Old 03-15-2012 | 02:50 PM
  #92976  
buzzpat's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,070
Likes: 1
From: Urban chicken rancher.
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
* A comment to Sailing about previous wage increases to other groups. You mentioned that back in the days of C2K when the MTC employess got a 17% rasise after our deal. Well all employee groups are almost back to pre ch11 levels, we are not. Plain and simple.
And THAT, my friend, is the crux of the argument. And needs to be in DALPA's quiver.
Old 03-15-2012 | 02:51 PM
  #92977  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
And THAT, my friend, is the crux of the argument. And needs to be in DALPA's quiver.
And that my friend is why I posted it. It's the truth and no one should lose sight of that.
Old 03-15-2012 | 02:54 PM
  #92978  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
First off, you are a damn liar when it comes to my feelings regarding strengthening of scope... DAMN LIAR.
I only know what you post tsquare, and you've stated numerous times that you didn't want to spend any negotiating capital on reversing outsourcing.

Originally Posted by tsquare
Second. So then you must agree that the size of the airplane makes no difference when it comes to pay.
But that's the way things are now. Do you want to change that ... Even if it means using "negotiating capital?"

Carl
Old 03-15-2012 | 02:54 PM
  #92979  
buzzpat's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,070
Likes: 1
From: Urban chicken rancher.
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
And that my friend is why I posted it. It's the truth and no one should lose sight of that.
Absolutely!
Old 03-15-2012 | 03:14 PM
  #92980  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by FedElta
Carl,

When you have time, would you explain how the number of hours my butt is in the seat has anything to do with MY productivity as an employee/cost center/pilot of any given airline ? I'm pretty sure a FDX/UPS bubba will generate more revenue for their company than our legacy brothers in a similar crew position.......on a month to month basis, regardless of hard hours flown respectively....I'm pretty sure you know this. Working more/harder does not equal smarter/more productive.

Regards,
BG
Ask our management how pilot productivity is defined and you'll see that they define it as the minimization of credit time and the maximization of hard hours actually flown.

Carl
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices