![]() |
Originally Posted by padre2992
(Post 1162846)
The NMB doesn't care what the synergies were. They (the NMB) are living in 2012, and asking what have you done lately?
Originally Posted by padre2992
(Post 1162846)
If a person doesn't want to participate in future steps, it's an option. We could follow the traditional path to Section 6. The value of whatever the company wants to exchange for our expedited contract would disappear. It's a choice.
Originally Posted by padre2992
(Post 1162846)
Most pilots I talk to don't think 11% is enough. Most certainly think that 43% is for the lunatic fringe.
Originally Posted by padre2992
(Post 1162846)
Even staying in a Holiday Inn Express wouldn't qualify me as an Industrial Psychologist, or get me into a cubicle. Why does one have to know what seat and category a person is in? If he's in a position junior to you, does that make his logic less sound or his posts less valuable? Evaluate the words and thoughts, not the person.
Carl |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1162903)
Hey Padre;
If we all put you on our ignore list, does that mean you will lose your job? Carl |
That's a different debate.
The 737 is a much more capable aircraft. It can fly from SLC to SJC and from SJC to JFK. Both probably much cheaper than the 88. Because it is more capable, it should be paid more. Why? The pilots didn't buy it. We are only equipment operators. We don't get any extra bonus because of the way we operate the airplanes.. i.e. fuel underburn, saving time, etc... why do you suppose that is? I don't even think the 88 can fly from SLC to ATL on a hot summer day, unless you take off without a full load. I'm not trying to disrespect the 88 pilots (but you will anyway), because they work equally hard. It's just that when the pay was established on the 737N, it was high because of the contributions it made to the company bottom line. So, because it was done that way in years past means it is just as valid today? The "Rogerina" made me smile. Excellent creativity |
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 1162720)
Kentucky will win tonight but it won't matter....it will be vacated when the NCAA finds Calipari again guilty of violations. Just like they did with his UMass and UMemphis final four teams. He's a shyster. Great recruiter but doesn't do it within the rules.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1162924)
He's gonna have to recruit every year for the NBA, because it appears that he is the king of one and done. College basketball is being ruined right before our eyes... might as well start paying 'em.
|
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 1162973)
Yep, and its a shame. I'm from Chapel Hill and a UNC fan. Three of their best guys are bolting...at least they spent two years at Carolina.
^^^^^^^ +1 |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1162924)
He's gonna have to recruit every year for the NBA, because it appears that he is the king of one and done. College basketball is being ruined right before our eyes... might as well start paying 'em.
^^^^^^^ +2 |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1162920)
That's a different debate.
The 737 is a much more capable aircraft. It can fly from SLC to SJC and from SJC to JFK. Both probably much cheaper than the 88. Because it is more capable, it should be paid more. Why? The pilots didn't buy it. We are only equipment operators. We don't get any extra bonus because of the way we operate the airplanes.. i.e. fuel underburn, saving time, etc... why do you suppose that is? I don't even think the 88 can fly from SLC to ATL on a hot summer day, unless you take off without a full load. I'm not trying to disrespect the 88 pilots (but you will anyway), because they work equally hard. It's just that when the pay was established on the 737N, it was high because of the contributions it made to the company bottom line. So, because it was done that way in years past means it is just as valid today? |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1162924)
He's gonna have to recruit every year for the NBA, because it appears that he is the king of one and done. College basketball is being ruined right before our eyes... might as well start paying 'em.
Offering a player like Anthony Davis a chance at a diploma for what he bring$ to the university is a joke. That goes for all athletes. Pay'em all! (and I'm a UK fan) |
Originally Posted by jherk02
(Post 1163012)
Offering a player like Anthony Davis a chance at a diploma for what he bring$ to the university is a joke. That goes for all athletes. Pay'em all! (and I'm a UK fan) |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:29 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands