![]() |
|
Not a contract question because I don't think these have any business being a part of our TA, but if we were to take delivery of 717s and/or additional A319s, where would they be based?
My guess is ATL and NYC. 717s replace the 9 in ATL and increase lift to some shorter stage length LGA markets. The 319s make up for the longer segments the 717 can't cover. Perhaps we'll see entertainment systems on newly acquired 319s. I'm just hoping to bid out of NYC, but this doesn't seem to promising:( |
Originally Posted by CAAC ATP
(Post 1189428)
Not a contract question because I don't think these have any business being a part of our TA, but if we were to take delivery of 717s and/or additional A319s, where would they be based?
My guess is ATL and NYC. 717s replace the 9 in ATL and increase lift to some shorter stage length LGA markets. The 319s make up for the longer segments the 717 can't cover. Perhaps we'll see entertainment systems on newly acquired 319s. I'm just hoping to bid out of NYC, but this doesn't seem to promising:( |
Originally Posted by gloopy
I'd agree that NYC/ATL would be shoe ins. DTW also seems likely. And probably SEA and LAX once we roll back the AS code share abuse. :mad: I know, not likely we will do that. |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 1189425)
[/B]
Jack, I agree with this. Seems like it happens with some stuff every contract. That being said, it'll happen in a contract 5 years from now too....... Denny As far as I am concerned the ALPA lawyers we have used need to be immediately fired as they have proven their worth (worthless!). The company has smarter, more astute lawyers in their court. The company and it's legal team school ALPA/us every single time. We need to change things up if we don't want to be scratching our heads in six months or six years wondering how so many little details that jack our pay/qol/career progression slipped through the cracks. |
Originally Posted by SailorJerry
(Post 1189416)
I think if you look at any contract you have to take it from a very fundamental level. No MAY no SHALL no TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. Only the company WILL and the pilot WILL.
Even though a law dictionary finds SHALL to be imperative it's not as concrete as WILL. I figure it's easier to get a clear intent through negotiations and a good Contract Administrator can easily add "Or Else" to the end. |
Originally Posted by SailorJerry
(Post 1189446)
Still makes me wonder how DTW is chock full of 737s and MD-88s at 6am flown by ATL and NYC pilots, but it's apparently forbidden to give those management haters in DTW a plane to fly where they live. Driving to work. What a concept.
|
Originally Posted by Red Five
(Post 1189414)
Not anymore... I've sat 3 with a 4th tomorrow... that's bucket 2. The other dude is still in bucket one with 1 short call If I understand it right...
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1189460)
There are 2 different buckets, SC bucket and Days of Availability bucket. The SC bucket applies only to those with in the same Days of Availability bucket. If you are good for 4 days and he is good for 3, it doesn't matter how many SC's he had compared to you.
|
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1189454)
...or a rebuilding of the 320 base that was canibalized to fund shifting the Roosevelt hotel bill from the company to the pilots.
|
Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
(Post 1189386)
Not sure if anything interesting will be discussed but RA is/was supposed to be on CNBC this morning at 11:15AM. Anybody see anything?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:12 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands